Photographer finds his iconic image edited and sold by other artist, the artist claims “remix”
Sep 18, 2018
Share:
Last week, South African photographer Graeme Williams was surprised to see one of his iconic images at Johannesburg art fair credited to someone else’s name. American artist Hank Willis Thomas took Williams’ photo, altered it, and exhibited it as his own work. And it was being sold for $36,000: 30 times more than the highest amount Williams ever got for it.
Williams took the photo in Thokoza in 1990 during a Nelson Mandela rally. It happened a few weeks after his release from prison, and the image was “heralded for capturing the sudden shift in power away from the apartheid system,” as The Guardian describes it. The photo has been published and exhibited all over the world many times, the photographer writes.
The original image is in color. Hank Willis Thomas removed the color, brightened the part of the photo, and called it his own. According to The Guardian, he defended his act “by questioning whether Williams can lay claim to ownership:
“If a photograph is 25 years old, 40, 100 years old, of public events where most people who are in the photograph are not given control over how they’re depicted and what’s happening, when is it ours as a society to wrestle with? I think of it as more akin to sampling, remixing, which is also an area that a lot of people said for a long time that rap music wasn’t music because it sampled.”
Reportedly, after Williams complained to the gallery, the work was removed. Thomas has reportedly agreed not to display it publicly because “Graeme’s feelings matter to him.” And according to Williams, the artist offered a solution. Thomas called Williams and offered his “artwork”, proposing that Williams keeps it in his home for a year. After this, they would reconnect “to discuss ‘the problem’ further.”
“Presumably it will take a year for me to fully understand the depth of his creative input and the complexity of the changes that he has made to my image. I declined the offer.”
The whole case reminds me of the time when Richard Prince used other people’s Instagram photos and sold them for $100,000. A few photographers sued him after ripping off their photos, and the federal judge refused to dismiss the case.
Many people have advised Williams to file a lawsuit against Thomas for using his work without permission and profiting from it. In my humble opinion, he should go for it. I don’t think this image is a “remix.” It’s exactly the same photo, only with some colors and brightness changed, and sold under someone else’s name for a much higher price than the original.
What do you think? Remix, or plain plagiarism?
[via The Guardian]
Dunja Đuđić
Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.


































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
6 responses to “Photographer finds his iconic image edited and sold by other artist, the artist claims “remix””
When a song gets remixed, you still have to pay the original writer. Seems reasonable the same logic should apply.
This is neither a Remix or Plagiarism, this is just purely an artist ripping off someone else’s work, then coming up with some pathetic excuse to get away with it when he has been found out. Drag the douche through a court of law, then see what his excuses are.
@DPJ says “this is just purely an artist ripping off someone else’s work, then coming up with some pathetic excuse to get away with it when he has been found out”
I think you’ll find that that is pretty much the definition of plagiarism.
Thieves will be hung.
I’m appalled. I used to hire Hank Thomas when I was Photo Editor for a mag in SF. Blatant theft.
If the court sees this as “Remix”, then people will upload music to youtubechange the tempo slightly and call it a “Remix” while earning money off it and they can easily point to this case to say the law agrees with me.