Samsung announces a $1,600 43-inch vertical TV for the smartphone generation

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

So, Samsung has gone and done it. They’ve singlehandedly destroyed the “You don’t watch TV vertically do you? So, why do you shoot video vertically?” argument. Yes, they’ve announced a vertical TV. And it costs $1,600 (not $16,000 as some sources are reporting).

The Samsung Sero is a 43″ vertical TV allowing users to watch their content in the same way as they do on their phone. Content such as Snapchat and Instagram Stories, IGTV and whatever other vertical content people watch on their phones.

At the moment, it’s only going to become available in Korea, which makes sense as that’s where Samsung is based, for ₩1.89 million (around $1,600). It’s a smart TV to which you can cast your mobile device (I’m guessing Android only, given that Samsung doesn’t make iPhones) and Samsung says it’s designed to encourage young people to project more of their smartphone content onto the TV.

There is a saving grace, though, it can be rotated horizontally, too, for when you want to watch… you know, normal video content.

The Sero was presented at a “pop up store” in Seoul, Korea, and is expected to start shipping at some point during May, in Korea. It features a built-in microphone and Samsung’s virtual assistant, Bixby. It can also be set up as a giant photo frame, or as a clock.

There’s no word yet on whether or not it will start selling in the rest of the world. I suppose it will depend on whether or not it takes off in Korea.

[via BBC]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 responses to “Samsung announces a $1,600 43-inch vertical TV for the smartphone generation”

  1. Ignasi Jacob Avatar
    Ignasi Jacob
  2. Mezame Shashin-ka Avatar
    Mezame Shashin-ka

    $1600? I thought it was $16000. Gah. Disappointing. So much for wanting to show people I can buy a $16000 TV. I guess it’s a no then. :X haha

  3. Eman Be Avatar
    Eman Be

    Wow that’s cheaper than that double screen flip phone.

  4. Don Pierson Avatar
    Don Pierson

    I guess for those who want to see TV and movies in 9:16 mode. They’ll have to squint to watch a letterbox movie

  5. Rafael A. P. Maduro Avatar
    Rafael A. P. Maduro

    Wao my Asus 32 inch monitor can be used in either direction but I’ll buy that Samsung TV

  6. Вергунов Сергей Avatar
    Вергунов Сергей

    Thanks, I will not buy.

  7. Kryn Sporry Avatar
    Kryn Sporry

    Ehm, isn’t that just a tv on its side with the image flipped 90 degrees in the menu?

    1. Justin Presley Avatar
      Justin Presley

      Video panels refresh at different speeds horizontal vs vertical, it’s a lot more complex than just flipping the image and the tv and calling it a day, but yea, kinda stupid.

  8. Lithgow 'wub Wub' Wilson Avatar
    Lithgow ‘wub Wub’ Wilson

    for all those snapchat/instagram vertical videos of course… what the actual fuck.

  9. Lithgow 'wub Wub' Wilson Avatar
    Lithgow ‘wub Wub’ Wilson

    tetris?!

  10. Joe De Diego Avatar
    Joe De Diego

    wtf

  11. Gary Sthland Avatar
    Gary Sthland

    That’ll be $4k in NZ