This is how Canon’s f/0.95 Dream Lens performs on a Sony mirorless body

Feb 6, 2017

Guest Author

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

This is how Canon’s f/0.95 Dream Lens performs on a Sony mirorless body

Feb 6, 2017

Guest Author

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

Do you use a DLSR lens on a mirrorless camera? Have you ever considered buying a “Dream Lens” for it? It’s pricey and relatively rare, so it’s worth thinking it through. But a member of Sonyalpharumors, Austrokiwi, allowed us to share his review. He bought a Canon 50mm F0.95 lens for his Sony A7rII. And this is how it performs:

After almost two years of consideration I became the owner of a Canon 50mm F0.95 lens. I finally obtained one reasonably affordable when a Westlicht Auctions in Vienna (where I live) were auctioning one at a time that coincided with my bank account having enough in it for me to bid. This rare lens has a small but strong following and is often found modified to Leica M mount. Excluding prototypes there are two variants a range finder coupled and a TV version. The version I have is Range finder coupled.

My long consideration before purchasing was due to the combination of two important issues, cost and adaptability to my Sony A7rII. I have made the mistake in the past of leaping to buy a legacy lens, due to the enthusiastic reviews of others, and then finding it didn’t perform in a manner I liked.The “dream lens”, as many have come to call, it has many enthusiastic reviews but very few cautionary tales. Noting the usual selling price from US$2000.00 through to US$3500.00 I was concerned that the hype might not match the “bucks” needed to obtain one. The issues I was worried about before buying was Vignetting (a reported issue with Range finder lenses and FF E-mount cameras) and softness. Well I got the lens and now after nearly a month of ownership I can say clearly both those issues are present with the lens.However I no longer care, I suspect every time I am out with this lens on my camera I am smiling. It’s important to be clear this is nowhere near a perfect lens; it’s soft, it suffers from internal reflections, flare, spherical aberration, vignetting and its heavy and clunky( built like a world war II Tank). If you want a sharp F 0.95 lens then you wouldn’t want to go near this 1960s – early 1970s lens, instead it’s either the Mitakon speedmaster or the Leica Noctilux you should be going for. What I wanted, and got from the lens was the dream like bokeh and the 1930s film-star-glow the lens produces when wide open. If you want a legacy lens with Bokeh and sharpness you would be much better off with the Minolta Rokkor 58mm F 1.2. The Rokkor will give you bokeh and hair splitting sharpness, but what it won’t do is give you the “glow”.

The Dream lens seems to be a soft focus lens, a few years back I owned the Rokkor 85mm Varisoft, and that lens is the only one that I have used that comes close to what this Canon range finder lens does. Wide open, with the right lens -subject, subject – background distances, subjects, particularly faces, get a secondary glow about them that is reminiscent of the photos taken with the Leitz 90mm Thambar.When you add in phenomenal subject background separation and a unique buttery Bokeh this is a unique art lens. It isn’t for everyone and I should mention one other significant fault: its size.When adapted to M mount, Leica users find they have to use a credit card ( or similar) to operate the lens release button. On the Sony A7rIIthe necessary adapter frees Sony users from that problem but for those with hands and fingers larger than Donald Trumps (sorry I couldn’t resist)holding the Sony A7rII with the dream lens attached is an issue. In the following photo I have marked with two red lines, the gap between the lens barrel and camera grip.That gap is uncomfortably small and makes managing the lens Camera combination hard. I am seriously considering getting the battery grip to get around this irritation.

Here are small series of images taken over the last month

The lens, for me, has involved a significant learning curve. NowI only use it with the camera set to uncompressed raw.The reason being is a significant part of the unique character” of the images produced by this lens is lost in Jpeg compression. I have taken to using an editing technique more applicable to medium and large format photography; before each series of shots I take one picturewith a sheet of white photocopy paper over the lens.This creates a reference shot that I use in Capture one 9 pro for sony to create an LCC ( Lens Cast calibration) reference. I then apply it to all subsequent shots in the Lens calibration section of the menu. This takes the guess work out of correcting Vignetting etc ( this lens does vignette). Here is a shot appropriate to the Season.

I will probably get told off by my wife for posting the next 2(actually three shots) I mentioned at the start of this thread that the lens , wide open, produces a glow however, none of the previous photos really show it unless you know what you are looking for. Last night we were at a restaurant and Itook a number of shots.The following picture is constructed from two crops one at F 0.95 and the other at F2.

