Canon Shows Off with “Prestigious Accolade”. Actually It Is Rather Embarrassing

Mar 3, 2015

Liron Samuels

Liron Samuels is a wildlife and commercial photographer based in Israel. When he isn’t waking up at 4am to take photos of nature, he stays awake until 4am taking photos of the night skies or time lapses. You can see more of his work on his website or follow him on Facebook.

Canon Shows Off with “Prestigious Accolade”. Actually It Is Rather Embarrassing

Mar 3, 2015

Liron Samuels

Liron Samuels is a wildlife and commercial photographer based in Israel. When he isn’t waking up at 4am to take photos of nature, he stays awake until 4am taking photos of the night skies or time lapses. You can see more of his work on his website or follow him on Facebook.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

Canon says it took a right turn, but it definitely turned left
Canon says it took a right turn, but it definitely turned left

Canon USA proudly announced yesterday that its parent company, Canon Inc., was praised by Fortune magazine as one of the World’s Most Admired Companies in 2015.

The company didn’t make it to the top 50, but it ranked 7th in the Computers category. Apple, Ranked #1 in the overall list as well as in the Computers category, kept its spot for the eighth consecutive year.

What’s interesting though, and pretty hilarious, is that Canon completely misunderstood its ranking and advertised its lowest ranks as its strengths.

Also, Canon might want to look up the dictionary meaning of the word “prestigious”.

Below is part of the press release posted yesterday on Canon’s website:

MELVILLE, N.Y., March 2, 2015 – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, is proud to announce that its parent company, Canon Inc., has been named to the 2015 FORTUNE magazine World’s Most Admired Companies list in the computers category. Considered by FORTUNE magazine as the “definitive report card on corporate reputations,” Canon received its highest ranks in innovation, social responsibility and long-term investment value.

“We are honored to be recognized as one of the World’s Most Admired Companies by FORTUNE magazine and well-respected industry leaders,” said Kotaro Fukushima, senior director and general manager, Corporate Communications, Canon U.S.A., Inc. “The results of this year’s rankings are a testament to Canon’s commitment to investing in our customers and technology, and our core belief of being a good corporate citizen in the communities we serve.”

So far so good.

The list, which has been published yearly since 1997, used nine key attributes of reputation to rank companies.

The companies received a rank for each of these attributes, but it seems Canon misunderstood “rank” for “score”.

This image shows Canon’s “report card”:

Canon_Rank

Canon received its highest ranks in innovation, social responsibility and long-term investment value”. Not really, Canon. In this case a higher number means you were ranked lower.

“The results of this year’s rankings are a testament to Canon’s commitment to investing in our customers and technology, and our core belief of being a good corporate citizen in the communities we serve” this is according to Canon USA’s senior director and general manager, Corporate Communications. In reality though, Canon’s highest ranking was in the “Quality of products / services”, “Financial soundness” and “Global Competitiveness”.

A quick look at Apple’s results leave no room for doubt as to Canon’s misunderstanding:

Apple_Rank

Setting aside the embarrassing mistake, it’s still a great honor to receive this “prestigious accolade”, isn’t it?

Well, yes and no.

At first I thought it must be a tremendous achievement ranking 7th when you’re in the same category as Apple, but digging deeper I learned that it’s not all that impressive.

Analyzing the methodology used to create the list reveals that companies were initially selected by revenue.

A list of 1,400 companies was compiled from the Fortune 1,000 and Fortune Global 500 lists:

  • The Fortune 1,000 (the 1,000 largest U.S. companies ranked by revenue)
  • Non-U.S. companies in Fortune’s Global 500 database with revenues of $10 billion or more

The list was then reduced when Hay Group, who conducted the survey for Fortune magazine, selected the 15 largest companies for each international industry and the 10 largest for each U.S. industry. Canon is in the international Computers category, so it was basically guaranteed to be listed in the top 15 most admired computer companies.

At this point the list consisted of 668 companies from 29 countries.

The next step was to come up with the industry-specific lists for which Hay Group had executives, directors and analysts rate the other companies in their own industry.

That’s right; the “World’s Most Admired Companies” list is actually the “World’s Most Admired Companies By Other Companies” list. Client satisfaction or feedback from the general public was not calculated into the scores.

Each company was rated on the following criteria: innovation, people management, use of corporate assets, social responsibility, quality of management, financial soundness, long-term investment value, quality of products / service and global competitiveness.

