DIY Photography

Your one stop shop for everything photo-video

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

Submit A Story

Media companies can’t use your social media photos without permission, court rules

Dec 13, 2018 by Dunja Djudjic 1 Comment

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Back in June 2017, a photo of Donald Trump crashing a wedding at his golf course resort went viral.  Jonathan Otto took the photo, shared it with a wedding guest, and it quickly got all over the internet – and ended up in the media. After Otto found it out, he filed a lawsuit. And recently, the court ruled that media using a snapshot from someone’s social network doesn’t constitute a fair use.

The Hollywood Reporter describes how the image got to become viral. After Otto snapped it with his iPhone, he shared it with another wedding guest Sean Burke, who apparently sent it to others. One of the guests posted it to Instagram, and this is where the media companies discovered it. Only a day after the wedding, the photo appeared in the media outlets such as TMZ, CNN, The Washington Post, and the Daily Mail.

President Trump: Wedding Crasher (PHOTOS) https://t.co/1BvSurYvVQ

— TMZ (@TMZ) June 11, 2017

Realizing that his photo was used in the media, Otto first asked Burke if he had posted the image, but it turned out to be a relative of the bride. Otto also tweeted to TMZ, asking for credit or compensation. According to the court documents, Otto registered the photo with the Copyright Office a day after it went viral.

This is my original photo @TMZ – where is credit/compensation? Someone at event with me obviously shared without permission – please DM me. pic.twitter.com/wGibY0vI8h

— Jonathan Otto (@OttoJon) June 11, 2017

The image ended up on Esquire, too (but at the time of writing this, it appears to have been removed). Otto filed a lawsuit against them, and the court recently ruled in his favor: Hearst Communications, Esquire’s parent company, is ruled liable for copyright infringement. The news company argued that it was “transformative use,” considering that Otto snapped the photo for personal use, and Esquire used it for news. But the U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Woods disagrees:

“Stealing a copyrighted photograph to illustrate a news article, without adding new understanding or meaning to the work, does not transform its purpose — regardless of whether that photograph was created for commercial or personal use.”

The judged called in “antithetical” for media companies to simply steal personal images and claim fair use if their articles only recite factual information, “much of which can be gleaned from the photograph itself.” He added that this would discourage amateur photographers from creating works. Also, “there would be no incentive for publishers to create their own content to illustrate articles,” judge adds.

The court decision also explained that, just because Otto is an amateur photographer with an iPhone, this doesn’t mean he has no right to sell his work. As far as I know, his image should be automatically protected by copyright even if he never registers it. But, registering the image makes it easier to file a lawsuit in case it gets stolen.

And when it comes to fair use, there are some pretty clear rules what falls under it. However, transformative use is still kinda “gray area,” with lots of room for interpretation and discussion. This is why I believe Hearst tried to play on the card of “transformative use.” But they were out of luck, apparently. So now, it seems that this case will change some things for both photographers and news outlets. If nothing else, it serves as a warning not to use the term “transformative use” too loosely.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Otto can be entitled to statutory damages (typically $30,000-$50,000, but it can go up to $150,000). Alternatively, he may take actual damages and profits attributable to the infringement.

[via The Hollywood Reporter]

FIND THIS INTERESTING? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS!

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Related posts:

the social media fallacyThe Social Media Fallacy – Does Social Media Generate Business Income? Court orders Canon Italia to remove Elia Locardi’s image from their social media pages State Supreme Court rules digital cameras can’t be searched without a warrant Dentist’s photos of patients’ teeth can be protected by copyright, court rules

Filed Under: news Tagged With: copyright, copyright infringement, copyright law, copyright protection, court, media, photography copyright, social media

Dunja Djudjic: from diyphotography.net

About Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

« The first images of the sports and wildlife-focused Olympus E-M1X have leaked
sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB – Which you should use, when and why »

Submit A Story

Get our FREE Lighting Book

DIYP lighting book cover

* download requires newsletter signup
DIYPhotography

Recent Comments

Free Resources

Advanced lighting book

Recent Posts

  • Peak Design’s Micro Clutch is the perfect solution for holding small cameras
  • SmallRig PowerADC brings USB charging to Canon, Sony and Fujifilm batteries
  • Irix announces native E mount versions of its 15mm f/2.4 and 150mm macro lenses
  • SheClicks launches brand new Women in Photography podcast
  • Expert advice for photographers: How to use Google Search Console

Udi Tirosh: from diyphotography.netUdi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Alex Baker: from diyphotography.netAlex Baker is a portrait and lifestyle driven photographer based in Valencia, Spain. She works on a range of projects from commercial to fine art and has had work featured in publications such as The Daily Mail, Conde Nast Traveller and El Mundo, and has exhibited work across Europe

David Williams: from diyphotography.netDave Williams is an accomplished travel photographer, writer, and best-selling author from the UK. He is also a photography educator and published Aurora expert. Dave has traveled extensively in recent years, capturing stunning images from around the world in a modified van. His work has been featured in various publications and he has worked with notable brands such as Skoda, EE, Boeing, Huawei, Microsoft, BMW, Conde Nast, Electronic Arts, Discovery, BBC, The Guardian, ESPN, NBC, and many others.

John Aldred: from diyphotography.netJohn Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Dunja Djudjic: from diyphotography.netDunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2023 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy