Ruling: National Park Service can’t ask for commercial filming fees/permits
Jan 26, 2021
Share:

Filmmakers, rejoice: thanks to a court case from 2019, you may no longer need to get a permit and pay fees for commercial shoots in national parks. D.C. federal judge has just made the decision, ruling that it’s unconstitutional for the National Park Service to require a permit and charge you with fees.
It all started in late 2018 when director Gordon Price was shooting his feature film Crawford Road. He was filming in Yorktown Battlefield in Colonial National Historical Park, Virginia without a permit, so two NPS officers issued him a citation, Hollywood Reporter writes. The same source reports that Price argued that the citation was amounted to “content-based prior restraints.”
In December 2019, Price sued the U.S. Attorney General (then William Barr), Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt, and Deputy Director of the National Park Service David Vela. As you probably know, you don’t pay a fee or need a permit for shooting in areas where the public is generally allowed. But in other locations, or if you use models or props, the situation changes. Also, news-gathering generally doesn’t require a permit. In his lawsuit, Price argued that the statute was “facially unconstitutional because it targets First Amendment activity.”
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly made the ruling. It was good news for Price and it will have implications for all other filmmakers:
“Mr. Price’s filmmaking at these parks constitutes a form of expressive speech protected by the First Amendment. The creation of a film must also fall within the ambit of the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of expression. To find otherwise, would artificially disconnect an integral piece of the expressive process of filmmaking.”
Kollar-Kotelly found that Price’s work was indeed affected by content-based restrictions on his First Amendment rights. If he was shooting for non-commercial purposes or showed only newsworthy information, he wouldn’t need a permit. The judge issued a declaration that NPS’s requirements for permits and fees for “commercial filming” were “unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”
Of course, I believe that the NPS statute and rules still need to be changed and adapted. I’m not sure how it works and when the rules will be changed, but chances are that you will soon no longer need a permit for commercial shoots in national parks. We’ll see how this will unfold further and surely keep an eye on the news, as this could be a major change for all filmmakers out there, and perhaps for photographers as well.
[via Hollywood Reporter]
Dunja Đuđić
Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.




































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
5 responses to “Ruling: National Park Service can’t ask for commercial filming fees/permits”
It appears to have no impact on STILL photography as of yet though.
And this is important! Can you be fined/cited if you take a picture (not with pre-intent of selling and later find you have an image that can be posted for purchase?
Why do you think that? Still photographers have 1st amendment rights as well, and to no lesser extent. The ruling was that the requirement for a permit or fee violated the 1st amendment of the Constitution. This ruling could also be applied to states and municipalities
The statute in question is about commercial “filming” but contained a provision about still photography that specifically said it was generally allowed without a permit “if the photography takes place where members of the public are generally allowed”. The exception was for still photography using models or props.
I haven’t seen the actual ruling, but in general when one part of a law is found to be unconstitutional the entire law is struck down. That would mean that still photographers can use models or props without a permit, though other rules could presumably still restrict the number of models and number/types of props. Since the ruling presumably also strikes down the permit process for working in areas that aren’t usually open to the public the result may be that no work is allowed in such areas until congress writes a new law.
After a two and a half year lawsuit against the United States Government we finally won. You can now film on National Park Land without a permit. But the ruling came with a cost. Our movie was held back from release and the bills piled up. I would like to ask for a favour, watch my movie to help us catch up on bills and get this ground breaking movie out to the public, now that it has been cleared for release. The ruling in our favor can be seen here
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/national-park-service-cant-require-permits-and-fees-for-commercial-filming-judge-rules?fbclid=IwAR1wocgIr6uVtMf4M6ZprEFZKhGoRHdpjG3lKU-iS2Nx2ZdQ6HsGrTWG8pM
link to Crawford Road movie
https://chapter11productions.pivotshare.com/media/crawford-road/101838?fbclid=IwAR07BIKbwBmhHwmRtfExWzRMm79D-Dctej2ppVCqZWdMY7uVJJzaAxVy4I4