Once the results were in, the top half of each industry survey was chosen to be listed in the industry’s category.

This basically means that Canon made it into the list because of its size, and then was ranked 7th out of 15 companies. I would say that’s an “average” company rather than an admired one. Two spots lower and Canon wouldn’t make the list at all.

True, the BCN Award winners I recently wrote about were also decided by sales volume, but that award recognizes sales efforts rather than determining how “admired” a company is.

Now that we know how the lists were formulated we see that Canon’s social responsibility (“our core belief of being a good corporate citizen in the communities we serve”) was actually below average and too low to get into the list on its own, and innovation-wise (“a testament to Canon’s commitment to investing in our customers and technology”) the company was rated just average.

So yes, Canon is one of the world’s largest companies in its category (which in and of itself is something to be proud of), but that’s pretty much it.

The top 50 Most Admired Companies overall list is of less interest to us as Canon didn’t make it, but I will briefly mention that they were chosen out of a list of the top 25% of 2014’s surveys as well as the top 20% in each of the individual industry categories for 2015.

The companies in the top 50 list were voted by the executives, directors, and securities analysts that responded to the industry surveys, except for this list they could vote for anyone of the companies regardless of category.

For those wondering about the other companies in the Computers category, here are the eight companies that received a “prestigious accolade”, as well as their previous industry rank:

  1. Apple (1)
  2. EMC (2)
  3. Fujitsu (7)
  4. Lenovo Group (3)
  5. Seagate (4)
  6. Asustek Computer (-)
  7. Canon (6)
  8. Western Digital (5)

So yeah… Sorry Canon, but you misunderstood your “report card”, it turns out that being in the list isn’t all that impressive and you actually dropped a spot since last year.

Ranking 7th in one of Fortune’s category-specific lists is nothing to write home about, let alone write a press release.

[Lead Image: Chris Potter]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Liron Samuels

Liron Samuels

Liron Samuels is a wildlife and commercial photographer based in Israel. When he isn’t waking up at 4am to take photos of nature, he stays awake until 4am taking photos of the night skies or time lapses. You can see more of his work on his website or follow him on Facebook.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 responses to “Canon Shows Off with “Prestigious Accolade”. Actually It Is Rather Embarrassing”

  1. Jim Huang Avatar
    Jim Huang

    Well….that’s awkward

  2. Neil Schulman Avatar
    Neil Schulman

    “: Canon Shows Off with “Prestigious Accolade”. Actually It Is Rather Embarrassing – http://t.co/jaXidnkLBm” @bythom

  3. Jim Johnson Avatar
    Jim Johnson

    After the “big announcement” fiasco last year, they should have fired their entire publicity department.

    1. gezezez Avatar
      gezezez

      no but the idiots on the net should think about what the MEDIA is reporting and how the MEDIA is hyping every bit of information it gets. especially the stupid RUMOR websites.
      canon never wrote they will announce a product.
      only the idiots on the intenet thought it will be a product announcement.

      1. Jim Johnson Avatar
        Jim Johnson

        I’m not a Canon shooter, and am very jaded and cynical, so I didn’t care one way or another about the “big announcement”. However, no matter what your expectations, that was a huge PR blunder. They hyped… something… as a game changer and then delivered an under-performing website and crappy slogan.

        In the end, they were known for reaching a new level of over-hyping, and that is not the message they want to get out. That qualifies as a fiasco.

        1. 23943t52344234 Avatar
          23943t52344234

          Show us where they wrote something about a GAMECHANGER!!
          You are either lying or making things up like the rest of the morons.

          1. Jim Johnson Avatar
            Jim Johnson

            23943t52344234 (if that is your real name!),

            I’m lying. Of course I’m lying. We’re all lying. It’s a conspiracy, don’t you know. Don’t let the secret out!

            Sincerely,
            Illuminati agent 43

  4. gezezez Avatar
    gezezez

    haters will hate.. you are by any chance a m43 or nikon users liron?

    1. Liron Samuels Avatar
      Liron Samuels

      My DSLR cameras are Nikon, as I’ve stated in several of my
      posts, but I also own an Olympus Tough camera and a Canon compact camera. If
      that isn’t diverse enough for you, I got my father a Panasonic.

      Canon makes some excellent gear and I’d be happy to own it if
      I could justify a dual set, but that doesn’t change the facts regarding the
      wrong press release or Fortune’s selection process for the list.