Fuji Velvia 100 labelled toxic and banned in the USA by Environmental Protection Agency
Jul 7, 2021
Share:

If you shoot film and Fujichrome Velvia 100 is your film of choice, I have some bad news for you. The film has been labeled toxic, so Fujifilm was forced to discontinue it in the US.
The chemical in question is phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1), or PIP (3:1). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has labeled it as toxic and banned or limited its production and use. Even though t tiny amount of PIP (3:1) can be found in layers of Fujichrome Velvia 100, the company had to stop producing it. But since this law is only effective in the US, I believe that the film will be available elsewhere.
Here is the full announcement from Fujifilm:
On March 8, 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule regarding the chemical phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1) (PIP (3:1)) (CASRN 68937-41-7) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which prohibited the processing and distribution in commerce, including sales, of the chemical and products containing the chemical. EPA also issued an enforcement policy on the same day stating that it will not enforce the ban on processing and distribution until September 5, 2021.
A miniscule amount (less than 0.0003%) of PIP (3:1) is present within the layers of FUJICHROME Velvia 100 Professional films. Fujifilm believes that the trace amount of PIP (3:1) in the FUJICHROME Velvia 100 Professional films pose no risk to the environment.
As a global leader in imaging, Fujifilm is committed to acting sustainably, and complying with all country regulations. As such, Fujifilm will discontinue FUJICHROME Velvia 100 Professional film in the U.S. effective immediately (July 6, 2021).
If you’ve purchased FUJICHROME Velvia 100 Professional films please read the accompanying Safety Data Sheet carefully.
Even though 0.0003% of the chemical doesn’t seem like much, I think this is a responsible (and above all legal) way to act. At the time of writing this, Fujichrome Velvia 100 has already been listed as discontinued on B&H.

Still, since other countries don’t ban PIP (3:1), at least to my knowledge, I guess this means Fuji will continue to produce and distribute the film outside of the US. Maybe they should move the factories to Serbia, we don’t even take care of air pollution and aflatoxins in milk, so what’s0.0003% of PIP (3:1) for us? Bitter jokes aside, you can still find some leftover rolls in photo stores or on Amazon and eBay, but after they’re gone… I guess you’ll have to pick a new favorite film type or order Velvia 100 from abroad.
[via Fuji Rumors]
Dunja Đuđić Kalinin
Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
11 responses to “Fuji Velvia 100 labelled toxic and banned in the USA by Environmental Protection Agency”
While Fuji was caught up with this PIP is in a lot of common products, so the impact will have more reach.
Photo film and chemistry has always been a bit toxic.Let’s hope that someone can come up with something environmentally safe.
Don´t eat this film !?
The problem is that you flush it either on your own or via a lab with some poor lab tech flushing his millionth roll of velvia. Whichever route its ending up eaten cause we’re filthy.
?
May want hold off on stockpiling. US labs won’t process the film after September. So unless you plan to use and process by then, no point buying it.
Or process it yourself :)
I don’t understand your comment about
Serbia. Do you have any facts to back it up? Why did Diyphotography allow its writers to make negative comments about other countries or its people in this article. You guys are better than that.
The writer is FROM Serbia.
No excuse. I’m sure other Serbians would have something to say about his comments
So, you’re getting offended on behalf of people you don’t know from a country in which you do not live without even really knowing what they think?
I have a question then… When you say “other” countries… “Other” countries besides where? What country is it ok to say things about?
Toxic materials are necessary for most production equipment to operate