fbpx

DIY Photography

Hacking Photography - one Picture at a time

Search

Submit A Story

CVS Pharmacy bans digital manipulations in its beauty photos

by 3 Comments

CVS Pharmacy, the retail division of CVS Health, has announced changes in its standards for beauty photos. The company is requiring transparency in all beauty photos created for stores, online promotion and all types of marketing material. By 2020, the company will implement its new standards and clearly mark all photos that haven’t been digitally altered.

 

By 2020, all photos that haven’t been “materially altered” will be marked by the “CVS Beauty Mark.” The company explains what it means by “materially altered” as “changing or enhancing a person’s shape, size, proportion, skin or eye color, wrinkles or any other individual characteristics.”

Helena Foulkes, President of CVS Pharmacy and Executive Vice President of CVS Health, says:

The connection between the propagation of unrealistic body images and negative health effects, especially in girls and young women, has been established. As a purpose-led company, we strive to do our best to assure all of the messages we are sending to our customers reflect our purpose of helping people on their path to better health.

CVS’ initiative has two main goals. One is to create a positive change when it comes to transparency in beauty images. The other goal is to “allow customers to differentiate between authentic and materially altered imagery.” The CVS Beauty Mark will start to appear on CVS Pharmacy’s products as early as in 2018. Additionally, its goal is that all images in the beauty sections of its stores reflect transparency by 2020. This means many other beauty products will need to use photos that follow CVS’ guidelines. As DPReview writes and I agree, it’s good to keep these standards in mind if you’re shooting campaigns for beauty brands.

As Foulkes has explained in her statement, unrealistic body imagery has a negative impact on girls and young women. As a woman who used to be an insecure teenager, I can strongly relate to this. I never thought I’d see a change in this direction and transparency in beauty and fashion photos. But boy, am I glad to see that this change is happening! After Getty’s new guidelines on photoshopping female bodies, CVS’ decision is another step towards positive change.

[CVS Pharmacy via DPReview]

Related posts:

Brain Scan Shows How 14 People Would Like To be Photoshopped To Perfection How Women’s Beauty Standards Have Changed Through The Eras: 3,000 Years In 180 Seconds Photo By Ian SmithCindy Crawford’s Photographer Threatens Lawsuit Over Fake Leaked Photo Of The Supermodel 2017 Pirelli calendar changes direction and shows beauty without retouching and makeup
  • Joe Hogan Fotografia

    Cosmetic companies creating anti-retouching policies to me seems slightly paradoxical. Creating false images of a product for sale is simply unethical, any product at all. However, cosmetics in themselves are retouching tools. I am increasingly becoming suspicious of this argument given that in my experience, beauty products in advertising are applied to models by professionals. The logic to me would be that if a company wants to create a vision or message of a natural product for real people, then perhaps they should use non-professional models who have applied the cosmeticas themselves.

  • I’ve long wished for a simple pie chart stamp for all commercial and advertising images that simply shows how much manipulation an image has had done to it.
    from basic raw conversion (one pie slice shaded) basic colour and exposure adjustments (two pie slices shaded) all the way to full digital composite.
    a simple stamp that at a glance tells you how real the shot is.

  • Mark Niebauer

    Oh, like CVS is such a bastion of morals. Total hipacrits!

Recent Posts