The king of compacts: Ricoh GR III vs. Fuji X100F

Jul 19, 2019

James Cater

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

The king of compacts: Ricoh GR III vs. Fuji X100F

Jul 19, 2019

James Cater

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

If you’re going to get serious about shooting all the time the best camera you can buy yourself is a quality compact. High End DSLRs and interchangeable lens mirrorless cameras can be intimidating to shoot with for the everyday, not to mention an unnecessarily heavy load to carry. A compact is a camera you can take everywhere, that will distinguish you from other ‘phonetographers’ in both improved control and image quality.

There are two premium compacts that I was stuck between; the Fuji X100F and Ricoh’s GRiii to take on my Trans-Siberian train trip.

Magnesium Fantastic Featherweight – 


GR cameras have a long history, with the initial design dating back to the GR1 released in 1996. Not much has changed much in its design, despite the digital update and tweaking to its sensor and software. Ricoh just got so much right into the prototype that there was little need to reinvent the wheel. They simply made a camera as small as possible while maintaining a top tier standard for the lens and not sacrificing ergonomics. The GR design was and still is considered to be one of the great achievements of camera design in the 20th century by many.

The ‘Mini Leica’- 


The X100F’s design, by contrast is relatively more recent- originating to the X100 of 2010. But its inspiration is drawn from some of the best classic cameras. From the body you can see the Leica M3, the Nikon F cameras and the Olympus Trip have all made their mark on its incredibly beautiful and neat design. From this, and its amazing image quality owing to the fantastic Fujinon EBC lens and X-Trans sensor, has earned a reputation for being one of the worlds best compact cameras.

I took both cameras out to trial, and found deciding between them extremely difficult. They are both fantastic but very different cameras made for the similar purpose of street and travel photography. It came down to the wire for me, so let’s get to what sets these apart, and how I reached my decision by going through the scorecard:


So just like the X-Pro, of which to I’m accustomed, focusing with the X100F is made easy with an incredible AF system. The single and wide tracking focus points work great, but for me the hybrid manual setting was what I kept it in most of the time. By hybrid, I mean that you can keep manual control, but when you want to focus just press the AF button on the back (positioned perfectly for your thumb) and bang, your in focus. This back button focus is exactly what I use for my DSLR shooting and it’s incredibly versatile, especially for street shooting.

Zone focus is made incredibly easy with the focus peaking. You can prejudge your distance, get a representation of it and your ready to start shooting from the hip. Can’t be easier than that, right? Wrong- the GRiii blows it out of the water.

For fast paced street shooting, the GR uses snap focus settings. You can fix it to automatically focus on objects within a set ranges. This is incredibly fast and intuitive if you know how to use it correctly, and was the only way I shot while using the camera. I just click it into 2m focus zone and keep the camera at f8 (super deep DOF especially with an APSC) and basically I never miss a shot, even from the hip. With no manual focus ring that may slip out zone while its resting in my pocket or in a bag, you know you’re always ready to shoot at your preset distance- no peaking at the screen or EVF required.

Easy focusing is such a crucial part of street and travel photography that right off the bat the GRiii has earned itself 2 points for its excellent system. More cameras need this feature.


FUJI : 0



As with all Fuji X series the Image Quailty is fantastic. The 23mm F2 Fujinon stands shoulder to shoulder with my much more expensive Summicron 35mm – I have even taken to reducing the sharpness on my JPEG settings to get a softer, more filmic look. That X-Trans Sensor APSC sensor is phenomenal, as I already knew from my experience with X-T10 and the X-Pro, so no surprises here. Skin tones in particular, always look amazing with Fuji and are probably marginally better than what the GRiii.

As far as pixel peeping goes, the GRiii’s toe to toe with the X100F. It seems that a fantastic lens paired with a 24M sensor makes for some seriously eye popping pictures, no matter who the manufacturer is.

While technically as good as each other, the Fuji and the Ricoh render JPEGs in a very different way. While both can be customised, just as a matter of personal taste, I prefer the factory setting of the GRiii. One of the big differences for me is the green spectrum. In the default modes- Fuji JPEGs can do some strange things to foliage.

I also prefer the GRiii’s Image Controls to most of the Fuji Film Simulations; particularly the the high contrast black and white and a very tasteful vivid setting (punchy but not grotesque). These considerations put the GRiii ahead, but not enough to give it sizable advantage over the X100F. Photos can easily be manipulated so this is a point stalemate for both cameras.


FUJI : 0



The GRiii, despite being smaller is still far more comfortable in my clumsy big hands. The menus, and control I do find to be easier to use in most operation. I love how customisable the camera is, and this comparison really showed me how great the touch screen is as a camera control. I, to this day, still tap on the screen of the X100F and forget the fact I can’t navigate menus and focus by touch.

The GRiii is also the most compact ‘professional’ camera I have ever used, especially with its retracting lens. I’m far from the first to state that it shoots and carries more like a smartphone than a camera, which is fantastic. Phones are far easier and stealthier than any camera you can buy and the GRiii handles like one, but with better image quality. In terms of size, Fuji kind of occupies the reverse Goldilocks zone- too big to be a compact that fits in your pocket, and too small that it lacks the perfect ergonomics of something like the X-Pro or X-T3.


FUJI : 0


While the GRiii’s handling and size is better than the X100F, it must be mentioned that over time I gained some perspective on my initial gripes with the X100F’s handling.

