DIY Photography

Hacking Photography - one Picture at a time

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

Submit A Story

Arkansas Governor Vetoes Bill Threatening to Criminalize Photographers Worldwide

Mar 31, 2015 by Liron Samuels 2 Comments

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

 

Arkansas_Win2

We recently reported Senate Bill 79 which intended to protect people from unauthorized commercial use without the person’s written consent, but in reality threatened to end street photography and criminalize photographers worldwide.

The huge outcry regarding the proposed law worked and Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson has just announced that he had vetoed the bill.

Bill supporters may attempt to override the veto, but the National Press Photographers Association states this is a clear win for photographers’ rights.

The Personal Rights Protection Act, intending to “protect the names, voices, signatures, photographs, and likenesses of the citizens of the state from exploitation and unauthorized commercial use without the citizen’s consent”, would solve certain issues that should definitely be addressed, but the way the bill was drafted meant it would cause quite a lot of unnecessary damage along the way.

For this reason Governor Hutchinson has decided to veto the bill, mentioning that it is too “broad and vague”, too restrictive and should have additional exemptions included.

The following statement was issued by the governor upon his veto:

“In its current form, the bill unnecessarily restricts free expression and thus could have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In addition, SB79 exempts certain types of noncommercial speech while failing to exempt other forms of noncommercial speech. The absence of these exemptions could result in unnecessary litigation and suppress Arkansans who engage in artistic expression.”

Governor Hutchinson signing the veto. Credit: the governor's website

Governor Hutchinson signing the veto letter. Credit: the governor’s website

In a letter to the state Senate, the governor also mentioned that this bill would “result in Arkansas having one of the broadest Rights of Publicity statutes in the country and making Arkansas the forum of choice for many litigants”.

He also referred to photographers specifically stating that the bill “will suppress Arkansans who engage in artistic expression from photography to art work” and that he has received “scores of letters from professional and amateur photographers in Arkansas who raise legitimate concerns about the bill and they request the language be amended”.

The governor ended his letter stating that he respects the intent of the bill, but that he cannot support it in its current form.

This bill was part of a string of overreaching and seemingly crazy bills that have been introduced lately, another example being the bill that would ban photographing police within a distance of 25 feet, so it’s very relieving to see Governor Hutchinson’s common sense prevailing in this case.

Another ridiculous bill that unfortunately became a law allows photographers to decline same-sex clients.

Below is Governor Hutchinson’s full veto letter to the Senate president and members concerning SB79:

“Dear Mr. President and Members of the Senate:

Pursuant to Article 6, Section 15 of the Arkansas Constitution, I write to inform you that today I have vetoed Senate Bill 79, which I have returned to you with this letter. I have done so because in its current form it is overbroad, vague and will have  the effect of restricting free speech.

SB79 grants a property right in the use of an individual’s name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness and makes this right freely transferable, assignable, and descendible. SB79 provides that this right continues through the individual’s lifetime and up to fifty (50) years after the individual’s death.  The intent of the bill is to “[p]rotect the names, voices, signatures, photographs, and likenesses of the citizens of the state from exploitation and unauthorized  commercial use without the citizen’s consent.”  However, the bill as drafted would extend protection beyond the stated intent of the bill, unnecessarily restrict free expression and may result in unnecessary litigation in Arkansas.

SB79 defines “commercial use” to include any use for advertising, fundraising or “obtaining money, goods or services.” While the intent is to protect citizens of Arkansas from unauthorized  commercial speech, the definition of “commercial use” to include any use for “obtaining money, goods or services” is too broad and vague.  This language may include speech beyond traditional commercial speech, including expressive speech produced for a profit. This would result in Arkansas having one of the broadest Rights of Publicity statutes in the country and making Arkansas the forum of choice for many litigants.

