Journalist Checks Beauty Concept By Having Herself Photoshopped In 40 Countries
Jul 1, 2014
Share:
Over the time, we’ve seen many here-is-a-picture-how-can-you-shop-it projects, but something sets Before & After apart. In this project, journalist Esther Honig took her unedited image and had it Photoshopped by 22 individuals so far.
Honing sent her image to about 40 retouch artists at varying levels from amateur to pro, and asked them to retouch her photo (seen right after the jump), with a simple single directive: “make me beautiful“. Contact came via several freelancing channels (most notably Fiverr) so work has been committed at rates between $5 and $30. This is pretty cheap for a pro retouch, but still the wide selection of skill and geographical locations provides a window into the concept of beauty as it is perceived in various regions of the world.
Honig shares that:
In the U.S. Photoshop has become a symbol of our society’s unobtainable standards for beauty. My project, Before & After, examines how these standards vary across cultures on a global level….
… Photoshop allows us to achieve our unobtainable standards of beauty, but when we compare those standards on a global scale, achieving the ideal remains all the more elusive
Here is the original photos sent by Honig:

and here are some of the resulting photos:






















[Before & After | Esther Honig]
Udi Tirosh
Udi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.





































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
10 responses to “Journalist Checks Beauty Concept By Having Herself Photoshopped In 40 Countries”
Better to view here with the slideshow next to the original. http://www.estherhonig.com/#!before–after-/cvkn
Is it odd that in every case I found the original the most beautiful? As a photographer, I generally “retouch” only for accuracy — removing a dust mote or occasionally a pimple or blotch (which is decidedly temporary).
not that odd, considering that most of the “retouching” is awful.
This is Photoshop at its worst and completed by amateurs. The “Research” involved paying each Photo Editor $5 (yes thats five dollars) via the Fiverr web site. You get what you pay for, in this case nonsense, and not a reflection of cultural mores.
Agreed. This is research into which country has the worst Photoshop skills
the adjustments to skin tone are sort of interesting, but the rest is total amateur hour.
I would LOVE to see their versions to whose who gave negative feed backs at the retuched photos.
since what you wrote doesn’t actually make any sense i assume you’re suggesting that people commenting negatively about the (honestly awful) retouching couldn’t do any better.
it’s a completely meaningless point, you don’t need to be good at retouching to tell an amateur’s work from something professionally done.
furthermore any kind of “research” assuming that any kind of meaningful insight into photo retouching could be had from paying 5$ for a retouched photo is a complete waste of time.
how much “work time” could 5$ buy from anyone not coming from a poor country?
5 minutes? 10 minutes? what can be honestly done in 5 minutes?
I think that this is a great idea, but the photoshopping is awful for even amateur level photoshoppers.
simple single directive: “make me beautiful“
I would have returned the original picture. :)