Videographer pleads guilty to “Unauthorized Photography,” world does not implode

Allen Mowery

Allen Mowery is a Nationally-published Commercial & Editorial Photographer with over 20 years of experience. He has shot for major brands as well small clients. When not shooting client work or chasing overgrown wildlife from his yard, he loves to capture the stories of the people and culture around him.

jay-cougar-unauthorized-photography
Last week, Photography Is Not A Crime published an article about a Shreveport, Louisiana videographer who was detained by authorities for flying a drone over a local VA hospital while on assignment for a local newspaper. This brought screams of “tyrants” and “carry a gun” from Internet commenters, as most logical people in today’s screwed-up world can imagine. Mickey Osterreicher, renowned media lawyer and general counsel for the National Press Photographers Association, even weighed in on the subject, his comments being published in PINAC’s original article.

However, after all the fanfare had died down and the Internet trolls put away their pitchforks and migrated back to Reddit, little was heard about the case which “went to trial” last Friday. In fact, when I spoke to Jay over the phone, apparently I was the first person to give a rat’s tookus as to the outcome of his plight and the first to see how our brother-in-arms was doing.

The Facts

As with so much across the Interwebs, facts seemed to be a little skewed in favor of the sensational. I mean, how else are you going to inspire a nation of photographers to take up arms against their government? So, I took it upon myself to speak with Mr. Cougar myself (not in-person…my G5 is down for maintenance right now). Allow your Bastion of Truth to elaborate:

No camera cards were confiscated

According to Cougar, his camera card, which contained eight photos of the hospital roof and solar panels (what the newspaper article was focusing on), was willingly surrendered to authorities. There was no fight, there was no antagonizing, there was no arguing over civil liberties.

These were not rent-a-cops

Various commenters seemed to assume that the officers who questioned Cougar were mall cops who were experiencing a lull in their daytime soap operas or local authorities with egos that needed some stroking. However, according to Cougar, these were Federal law enforcement personnel, fully armed with bullet-proof vests and fuzzy dice hanging from their badges*.

*Fuzzy dice not confirmed, but we made our own assumptions.

“On assignment” is a bit liberal

According to Cougar, he is personal friends with the owner of The Inquisitor, the newspaper he was allegedly on assignment for. This friend allegedly called in a favor and asked if Cougar would be willing to grab a few photos of the new solar panels which had recently been installed on the VA hospital roof. No compensation was discussed. They are friends…like, the kind of friends who happily oblige when told, “Here, hold m’ beer.” This was not a commercial, paying gig.

Was NEVER a First Amendment Issue

Contrary to the slant of various outlets and opinions of commenters, this had nothing to do with impeding Cougar’s First Amendment rights – this was an issue of him not obtaining proper permission before flying into restricted airspace. Add to this the fact that, while Cougar took off and landed from outside the hospital property, he was required to go onto the property to adequately maneuver his aircraft, and he claims authorities could have nailed him with a whole lot more had they wanted to (including invasion of privacy of patients at the hospital, as far-fetched as that may sound).

This was the most exciting case in Federal Court

Because the transgression took place on Federal property, the case was heard in Federal court. According to Cougar, his case was the most exciting and egregious one to be heard in court that day, alongside those of trespassers and litterers. In fact, upon entering the courtroom, he was allegedly informed that, because of the attention already garnered by his case through various outlets, his would be heard last so as to not incur additional hype. (Again, probably a lull in daytime soap operas…)

The Plea

Cougar was prepared to argue his case in court, although he declined hiring a lawyer because the cost for a suit to show up in court, let alone argue anything worthwhile, far outweighed the potential $400 fine he was facing for the eight photos. At his hearing, he was asked to enter a plea of guilty or not, and, after being shown the potential bill for his fine plus court costs, Cougar found it rather expedient to simply plead guilty and pay his fine…a fine which totaled $50 for unauthorized photography and $35 in court costs (or, a total of $85 for the mathematically-challenged among you).

“Where art thy pitchforks now, brethren?”

The Aftermath

There…really…wasn’t…any… Cougar was handed back his memory card with photos intact and has to mail a check to the appropriate office for his fine. That’s it. No arrest; no threats of further action; no water-boarding of family and friends to extract information…just pay $85 for not obtaining proper permission to fly in restricted airspace, and move on.

While I was on the phone with him, Cougar was on his way to do more drone videography, this time (pro bono) for his local Channel 12 news station who had covered his story previously. Like they say, even bad publicity is still publicity.

What this means for photographers at large

I really hate to be the rain on your indignant parade, but the answer is: not much, really. When photographing, whether for business or personal purposes, be sure to follow the law. Should you choose not to, be prepared to accept the possible consequences. And, in case you haven’t heard, flying a drone, especially in an urban environment, is certain to draw attention. Be forewarned.

[photo: screen capture from KSLA TV]


Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Allen Mowery

Allen Mowery

Allen Mowery is a Nationally-published Commercial & Editorial Photographer with over 20 years of experience. He has shot for major brands as well small clients. When not shooting client work or chasing overgrown wildlife from his yard, he loves to capture the stories of the people and culture around him.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 responses to “Videographer pleads guilty to “Unauthorized Photography,” world does not implode”

  1. Rick Avatar
    Rick

    A rationally written article. Nice for a change.

  2. Sean Avatar
    Sean

    Most times I find PINAC and it’s founder nothing more than trolls who give only half the facts or go out of their way to provoke a situation for the sensational aspect. Photographers just need to use common sense. While we as photographers have certain legal rights it does not mean we can do ANYTHING we want with no consequences. In this case, the cops were 100% in the right and the photography was not. Glad to see it all turned out well.

  3. GuamTippedOver Avatar
    GuamTippedOver

    Thank goodness we still have cowards and police bootlickers like you out there protecting our rights.

    1. Allen Mowery Avatar

      Quite the contrary… I would love to have a DJI Phantom zipping through controlled airspace as I’m getting ready to take off in a giant, metal tube. Maybe, if I’m lucky, it’ll get sucked up into an engine and join us for the remainder of the trip!

  4. JessicaEndi Avatar
    JessicaEndi

    So because a photographer surrenders his property without being tazed or shot, somehow that’s makes it ok? A man was still detained and his property seized, just for taking pictures. The police showed a clear bias against his methods here — someone shooting photos from the ground would never have been treated this way.

    1. Allen Mowery Avatar

      According to my conversation with Cougar, he voluntarily went with police and was not “detained” against his will…which is a completely different legal matter than being detained and/or questioned against one’s will.

      The issue was not so much that he was using a drone to take photos but rather that he was flying a drone in controlled airspace (established by the FAA based on proximity to a local airport) and was controlling the drone while standing on Federal property.

  5. plaguebeast Avatar
    plaguebeast

    Why is it considered controlled airspace?

    1. Allen Mowery Avatar

      @plaguebeast:disqus: I believe it is due to its proximity to a local airport.

  6. Andrew Avatar
    Andrew

    Very unbiased article you have here. Good thing you are here to counter any slant from the internet trolls with stuff like: “and the Internet trolls put away their pitchforks and migrated back to Reddit”, “I mean, how else are you going to inspire a nation of photographers to take up arms against their government?”, “Contrary to the slant of various outlets and opinions of commenters”, “Where art thy pitchforks now, brethren?”, “I really hate to be the rain on your indignant parade”
    Way to call out trolls and slant in the trolliest most slanted way possible.

  7. Front Row Dave Beesmer Avatar
    Front Row Dave Beesmer

    This sounds somewhat similar(far from the same) on my arrest and recent acquittal…