DIY Photography

Your one stop shop for everything photo-video

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

Submit A Story

The new Samyang 35mm f/1.4 goes head-to-head against the Sony Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/1.4

Nov 17, 2017 by Hanna Saba 8 Comments

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

The release of the new Samyang 35mm f1.4 autofocus lens for the Sony E mount system has grabbed everyone’s attention. Owning both this lens as well as the Sony Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4, I have been constantly asked to do a comparison review. In this comparison, I will go through everything showing the differences between the lenses.

  • 1:00 – Build Quality
  • 6:29 – AF for video and stills
  • 11:40 – Bokeh
  • 14:50 – Vignetting
  • 16:03 – Sharpness
  • 21:18 – CA & Lens flare

Build Quality

One of the main differences between these 2 lenses is the price. The Zeiss 35mm f1.4 retails for $2244 AUD and the Samyang 35mm f1.4 is retailed for $949. The Samyang is over half the price of the Sony Zeiss. The Sony Zeiss has a robust and weatherproof metal construction with a versatile aperture ring, smooth and silent AF operation and Zeiss t* anti-reflective coating. The focus ring is smooth with resistance which is great for those who use manual focus. The Sony Zeiss has 12 elements in 8 groups gving that great bokeh at f1.4 weighing just 630g, with a length without lens cap of 112mm. Accepting a 72mm filter thread and giving an angular field view on full frame of 63º.

The Samyang build is mostly metal with a bit of plastic, this lens doesn’t come with an aperture ring like the zeiss. The focus ring is smoother than the Zeiss lens and has a bit of resistance. With 11 elements in 9 groups also giving a great bokeh shooting wide open. The Samyang is a bit heavier and a bit taller than the Zeiss, weighing 705g and with a length without lens cap of 115mm. The filter size is smaller on the Samyang accepting filters at 67mm. The Samyang has a wider angle view to the Zeiss on a full frame at 65.5º getting more in frame.

All Images are straight from camera without any editing

Bokeh

Both Samyang and Zeiss shooting at f1.4 have an identical bokeh shape which I found was hard to tell, both have perfect circle bokehs in centre and on the edges it becomes slight oval shaped. The difference in their bokeh is the pattern inside it. Below are images shot at f1.4

Samyang 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4

The Samyang bokeh is smooth with circle rings inside.

Sony Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4

The Zeiss bokeh has a pattern with circle rings inside of it.

At f2 the Samyang bokeh in the centre starts to have a slight change to a hexagon shape whereas the Zeiss still retains that circle in the centre.

Samyang at f/2

Samyang at f/2

Sony Zeiss at f2

Sony Zeiss at f2

At f2.2 the Sony Zeiss starts to change slightly in it’s shape, but once stopped down to f2.8 Both Samyang and Zeiss have an identical shape in their bokeh becoming more of a hexagon shape. The Samyang at f2.8 has a larger bokeh than the Zeiss.

Samyang at f/2.8

Samyang at f/2.8

Sony Zeiss at f/2.8

Sony Zeiss at f/2.8

Autofocus

Both Samyang and Zeiss performed really well with autofocus. Both AF are fast and accurate whether in great light conditions or in low light, it was hard for me to tell the difference in speed between the two. EYE-AF works like a charm with both these lenses and using Eye-AF in continuous mode it kept up with the moving subject.
For video, Both AF kept up well, but the difference where I noticed is the Samyang lens as a slight noise in the AF where you can hear it if you are not using a mic whereas the Zeiss is completely silent. Once you have a mic mounted on the camera I couldn’t hear any visible signs of the AF motor. I did on the AF test placed my wireless mic next to the lens during the AF test for still and could barely hear anything. There is definitely an improvement with Samyang lens with AF compared to their other lenses. It is faster and quieter than the others. Do check out my youtube video where I get in more detailed with the test especially with AF.

Sharpness

Both Samyang and Zeiss are both sharp in the centre, But when you look at the corners the Zeiss is sharper than the Samyang at f1.4.

Samyang at f/1.4

Samyang at f/1.4 – Centre

Samyang at f/1.4 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/1.4

Sony Zeiss at f/1.4 – Centre

Sony Zeiss at f/1.4 – Corner

Once stopped down at f2.2 the Zeiss becomes a lot sharper in the centre and also picks up on the sharpness in the corners whereas size is still a bit soft in the corners.

Samyang at f/2.2

Samyang at f/2.2 – Centre

Samyang at f/2.2 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/2.2

Sony Zeiss at f/2.2 – Centre

Sony Zeiss at f/2.2 – Corner

The Samyang gets sharper at f2.5 in the centre. While the Zeiss gets a lot sharper in the corner and the Samyang is still a bit soft.

Samyang at f/2.5

Samyang at f/2.5 – Corner

Samyang at f/2.5 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/2.5

Sony Zeiss at f/2.5 – Centre

Sony Zeiss at f/2.5 – Corner

At f4 The Zeiss gets extremely sharp in the corners while the Samyang starts to get the words in the corner in focus.

Samyang at f/4 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/4 – Corner

Shooting at f5.6 the Samyang gets sharper in the corners but once you go down to f8 the corners are extremely sharp for the Samyang. The zeiss is a tad sharper at f8 oppose to the Samyang.

