DIY Photography

Hacking Photography - one Picture at a time

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

 
@diyphotography

Telegram Me

Instagram

Submit A Story

You can’t republish a photo even if it’s freely accessible online, EU court rules

Share
Tweet
August 8, 2018 by Dunja Djudjic 4 Comments

If you see a photo freely available online and want to reuse it – you have to ask the photographer for the permission. Some would say this is a common knowledge, right? But the European Court of Justice has recently made this a ruling after a case of copyright infringement. And it all started as a high school student’s presentation.

A student at a secondary school in Germany downloaded a photo which was freely accessible on a travel website. He used it to illustrate his school presentation, but the problem arose when his school published the same photo on its website.

The photographer who took the photo, Dirk Renckhoff, found his image on the school’s website. He required the court to prohibit the further reproduction of his photo and claimed €400 ($460) damages for copyright infringement. The reason is that he only allowed the travel website to use it, but not the school, too.

As you might have expected, the court ruled in photographer’s favor. According to the EU’s Copyright Directive, “the author of a work has the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any communication to the public of that work.” Even if the photo was published on one website without any download restrictions – you are still not allowed to download it and post it elsewhere unless you have the consent from the author. Any use of the work without the author’s consent will be considered copyright infringement, the court statement reads.

Personally, I think it’s a no-brainer who’s in the right here. Just like the court ruled, you can’t download a photo just because it’s downloadable and use it without asking the author for the permission. However, the courts don’t always rule in favor of photographers. Just remember the recent case from Virginia: a film festival downloaded, altered and used a photo without permission for commercial purposes. However, the court ruled that it was “fair use.” But hopefully, not many more copyright infringement cases will end like this one.

[via Politico]

Share
Tweet

Related posts:

U.S. Post must pay $3.5 million for using wrong Lady Liberty photo on a stamp Painter Found Guilty Of Plagiarism For Painting A Photo. Claims Format And Color Contrasts Are Different Plant retailer awarded $900K by federal jury in copyright case over stolen photos Your photos may not be protected if copyright application is still in progress

Filed Under: news Tagged With: copyright, copyright infringement, copyright law, copyright protection, court

« Arri joins the vertical video trend – We are all doomed
Samsung is bringing cheap 4TB SSD drives to the masses »
  • Tj Ó Seamállaigh

    hmm €400.
    How much did he pay then for the ….. whatever lawyer, attorney thing?

    • Matthijs Bettman

      Probably nothing because of insurance 😉

  • Jeffrey Dull

    And another reason to move to Europe

  • Liam

    Good Judgement EU! In North America I’ve even had photos of ‘used gear for sale’ stolen and reused.

Popular on DIYP

  • This gif explains how changing focal length impacts a portrait
  • This unexpected Lightroom slider helps making perfect black and white conversions
  • Apple makes a Bokeh commercial, uses “bokeh” as a verb and pronounces it wrong
  • This photographer dismantled a real Lamborghini Miura for his amazing Disintegrating Cars series
  • This epic video is what happens when a pro racing drone pilot turns on the camera
  • Stop Instagram from ruining your videos with this easy technique
  • Is a $600 boom pole worth it? Try a $10 broom pole instead
  • How to shoot those crazy dance floor light streak photos with flash
  • Tamron to launch wide angle 17-28mm f/2.8 Zoom for Sony FE
  • This epic 81-megapixel moon photo was stacked from 50,000 images

Recent Comments


Previous Polls

Dunja Djudjic is a writer and photographer from Novi Sad, Serbia. You can see her work on Flickr, Behance and her Facebook page.

John Aldred is based in Scotland and photographs animals in the studio and people in the wild.

You can find out more about John on his website and follow his adventures on YouTube and Facebook.

JP Danko is a commercial photographer based in Toronto, Canada. JP
can change a lens mid-rappel, swap a memory card while treading water, or use a camel as a light stand.

To see more of his work please visit his studio website blurMEDIAphotography, or follow him on Twitter, 500px, Google Plus or YouTube.

JP’s photography is available for licensing at Stocksy United.

Clinton Lofthouse is a Photographer, Retoucher and Digital Artist based in the United Kingdom, who specialises in creative retouching and composites. Proud 80's baby, reader of graphic novels and movie geek!
Find my work on My website or follow me on Facebook or My page

Recent Posts

  • This is the best explanation on the Internet about what dual ISO is and how it affects dynamic range
  • This epic 81-megapixel moon photo was stacked from 50,000 images
  • Original raw Star Wars footage highlights the impact of good sound design – Also, Han totally shot first
  • Landscape photography is NOT a competition
  • This unexpected Lightroom slider helps making perfect black and white conversions

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2019 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy