DIY Photography

Hacking Photography - one Picture at a time

Search

 

Submit A Story

This is the camera gear that NASA use on the International Space Station

by 22 Comments

iss_photography

From the moon landings to present day, one constant question that much of the world’s population has when it comes to space missions is their choice of camera equipment.

During the space race with the then U.S.S.R. of the 1960s, and using primarily Hasselblad cameras with 70mm film, NASA found that they needed more portable cameras for active situations.  This was when NASA’s long history with Nikon began, and they have been supplying NASA with camera equipment ever since.

Recently, in a Space Station Live stream, American astronaut Jeff Williams received the question again and went into some detail on the equipment they use on the ISS.

Known for the high level of detail they can capture, wide dynamic range, and high ISO performance, NASA’s weapon of choice today is the Nikon D4, of which the ISS houses several, along with a wide selection of Nikon lenses, including the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR shown in this image.

iss_d4_24-70

NASA range of lenses includes everything from super wide angle, to “several” of the massive Nikon 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR, which becomes 1120mm equivalent when used with the Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III 1.4x Teleconverter.

iss_d4_800

Towards the end of the video, Jeff shows us his Window on the World, through which he creates many of his photographs, and is the only point on the space station from which you can view the entire planet at once.

iss_window_on_the_world

Jeff also talks about some of the techniques used to create video from still images, by creating panoramic images which are panned in post to produce some amazing results.

Here is one of Jeff’s merged panoramas of the Andes Mountain Range coming up to the horizon.

And the resulting video, zoomed in and showing the kind of detail that can be captured with their Nikon equipment, even at this great distance.

You can follow more of Jeff Williams’ adventure over on Instagram and Facebook, or reach out, far out, to him through Twitter.  You can also keep track of the ISS on the Space Station Live Ustream feed.

Related posts:

It costs over $130,000 to deliver this $23,000 Nikon kit to the ISS NASA launches 10 Nikon D5 cameras on their first space mission Astronauts Aboard The ISS Immerse A GoPro Into A Floating Sphere Of Water How Nikon cameras “prove” that the Earth is flat
  • Frank Nazario

    Nikon…YES!

    • Someone important is using the same brand, I happen to be using… YES!
      This totally validates self worth, by associating myself with someone else!
      😀

      • Frank Nazario

        LOL… i’ve been using Nikon all my life (54) and I am happy that NASA uses Nikon glass and bodies as their photography solution.

      • Flodder

        especailly when you are a fat guy in midlife crisis like frank.

      • Cut him some slack, Gvido.

  • Laura Durant

  • MikeDF

    Given the lack (or very minimal) gravity was the camera modified in terms of the moving parts?
    And was it specially packed for the high G take-off when it was taken up?

    • Flodder

      your camera needs gravity to work?

    • Sean

      I’m sure everything sent up is packed tightly…don’t need no cameras bopping you in the head. And why would gravity be an issue? Only moving parts in a digital camera would be the mirror, lens iris blades and auto-focus gears. None of which are gravity driven.

  • Flodder

    they are in space.. and they have nothing better to show than the boring gear they brought up from earth?

  • Michael Chastain

    “and is the only point on the space station from which you can view the entire planet at once.”

    Surprisingly you can only see about 2.5% of the earth from the 205 mile high orbit of the ISS at any given time. Not exactly a correction, but I once assumed you’d be able to see something approaching half the earth from orbit and was shocked when I did the research and found out how little you can actually observe.

    To put that into perspective that’s an area about the size of the United States. By comparison at 40,000 feet in an airplane you can only see 0.01% of the earth. From 240,000 miles away on the moon you can see 49.2%.

  • Boring

  • David Hardman Sr.

    Some have declared that the earth is flat and state that the photos of earth are taken with fish eye lenses, giving it it’s curvature. Is this true? And does the earth have curvature viewed with the naked eye? Thank you!

    • Warren Taylor

      The flat earthers are among the most profoundly ignorant morons on the planet. They deny a fact that has been known to educated individuals for over 2,000 years. I find it distressing that some of these defective people probably reproduce, and that if they are over 18 and live in the U.S. their votes count the same as mine.

      • Darkside

        And people are wondering how on earth did the Orange Man get elected to the top office in the land.

      • Illu Sion

        how to get easy likes on a post by writing a comment that adds value to no one but everyone agree with.. way to go chammp

    • Teh Moose

      Yes. The Earth has curvature because its a sphere. I mean, duh.

  • Robert Bali

    Why use a 16MP camera? That just seems ridiculous. With a larger sensor you can use a regular lens (or a telephoto) and have much more options to crop. Sony’s A7r ii is a 42 MP camera and phase one has a 100MP camera. With 16MPs you are pretty limited. I’ve watch alot of these ISS space footage and they all seem the same. I wonder why they never show us the stars when they are in night. The sony a7s ii full frame sensor is incredible for low light and would be able to capture a never before footage of the stars or the moon when they are in night. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/01af801cf3558c2b04a0906d5be5ff91b8851b38785d3f79ca6e134c2778b416.jpg
    Also why not film the moon at night?
    It just seems like they show the same angles all the time.

    • Oliver Foxley

      Maybe Sony don’t cope well at launch. I know NASA switched from Canon for this reason, Fluorite in the lenses made them shatter. Nikon and Hasselblad have been solid for them. Agreed though they could still shoot 45 MP on Nikon anyway.

Recent Posts