The “glow” is present in the F 0.95 crop. It isn’t just a matter of the lens being very soft at this aperture.The spherical aberration produces a secondary soft image around/over a sharper image. I believe, and am happy to be corrected, that this dream lens was designed so that the periphery of the lens produces this secondary soft image.When you stop down to F2you shut out that secondary image. You can still see the bokeh is acceptable at F2. I would note that as soft is this lens is its aperture range apart from the last two stops( F 11 & 16) compliments the diffraction limit of the Sony A7rII. Here is the full photo at F 0.95:

Please note the glow is much more evident in the 8 bit Tiff, the Jpegs above do no credit to the original Tiffs( as rendered from 14 Bit Raw by Capture one pro)

I understand( I am always happy to be politely corrected) that The glow can be enhanced by using the same techniques that were important for the Leitz 90mm Thambar that being backlighting of the subject. The lens, despite resolving to a lower level than the sensor, does work satisfyingly well on the A7rII. However I should add my best shots are occurring at night and so I suspect the lens may be a much better for the A7SII.

Canon 50mm F 0.95 (here on eBay)
Mount: Canon S (unique Bayonet mount specific to this lens)
year: 1960-1970(circa)
aperture range: F 0.95 thru F 16
7 elements in 5 groups, 10 aperture blades
Length (mm): 60mm
weight (g): 605
Adapter: Obtained via Ebay

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Guest Author

Guest Author

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 responses to “This is how Canon’s f/0.95 Dream Lens performs on a Sony mirorless body”

  1. stewart norton Avatar
    stewart norton

    Looks nice on the portrait but the other shots for me there is (get ready for this ) too shallow depth of field..i actually found the images hard to look at !

    1. veryferry Avatar
      veryferry

      I even dont like the portrait, but I can see making it work in a different setting

  2. Kryn Sporry Avatar
    Kryn Sporry

    Cudos to the author for the extensive write up. Regarding the question if it’s worth it, that depends on 3 factors: price you can get the lens for, quality/state of the sample you got, and last but far from least, personal preference. Personally I don’t really like the IQ as shown on the article. I prefer razor sharp abs contrasts lenses as any soft effects could be obtained through post, but sharpness and contrast cannot be retrieved from a soft image. However, I can easily see that others would possibly like this IQ.

  3. CNek Avatar
    CNek

    Find the bokeh unpleasing.

  4. Aleq Go Avatar
    Aleq Go

    Is this Canon Fd series?

  5. Jim Huang Avatar
    Jim Huang

    The bokeh reminds me the Nikon 50mm f1.8 D. I think this lens (also the 50mm f1.0L) are more of a technical demo than “being useful”. Don’t get me wrong, I think they are awesome and the pictures they produce certainly are special. Compared to this and other reivews, it doesn’t seems like it is a sharp lens even stop down compared to modern 50mm primes.

    Anyways, I hope camera companies and go back to make those silly lenses and make us laugh again. XP

  6. Petar Ardzanliev Avatar
    Petar Ardzanliev

    When I see TEST shots by day with lenses meant to use in the dark it’s like testing the night googles in the middle of the day…

  7. jerome jerdoet Avatar
    jerome jerdoet

    how about the lens adapter to the e mount sony ? which adapter that you use ot? because I have the lense, and i want to use this lens on my sony mirrorless…

    thank you

    jerry

  8. Love Jesus Avatar
    Love Jesus

    I have problem to find information about 50mm f/0.95’s flange to focal length. Which Canon type for this lens, S lens or R lens. I realized the information on websites did not give much information. I also puzzle about Canon 7 body. Some information stated this camera has 28.8mm FFD. The Canon 7 can use 50mm f/0.95 because mount has two different, bayonet or screw. Anyone can answer this questions. Thanks

    1. George the Bush Wizard Parkins Avatar
      George the Bush Wizard Parkins

      All I know is, the Canon 7 can mount standard M39 lenses, so the inner screwmount probably has a FFD very close to that of a Leica. I don’t know about the FFD for the bayonet mount, which was exclusively for this lens. It was a nasty move by Canon, coming out with this special, eye-catching lens, and then making it so that it could only be mounted on one camera. If this had been a M39 lens it would still be legendary.