DIY Photography

Your one stop shop for everything photo-video

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

Submit A Story

Virginia court rules that stealing photographs for commercial websites is “fair use”

Jul 2, 2018 by John Aldred 17 Comments

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Well, this one has some potentially scary consequences for photographers rights, as well as other copyright holders. The case involves an image created by photographer Russell Brammer in 2011, stolen in 2016, and then taken, cropped and used by Violent Hues Productions, LLC on their website to promote a film festival.

The logic of this is so complexly stupid that it’s going to take a minute to try and explain.

  • 2011 – Photographer Russell Brammer shoots a timelapse photograph in Washington, D. C.
  • 2016 – Brammer applies for copyright registration on the image
  • 2016 – The image is discovered on the web by VHP, taken, cropped, and posted on their website to help promote a film festival
  • 2017 – Brammer sends a cease & desist letter to VHP
  • 2017 – VHP remove the image from their website
  • 2017 – Brammer pursues VHP in court for copyright infringement
  • 2017 – Defendant claims “fair use”
  • 2018 – Judge agrees with defendant that the work is “transformative” and “fair use”

Brammer pursued VHP on two counts. The first being the infringement itself, the second beg for alteration of the image and removal of copyright information. Now a judge in the Eastern District of Virginia has ruled that photographs are “factual depictions”, not creative, and that copying them, apparently even for commercial use, falls under “fair use”.

The problem though, according to Nova Southeastern University, that the court completely ignored key components of the Copyright Act. They also seem to have completely misunderstood the meaning of “transformative use”. According to the court opinion document…

The Fourth Circuit has held that “[t]he use of a copyrighted work need not alter or augment the work to be transformative. Rather, it can be transformative in function or purpose without altering or actually adding to the original work.”

Essentially they’re saying that simply using an image in a different context, even if you don’t change a thing in the image itself, makes it transformative, thus “fair use”. Well, doesn’t that pretty much make all stock photography a free-for-all? I mean, there the same images are used in all kinds of different contexts.

Violent Hues’ use of the photograph was transformative in function and purpose. While Brammer’s purpose in capturing and publishing the photograph was promotional and expressive, Violent Hues’ purpose in using the photograph was informational: to provide festival attendees with information regarding the local area. Furthermore, this use was non-commercial, because the photo was not used to advertise a product or generate revenue.

Yes, that’s right, this image used on a commercial website to promote a commercial film festival is non-commercial use, according to the judge.

Oh yeah, and it seems “I found it on the web” is a valid legal excuse for stealing images now. Interns and “the web guy” the world over can now breathe a collective sigh of relief.

In addition to being transformative and non-commercial, Violent Hues’ use of the photo was also in good faith. The record indicates that Mr. Mico, Violent Hues’ owner, found the photo online and saw no indication that it was copyrighted. Mr. Mico attests that he thus believed the photo was publically available. This good faith is further confirmed by the fact that as soon as Violent Hues learned that the photo may potentially be copyrighted, it removed the photo from its website.

Law Fuel reports that even though “good faith” and “innocent intent” may actually determine how much a party is liable for, they are not admissible as evidence of non-infringement or fair use. So, legally, ignorance is no excuse – although this judge seems to think otherwise.

It’s a crazy one to try and wrap your head around just what this judge might have been thinking. But if you want to read more about the case…

  • Case Docket
  • Court Opinion
  • Opinion Summary
  • Nova Southeastern University’s take
  • Law Fuel’s response to the ruling

There’s no word yet on whether or not Brammer will appeal this ruling, although I highly suspect that he will, as it may have dire consequences for copyright everywhere if left unchallenged.

[via Nova Southeastern University]

FIND THIS INTERESTING? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS!

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Related posts:

U.S. Appeals Court rules you CAN’T just take images off the web and reuse them under “Fair Use” Record label blasts photographer after stealing her photographs German Court Rules It Illegal to Possess Nude Photos of Your Ex Media companies can’t use your social media photos without permission, court rules

Filed Under: news Tagged With: copyright, Russell Brammer, Theft, Violent Hues, Virginia

John Aldred: from diyphotography.net

About John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

« Light might soon announce a smartphone with nine cameras
On solitude: why you have the best photography ideas in the shower »

Submit A Story

Get our FREE Lighting Book

DIYP lighting book cover

* download requires newsletter signup
DIYPhotography

Recent Comments

Free Resources

Advanced lighting book

Recent Posts

  • Here’s a bullet time video booth you can build yourself
  • Ricoh has discontinued the HD PENTAX-DA 21mm F3.2AL Limited silver lens
  • This “stellar flower” unravels the twilight’s evolution in 360 degrees
  • Strobes vs Continuous LEDs – Which is right for you?
  • Wave goodbye to Apple’s My Photo Stream next month

Udi Tirosh: from diyphotography.netUdi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Alex Baker: from diyphotography.netAlex Baker is a portrait and lifestyle driven photographer based in Valencia, Spain. She works on a range of projects from commercial to fine art and has had work featured in publications such as The Daily Mail, Conde Nast Traveller and El Mundo, and has exhibited work across Europe

David Williams: from diyphotography.netDave Williams is an accomplished travel photographer, writer, and best-selling author from the UK. He is also a photography educator and published Aurora expert. Dave has traveled extensively in recent years, capturing stunning images from around the world in a modified van. His work has been featured in various publications and he has worked with notable brands such as Skoda, EE, Boeing, Huawei, Microsoft, BMW, Conde Nast, Electronic Arts, Discovery, BBC, The Guardian, ESPN, NBC, and many others.

John Aldred: from diyphotography.netJohn Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Dunja Djudjic: from diyphotography.netDunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2023 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy