fbpx

DIY Photography

Hacking Photography - one Picture at a time

Search

 

Submit A Story

Press photographers banned from documenting the handing over of Trump’s “articles of impeachment”

by 35 Comments

The United States Senate is subjecting the press to unprecedented restrictions as Donald Trump’s impeachment trial is scheduled to begin next Tuesday. There will be no cameras allowed and no audio recorders, which will make it impossible for the press to cover the event. Expectedly, this has caused significant negative reactions among the public, especially press photographers and journalists.

 

Interestingly enough, I was just listening to the news while I was reading about this story, and these restrictions were mentioned. Reportedly, there will be no “phones or other electronic devices” allowed at the articles of impeachment delivery. No phones, no cameras, no audio recorders – just one video camera covering the historic event.

Furthermore, credentialed reporters will be forced to stay inside a single press pen, according to Business Insider. It will be set up on the second floor of the Senate, and reporters will need to pass through additional security checks.

According to Roll Call, this decision is a part of a “safety strategy” by Capitol Police Chief Steven A. Sund and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael C. Stenger. However, the Standing Committee of Correspondents wonders how banning the press from the articles of impeachment delivery will help with safety. They claim that the House and the Senate rejected every correspondents’ suggestion “without an explanation of how the restrictions contribute to safety rather than simply limit coverage of the trial.”

Naturally, reporters and press photographers strongly disagree with the decision, expressing their concerns that this move breaches the freedom of the press.

Carl Hulse of the New York Times tweeted: “Pretty much an outrage. Either Senate Republican leadership has no interest in recording history or perhaps they just want to play down the coming events altogether.”

The Washington Post’s White House reporter Seung Min Kim believes that “excessive restrictions like these only hurt the public,” and I couldn’t agree more.

Photographer David Hobby commented on the Senate’s decision with a tweet that pretty much sums up my own thoughts: “If you’re trying to erase a moment from history, job one is to ensure no still cameras are there to record it.”

[via DPReview; lead image credits: Gage Skidmore on Flickr]

Related posts:

Photographer explains how he took the viral photo of Trump’s notes POTUS Twitter account uses header photo from the wrong inauguration Photographer sues Trump Organization for copyright infringement President Trump’s new official portrait lacks pro lighting and definition

  • I figured they would just be emailed on a PDF

  • Isn’t communism glorious?

    • I think you’re confused about what communism is. It’s an economic system, not a political structure. It has nothing to do with freedom of the press.

    • Basia Kowalska Communism (from Latin communis, “common, universal”)[1][2] is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology.

    • For someone who hates communism, you’re pretty good at being publicly owned

    • Josh A Katz wtf?

  • It’s as if they don’t want photographic evidence of hm receiving it, so they can claim that he never got it. 😕

    • Daniel Strickland When organizations have repeatedly said they would do anything wether within the law or not to do the president harm don’t need to be a rocket surgeon to know how not to prop up their failing business. Or ya know that depends on what the meaning of is is

  • just like a dictator..

  • I guess they hate the media more than POTUS.

  • Next we won’t be able to look people directly in the eyes.

  • Democracy exists no more due to this POS

  • Good

  • There will be plenty of photo opportunities at his next inauguration :D

    • joshua hedden I’m keeping my camera ready to capture the exact moment of his assasisnation now that’s a keeper ehore

    • joshua hedden at an high security prison.

    • And 2nd impeachment.

  • Maybe they could use one of those courtroom sketch artists?

  • Too many wine and liquor stains

    • Jennette Thompson Tyler Peek and bodily fluids from their impeachment orgy

  • Tomas Ramirez

    Electronics have always been banned on the Senate. Nothing new there. They just didn’t get an exception. And I recall that the reporters were held to a single press pen during the Clinton impeachment. So, keeping the rules as always is now controversial?

  • Welcome to North Korea, or Iran… ohh wait it’s the new and improved USofA!

  • Nice. Fake news is disgusting.

  • Some weeks ago, the Republicans told us that it’s not correct to run the impeachment process by the Democrats “in the dark room where noone knows what they are talking about”….

    Oh yes – this is something clearly different….. 😂

    • Tomas Ramirez

      Except for the very small fact that reporters, you know, will BE IN the chamber during the impeachment.

  • Hardly a surprise.

  • Is trump taking a dump in this photo?

  • Looks like their email was down.

  • Too late its gone viral

  • I offered to recant the story using interpretative dance.

  • I guess that’s normal, would love to say he’s being petty.

  • jason bourne

    Fascism is alive and well in America, thanks to Orange Hitler.

  • Remember a reuters photographer was kicked out of the impeachment hearings for photographing documents?……..maybe he blew it for everyone.🙃

  • John Beatty

    I will not get political but what do you expect from the Fuhrer of the United States and his Gestapo.

Recent Posts