Additionally, while SB79 provides clear and explicit exemptions for certain types of noncommercial speech including news, public affairs, sports broadcasts and advertising for a political campaign, SB79 fails to extend an exemption to other forms of noncommercial  speech. Instead, SB79 provides that certain expressive works such as plays, books, magazines, newspapers, audiovisual work, and original works of art are only exempt to the extent they are protected by the First Amendment.  I believe the absence of a clear exemption for these types of expressive works will result in unnecessary  litigation in Arkansas courts and will suppress Arkansans who engage in artistic expression from photography to art work.

Moreover, the bill includes inconsistent language that makes it unclear whether a type of speech is completely exempt or is only exempt to the extent it is protected by the First Amendment. For example, SB79 explicitly exempts news and the promotion and advertising for a political campaign.  However, a “work of a political or newsworthy value” is only exempt to the extent it is protected by the First Amendment.  This ambiguity in SB79, and the lack of clear exemptions for certain types of expressive works, may have the effect of restricting and chilling constitutionally protected  speech.

Finally, SB79 includes broad jurisdictional  language to allow a party to file a civil action in any county where one or more defendants reside or a violation occurred. The broad jurisdictional  language allowing a civil action to be brought in any county where a violation occurred in combination with the absence of clear exemptions for certain types of expressive works goes beyond the stated intent of the bill, invites unnecessary litigation in Arkansas courts and encourages forum shopping.

I have received scores of letters from professional and amateur photographers in Arkansas who raise legitimate concerns about the bill and they request the language be amended so that they are not subject to substantial financial burdens in the conduct of their small businesses around the state.

Although I must veto SB79 for the reasons mentioned above, I wish to express my appreciation to its principal sponsor, Senator Woods. While I respect Senator Wood’s intent to protect the names, voices, signatures, photographs and likeness of Arkansas citizens, such as the Broyles family, from exploitation and unauthorized commercial use, I cannot support SB79 in its current form.”

Time will tell how much better a revised version of the bill will be, and it will most likely still have a negative impact on photographers, but it definitely can’t get any worse than SB79.

[via Governor Hutchinson’s website via NPAA | Lead image based on Arkansas Flag]

FIND THIS INTERESTING? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS!

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Related posts:

Texas Bill Threatens To Criminalize Photographers; Must Stay 25 Feet Away From Police California Governor puts an end to paparazzi drones Arkansas Wants Every Person in Your Photos To Sign a Model Release. EVERY. SINGLE. PERSON. Court Says Threatening to Arrest for Recording Police Violates First Amendment

Filed Under: news Tagged With: Arkansas, legal, SB79, street photographer

About Liron Samuels

Liron Samuels is a wildlife and commercial photographer based in Israel.

When he isn't waking up at 4am to take photos of nature, he stays awake until 4am taking photos of the night skies or time lapses.

You can see more of his work on his website or follow him on Facebook.

« A Different Perspective of the Selfie a day concept
The Big Guns To Join The Drone Game »

Submit A Story

Get our FREE Lighting Book

DIYP lighting book cover

* download requires newsletter signup
DIYPhotography

Recent Comments

Free Resources

Advanced lighting book

Recent Posts

  • The best photo-video April’s fools jokes for 2023
  • Clay Cook’s trippy portraits are the perfect combination of AI and real photography
  • Canon is starting to let 3rd parties make RF mount lenses
  • Canon recalls some EOS R10 bodies over “loud noises”
  • Netflix sued for using unauthorized drone footage in advertisement

Alex Baker is a portrait and lifestyle driven photographer based in Valencia, Spain. She works on a range of projects from commercial to fine art and has had work featured in publications such as The Daily Mail, Conde Nast Traveller and El Mundo, and has exhibited work across Europe

Dave Williams is an accomplished travel photographer, writer, and best-selling author from the UK. He is also a photography educator and published Aurora expert. Dave has traveled extensively in recent years, capturing stunning images from around the world in a modified van. His work has been featured in various publications and he has worked with notable brands such as Skoda, EE, Boeing, Huawei, Microsoft, BMW, Conde Nast, Electronic Arts, Discovery, BBC, The Guardian, ESPN, NBC, and many others.

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2023 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy