Mandatory drone registration is coming to the UK

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

It may have recently been tested and defeated in the American courts, but drone registration is coming to the UK. The government have announced plans to introduce the registration along with “safety awareness courses” for owners of SUAs (Small Unmanned Aircraft). This registration, they say, will be required for anything weighing more than 250g (~8oz).

The BBC report that DJI have weighed in and are in favour of these measures. They have not announced a timeframe, nor plans on exactly how the rules will be enforced. The Department of Transport told the BBC that “the nuts and bolts still have to be ironed out”.

Aviation Minister, Lord Martin Callanan, told the BBC that the measures “prioritise protecting the public while maximising the full potential of drones”. And then there’s a video going on about the 250g weight limit being the limit before putting helicopters at risk.

The BBC state that there has not been a single significant accident in the UK involving a drone. And that there have been several reports of near misses with commercial aircraft and drones delivering drugs into prisons. Well, both of those things are already illegal. A registration system wouldn’t prevent it.

We’re about risk mitigation. We don’t want to stop people enjoying themselves. So, we did some quite extensive safety tests to see what size of drones actually present a risk to aircraft, etc. and 250g was the limit of drones that can present a risk to helicopters

– Lord Martin Callanan, Aviation Minister

I’m mixed feelings about this. Especially as they still don’t really know how they’re going to implement or enforce it. I don’t mind the idea of registration, in principle, because it’ll put a lot of the idiots off. Of course, even more idiots will simply fly without registering, too. It didn’t seem to stop people doing stupid things with drones while registration was mandatory in the USA. I just think it’s a wasted exercise.

Compulsory “safety awareness tests”, though? If it’s a simple online test where it asks you questions, you enter answers, and it’s a straight pass or fail, then it probably won’t be so bad. But I can’t imagine it’ll be that straightforward. The British Government doesn’t like to make anything that easy these days. It won’t stop people who are going to fly illegally anyway, and it certainly won’t fix stupid.

Even if registration becomes mandatory to purchase a drone, they’re so easy to build. There’s nothing to stop anybody ordering a bunch of parts online and building their own to bypass registration.

The fact is that there are multiple users of the airspace and the public should have access to the air – we firmly believe that – but you need systems to make sure everybody can do it safely.

In all of these issues the question is, where is the reasonable middle ground? Banning drones is unreasonable, having no rules is also unreasonable.

– Adam Lisberg, DJI

Except, there are rules already.

There are no fly zones. Line of sight is a legal requirement. There’s regulations about maximum altitude, how close you can fly to people, vehicles, roads, and buildings. Registration will not prevent people from breaking the rules that are already in place. I’ve no idea how they think it will prevent them from being broken in the future.

The UK Government have not said whether this will also apply to more traditional model aircraft, such as planes and helicopters.

[via BBC]


Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 responses to “Mandatory drone registration is coming to the UK”

  1. John James Avatar
    John James

    https://www.recode.net/2017/5/19/15663436/us-drone-registration-rules-faa
    Americans NO LONGER have to register non-commercial drones with the FAA

    1. Kaouthia Avatar
      Kaouthia

      Yes, I mentioned that in the first sentence. :)

  2. Mike Randall Avatar

    It will work in the U.K. because they are used to having personal liberties infringed upon, i.e. compulsory DNA samples (over 10% of the population so far and 30,000 samples per week).

    1. John Aldred Avatar

      You mean the proposal that was rejected 9 years ago?

    2. Mike Randall Avatar

      No. The other one.

    3. John Woodhead Avatar

      Compulsory DNA samples? The only time your DNA or fingerprint is held on record is when you’re convicted of an offence. You’ve got no idea what you’re talking about.

    4. Mike Randall Avatar

      Samples are taken from all suspects, and if you believe they are deleted after the suspects are cleared, stick with your beliefs.

    5. Marc Stokes Avatar

      you know infowars is mostly bullshit right?

    6. Vanitas Foto Avatar
      Vanitas Foto

      Stop reading alt right nazi news Mike..

  3. Chris Lapointe Avatar

    First Brexit, now this ???

  4. Kryn Sporry Avatar

    …because in the UK they’re anal about rules and regulations, especially when it concerns health and safety (which is pretty much the core rationale behind it all)

    1. ziplock9000 Avatar
      ziplock9000

      Being able to place blame on someone who nearly causes a plane to crash killing 100’s is anal about health and safety? That is the most stupid comment I’ve ever seen on the internet. STFU

  5. Randy Kasal Avatar

    Because Brits are under constant video surveilance and willingly give up freedoms. Because they can do nothing about it.

    1. Vanitas Foto Avatar
      Vanitas Foto

      Because asking people to own their responsibility with their fly-fly toys is bad… Yeah…

  6. Angelina Wiese Devine Avatar

    It seems to work fine in Denmark

    1. Andrew Symington Avatar

      Danes are rational though, this is a country informed by Murdoch and Putin now.

  7. Jamie Brightmore Avatar

    The layman RPAS owner needs to have knowledge of the rules, basic safety measures, and critically: situational awareness. The biggest risk to the public are idiots flying near airports, over large crowds, and not being aware of things like light aircraft, gliders, helicopters, pylons, trees, etc. The airport thing is a problem that will take some time to sort out. Mandatory geo fencing is at least something that is helping a bit with the newer DJI systems, but there’s a shit ton of older drones available to buy for little cost with weaker safety and zero geo fencing on board. Aside from reckless flying behaviour, the biggest point of failure in terms of the current technology are batteries. Companies like DJI need to do more to educate their customers on how to monitor and maintain them + all systems should have dual redundancy going forward. In terms of legislation, this is a step in the right direction by the gov. but it won’t be a magic bullet.

    1. Lee Pretious Avatar

      Imma fly my mavic right up their buttholes

  8. ziplock9000 Avatar
    ziplock9000

    This was always coming, let’s be honest. As somebody that regularly complains about freedoms being taken away in the UK (Mostly internet), this is completely understandable tbh.