Samyang at f/8 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/8 – Corner

Vignetting

Both Samyang and Zeiss have a slight vignetting when shooting at f1.4. The Zeiss starts to show no signs of vignetting at f2.2, the Samyang lessens with the vignetting at f2.2 but shows no visible signs of vignetting at f3.2.

Samyang at f/1.4

Samyang at f/1.4 – Corner

Zeiss at f/1.4

Zeiss at f/1.4 – Corner

Samyang at f/2.2

Samyang at f/2.2 – Corner

Zeiss at f/2.2

Zeiss at f/2.2 – Corner

Samyang at f/3.2

Samyang at f/3.2 – Corner

Sony Zeiss at f/3.2

Sony Zeiss at f/3.2 – Corner

Chromatic Aberration

Both Zeiss and Samyang have a bit of colour fringing/CA. I don’t noticed it in all my images but only some. It just depends on the highlights in the image. But that has not been an issue for me as you can remove it in Photoshop or Lightroom.

Samyang f/1.4

Samyang at f/1.4 – 100% Crop

Zeiss f/1.4

Zeiss f/1.4 – 100% crop

Samyang f/1.4

Samyang f/1.4 – 100% crop

Sony Zeiss f/1.4

Sony Zeiss f/1.4 – 100% crop

Flaring

I have shot against the sun in the right-hand corner of the image to see if I can get any lens flare. This image is the first image that managed to get some sort of lens flare in the Samyang lens. Which I didn’t mind as I kinda liked the effect it did. The Sony Zeiss gives more rays of light opposed to that lens flare.

Samyang f/1.4

Sony Zeiss f/1.4

Conclusion

Both Samyang and Zeiss performed really well, with Autofocus and bokeh been really hard to tell. Both lenses do have CA/colour fringing but just depends on the highlights. Where the Zeiss wins is in its sharpness especially with corners. For over half the price of the Samyang lens, you are getting a great affordable lens at f1.4 that performs exceptionally well.

I have used the Samyang 35mm f1.4 AF lens during 2 weddings for the whole day and I have to say this lens performed really well. The AF was fast and accurate and not missing any shots. Love the image quality this lens produces. Below are some images captured from the weddings.

Sony A7SII + Samyang 35mm f1.4 – ISO 100, f1.4, 1/2500

Sony A7SII + Samyang 35mm f1.4 – ISO 100, f1.4, 1/250

Sony A7RII + Samyang 35mm f1.4 – ISO 100, f3.5, 1/5000

Sony A7RII + Samyang 35mm f1.4 – ISO 100, f1.4, 1/2500

The Samyang 35mm f/1.4 FE lens for Sony E is available to buy now for US$799.

About the Author

Hanna Saba is a wedding and portrait photographer based in Australia. You can find out more about Hanna on his website, and follow his work on Facebook and Instagram.

FIND THIS INTERESTING? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS!

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Related posts:

1998 Canon D2000 Goes Head-To-Head Against The 2015 Canon 5DSR The 2016 MacBook Pro goes head-to-head against its predecessor in this video editing comparison Feiyu goes head-to-head against DJI with their new Pocket Handheld Gimbal camera The Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 goes up against the twice-the-price Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8

Filed Under: Gear Tagged With: 35mm f/1.4, Hanna Saba, Samyang, Samyang 35mm f/1.4, sony, Sony 35mm f/1.4, Zeiss 35mm f/1.4

Guest Author: from diyphotography.net

About Guest Author

This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

« How DJI’s new AeroScope rogue drone detection system finds you and your drone
Thoughts on photographing “other women” »

Submit A Story

Get our FREE Lighting Book

DIYP lighting book cover

* download requires newsletter signup
DIYPhotography

Recent Comments

Free Resources

Advanced lighting book

Recent Posts

  • “I prefer using smaller cameras” – an unorthodox take on size
  • A pigeon scares a meteorologist as it photobombs a live camera
  • Photographer files lawsuit against NFL receiver and teams after shoving incident
  • Comparing iPhone 13 vs iPhone 14 for astrophotography
  • Don’t buy a Z8 directly from Nikon, customers say

Udi Tirosh: from diyphotography.netUdi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Alex Baker: from diyphotography.netAlex Baker is a portrait and lifestyle driven photographer based in Valencia, Spain. She works on a range of projects from commercial to fine art and has had work featured in publications such as The Daily Mail, Conde Nast Traveller and El Mundo, and has exhibited work across Europe

David Williams: from diyphotography.netDave Williams is an accomplished travel photographer, writer, and best-selling author from the UK. He is also a photography educator and published Aurora expert. Dave has traveled extensively in recent years, capturing stunning images from around the world in a modified van. His work has been featured in various publications and he has worked with notable brands such as Skoda, EE, Boeing, Huawei, Microsoft, BMW, Conde Nast, Electronic Arts, Discovery, BBC, The Guardian, ESPN, NBC, and many others.

John Aldred: from diyphotography.netJohn Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Dunja Djudjic: from diyphotography.netDunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2023 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy