Facebook’s creepy patent wants to “read emotions” through your smartphone’s camera

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

A patent recently approved by the US Patent and Trademark Office details how Facebook wants to read your emotions. And it wants to do it using your on-screen keyboard. It’ll look at what and how you type to try to determine how you feel about a piece of content. The goal is to be able to bring you more suitable content that you might like to see.

Still pending, though, is another patent application, also dealing with “reading emotions”. Although, this one, is far more creepy. It actually wants to use your camera to watch you while you use Facebook to see how you respond to content. Again, Facebook’s claimed goal is to provide you with better suited content. But it does feel like they’re trying to turn your phone into your own personal stalker.

 

The approved patent seems fairly innocuous, and actually a little intriguing. Titled “Augmenting text messages with emotion information”, it attempts to determine your mood by how you type. It proposes features to “augment text messages with emotion information associated with the senders”.

It will use a number of factors to do this. Whether your typing speed is above or below normal, how hard you press the keys, looking for key words, as well as formatting and even the font you’re using. It will also look at your location to try to determine how you’re feeling.

I’m not entirely sure of the benefits this will offer, or even how effective it will be, but it’s an interesting idea.

What’s more troubling, though, is the still pending patent, “Techniques for emotion detection and content delivery”. This one wants to use your phone’s camera to visibly judge your emotion as you use Facebook.

The patent description starts off harmless enough, making a fair bit of sense. I mean, we’ve all sat through pages and pages of posts we’re not interested in at some point, right?

Users of computing devices spend increasing amounts of time browsing streams of posts on social networks, news articles, video, audio, or other digital content. The amount of information available to users is also increasing. Thus, a need exists for delivering content a user that may be of current interest to them.

The patent then brings up the emotions thing again. Then how they expect to judge that emotion.

For example, a user’s interests may be determined based upon their current emotional state. Computing devices such as laptops, mobile phones, and tablets increasingly include at least one, and often more than one, imaging component, such as a digital camera. Some devices may include a front-facing camera that is positioned on the same side of the device as a display.

Thus, during normal operation, a user may be looking towards the imaging component. However, current content delivery systems typically do not utilize passive imaging information. Thus, a need exists for a content delivery solution that takes advantage of available passive imaging data to provide content to a user with improved relevancy.

Essentially, the system works by capturing an image of the user while they’re doing their thing. It then uses it to determine a user’s emotion and stores this data. Facebook can then determine what emotions a particular piece of content evokes in its users. And it then uses this data to determine what posts to show and what posts to hide. Thus, all your users start to get creeped the hell out.

They say that the detected emotion types may be stored temporarily for a defined period of time. But they also want to be able to store the data permanently. A continual running history of your emotional state.

The patent does suggest that users could opt-in or out of such a feature. It doesn’t seem to suggest whether it would be on or off by default, though, were this to ever be implemented. And it seems they’re leaving it up to the operating system developers to give you this choice.

An operating system may provide privacy settings for a user, which enables a user to opt-in or opt-out of emotion detection.

Semi related to this is another pending patent filed just last month. This one will attempt to “read” your emotions based on what the camera sees in order to determine how you wish to “react” to a post.

No longer will you have to hold your finger down for a second in order to get those six options. The camera will just figure it out for you based on how your face looks.

The idea behind the technology is actually kind of cool, although I know a few people it will definitely struggle with. How Facebook suggest it will be implemented, though, while seemingly innocent on the surface, is extremely creepy.

Given how many people apparently drop their phones down the toilet, I’d hate to think of some of the sights that camera could see while users browse Facebook.


Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 responses to “Facebook’s creepy patent wants to “read emotions” through your smartphone’s camera”

  1. Peter Sansom Avatar

    of course they do. no surprises at all.

  2. Shona Marie Elizabeth Wheeler Avatar

    I don’t need help with content. I want to see my friends’ and followed pages’ posts, in chronological order.

  3. Nevalee Hornung-Looney Avatar

    Big brother is watching you…collecting data

    1. Stacey Keegan Avatar

      haha we all know this but yet we stay logged on

  4. Linda Soule Gregory Avatar

    One more reason to not get an iphone.

  5. Karen Padilla Avatar

    And people complained about the government watching our phones. WTF? How did that get approval. I refuse to give them my phone number when they keep asking. No thanks.

  6. Tod Heckert Avatar

    just one more reason I don’t use any FB apps. and will not use FB on my phone. Fuck them

  7. Greg Nold Avatar
    Greg Nold

    One more reason to quit Facebook completely and get your life back.

    Years ago, I was temporarily suspended from Facebook because I called a person an idiot (go figure, an ‘idiot’, not even a real cuss-word!) and she reported me. I was given a two-day suspension which really angered me. After a day of feeling disconnected, I actually started to enjoy not worrying whether my photos, comments and shared stories would be ‘Liked’ by others or not. I realized that so much of what I was doing in my life was for the ‘approval’ of my Facebook friends, and I then saw FB for the controlling bullshit it obviously still is.

    When my suspension was lifted I stayed off FB for weeks and never missed it. When I finally returned, it was only to tell all my FB Friends I was leaving for good. I exchanged emails with those who wanted to remain in contact (Adele and Dave in England and Kamila in NYC) then deleted my account and lived MUCH happier ever after.

    If I ever meet Mark Zuckerberg someday, I’ll shake his hand and thank him personally for kicking me off Facebook. My life is BETTER for it.