How to shoot Bokeh Panorama for animals and wildlife photography
Aug 18, 2016
Share:

Bokeh Panoramas, (Bokehrama or the “Brenizer method“) are a way to simulate a large format look with small sensor cameras. In theory, the process is simple. Take a bunch of photos, then stitch them together in something like Photoshop.
What makes it different from a regular panoramic shot, is that the subject is primarily portraits with a relatively shallow depth of field. It allows you to create images you can’t otherwise get in a single shot from a DSLR. In this new video from photographer Mathieu Stern, we learn how we can apply this technique to animals and wildlife.
As mentioned above, the principle is simple. Shoot a bunch of photos, then stitch them together. Actually doing it is another matter. For portraits, you want your subject to remain as still as possible. This lets you move the camera and take several shots over the course of a few seconds.
Doing this with animals, whether pets, a zoo, or wildlife, presents a major challenge. They tend not to take direction too well, and will move often, so you need to shoot quick. You’ll need to pay close attention to the areas you’ve shot. If they do move, then you may have to start over.

You’ll want to use a longer lens than to be able to get the shallower depth of field. I’ve used either a 105mm f/2.8 Macro or 70-200mm f/2.8VR when I’ve tried this. But, you don’t have to use a big budget lens. Mathieu used the Jupiter 21M 200mm f/4 for the image demonstrated in the video.
Once in the computer, you bring the images into Photoshop and stitch them as you normally would. You could also use panoramic stitching software such as PTGui or the free Hugin.

From there, you just need to crop, and fill in any gaps that you might have missed when shooting. Ideally, you want to cover the entire shot at the time of shooting, but small gaps can be plugged with Content Aware Fill.

Finally, just tweak and process as you normally would to get the result you want.

It’s interesting to see the technique applied to animals. I photograph a lot of animals in the studio. It’s rare that I come across one willing to sit still long enough for something like this. It does give me one or two ideas I might have to try, though.
Have you used this technique for anything other than human portraits? What kind of results have you had? Let us know, and show off your shots in the comments.
John Aldred
John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.




































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
6 responses to “How to shoot Bokeh Panorama for animals and wildlife photography”
The myth that longer a longer lens has a more shallow dept of field has been debunked many times. Here are a few.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/depth-field-part-3
https://luminous-landscape.com/dof2/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjSxo70hcvOAhXM7CYKHSROBlUQtwIIKzAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DHGpJNOZpwts&usg=AFQjCNFKzm0ayYgfFdiGe5uDDcqBOOZSIA&sig2=sqR8d5T7om28Y6ghp1DLxg&bvm=bv.129759880,d.eWE
You’re right, they don’t technically have more or less depth of field, however the compression offered by longer focal lengths increases the size of the background relative to the subject you’re focused on, enlarging those out of focus areas, and giving the perception of a softer out of focus area.
Longer focal lengths do not have compression. Take a look at any lens catalog that shows a photo grid where the camera does not move. There were even articles written in the 40s and 50s by guys like Feininger (in Popuar Photography’s column “Feininger’s Workshop”) that debunked this myth.
https://flic.kr/p/Km47ps
https://flic.kr/p/KmkjFi
Ok, well, then just go shoot everything with a 10mm ultrawide and knock yourself out. :)
Ha!! Awesome reply. Up-voting this.
Yep, would work absolutely if you had enough resolution to crop the field of view of a tele.
Same with panoramic shot with a tele. Results bigger resoluton final image, depth of field same as one ultrawide shot.