The most important thing being that the tactile controls of the Fuji offer the advantage of being able to set and forget. Whether the camera’s on or off the settings can be dialed in, checked and changed quickly to meet the conditions. Contrast this to the GRiii, where all controls are only visible while the back screen is activated. A fairly minor consideration to be made, but I felt it deserved mentioning.


Additionally, Fuji’s larger size gives it longer battery life, and that’s a huge plus over the GRiii. In the short time I was shooting with the GRiii, I realised very quickly the 300 shot max battery meant that I would have to carry an additional battery with the camera just in case. Not so much extra weight and size, but more fiddling around and having to remember to charge the spare. I am able to squeeze 400 shots out of the X100, which is usually more than enough for me for an afternoon of shooting.


FUJI : 1



The GRii does have in-body stabilisation, while the Fuji handles far better at Higher ISO’s  which for me makes the camera’s equivocal in terms of low light performance. I generally fix my aperture and let the program take care of the ISO and limit my shutter speed to 60th of a second. If I had the Ricoh, I would be limiting my shutter speed lower, but the fact that the camera can only produce usable images at around ISO 1600 means that I would have the same limitation.

The major drawback for the GRiii is the lack of the pop up flash, originally bundled with the GRi and GRii, which was a major selling point for me. The flash on the X100F is serviceable for fill-in flash, and is surprisingly powerful for its size. Still not as powerful as what the GRii offered, but it does the job when you need it to.


FUJI : 2



I personally, am not accustomed to the 28mm focal length of the GRiii. Plus, this focal length is almost identical to the camera I carry everywhere (my iPhone), albeit with far lesser image quality compared to the GRiii.

Irregardless, for my style of shooting this focal length is both too wide and too narrow, me being accustomed to shooting with my two favourite lenses- either a 35mm Summicron or a 18mm Zeiss Distagon

I like to alternate between low distortion of the 35mm for my travel and lifestyle shots and the hyper distorted 18mm for an enhanced perspective to shrink people into the greater landscape. I did consider the optional wide lens attachment for the Ricoh (opens it up to 21mm focal length), but this meant carrying an additional piece of equipment and an extra cost. With a fixed lens camera it’s best to go with the focal length that better suits your style, and for me this is the X100F.


FUJI : 3


So we have a tie-

BUT the X100F has a hidden ace up its sleeve in regard to focal length: if your in S focus mode, just turn the focus dial and your camera will digitally zoom to fixed 50mm and 75mm equivalent focal lengths. I love this feature, as this  can still render very usable pictures using the 24MB sensor, making the camera incredibly versatile. It’s like carrying all the major primes, without the fuss of having to both carry and change between them.

That’s easily worth a bonus point to Fuji, bringing the score to:

FUJI : 4



Admittedly, because this is a heavily bias comparison since I did indeed purchase the X100F and have spent far more time with it. I don’t have any images worth sharing from my time with the GRiii, since I mostly used it in and around the camera shop that generously trial their demo model. All of these images here were taken on the X100F.

That being said, I am certain that, had I had more time with the GR, I would have come to terms with a lot of the things I gripe about in this comparison. More than anything, my primary rationale for buying the Fuji was that I am far more accustomed to the 35mm focal length. A camera is a camera, and you can’t go wrong with either of these two kingly compacts. Both take fantastic photos, and in that being the whole aspiration of photography, they are completely equal in that most important regard.

About the Author

James Cater found his passion for photography through modeling. He is a digital and film photographer, a film lab operator, and a model. You can find more of his work on his website and follow him on Instagram. This article was also published here and shared with permission.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!


We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 responses to “The king of compacts: Ricoh GR III vs. Fuji X100F”

  1. Gary Sthland Avatar
    Gary Sthland

    Kodak instamatic

  2. Andy Murray Avatar
    Andy Murray

    Don’t know about the X100f but I use the X100T for my street photography, it’s definitely a beast for the size of it.

  3. Gabor Pal Avatar
    Gabor Pal

    you can choose 35mm and 50mm also with Ricoh… about that?

    1. Frank Avatar

      I set the left button on the back wheel of GRIII as quick fn button to choose between 28mm 35mm and 50mm. Also GR3 lens is head and shoulders above x100f lens for pixel peeping purpose, not that matters but since the author mentioned it, I’d like to point out the fact. Saying fuji’s 35mm lens great glass is an over statement.

  4. John Andrew Avatar
    John Andrew

    Too damn expensive for compact as far as I’m concerned.

  5. Ghislain Côté Avatar
    Ghislain Côté

    I owned the x100f for a year and liked it a lot. A few points to complete your excellent article:
    – The 23mm (35mm equiv.) lens is a delight AND is super sharp… But at a distance… So it is well suited for street photography, but barely acceptable for portraits. Even with the telephoto adapter attached, it was NOT on par with my DSLR nifty fifty. Under a meter, I could not get sharp eyes.
    – The flash is fantastic for the size because of the (near silent) leaf shutter then can sync flash over 1/1000s (maximum depends on aperture, for f2, it’s 1/1000s).

    It was a stellar performer, but I had to let it go… Can’t own everything as a hobbyist…

  6. Nuri S. Gdk Avatar
    Nuri S. Gdk

    Sony rx100 series and fuji x100 series.. All professionals use theese..

  7. Dušan DuPe Pethö Avatar
    Dušan DuPe Pethö


  8. Laurence Taylor Avatar
    Laurence Taylor

    You can get an XE3 and 23mm lens refurbished for £700. And you’ll get a much better small camera!