Canon 85mm f/1.2 RF vs. EF: Which one is the winner?

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

The 85mm is the favorite lens of many portrait photographers. The 85mm f/1.2 RF was introduced last year, and it has become a choice of those who switched to Canon’s EOS R mirrorless system. But can it beat the good old EF version of the 85mm f/1.2? Chris and Jordan of DPReview were eager to find out, so they made a comparison test of the two versions of this lens.

It’s worth noting that Chris and Jordan used the original Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L (not the Mark II version). Since there’s an EF to RF adapter, they tested both lenses on the same Canon EOS R body.

One thing that is a drawback of both lenses is that they’re pretty bulky and heavy. The RF version is even heavier that the EF and it’s very front-heavy, which Chris says feels pretty weird on a smaller mirrorless body.

Chris tested it out for backlit portraits and noticed that the RF doesn’t create flare, unlike the EF version which creates a lot of it. Still, it’s not necessarily bad if that’s the look you’re going for.

When it comes to the minimum focusing distance, there’s a slight difference between the two lenses. The 85mm f/1.2 RF lens allows you to get 100mm closer to the subject than the EF version. When it comes to the AF speed, the RF version has an advantage here. The AF speed is very slow in the old EF lens. The RF version is much faster, although there’s still room for improvement. Also, nailing focus with the EF lens is more difficult at wide open aperture, while Eye AF solves this problem with the RF lens. However, using the EF lens with an adapter on the Canon EOS R body gives you the same Eye AF capabilities, although it’s still a bit slower.

When it comes to chromatic aberration, you’ll see some more of it with the EF lens, while the RF variant is virtually free from it. Bokeh rendering is overall pretty neat in both lenses, and you can get a DS version of the RF lens for even smoother bokeh. But note that it will cost you some $300 more. Both lenses are considered sharp, and RF is incredibly sharp edge to edge even at f/1.2

Jordan briefly tested the lens for video, but he didn’t compare it to the EF version. Overall, the Canon 85mm f/1.2 RF is incredibly sharp and the AF is neat. However, it has some focus breathing and a few other minor drawbacks.

According to Chris, the newer RF lens is basically “near perfect.” Indeed, the image quality is truly high, as you can see from the examples. The main drawbacks are that the lens is heavy and bulky and that it’s very expensive. So, if you’re on a budget, the EF version with an adapter should still do a great job. But if you have enough cash to buy the RF version – you should go for it.

[Canon RF 85mm F1.2 Review (vs. EF Version) | DPReview]


Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 responses to “Canon 85mm f/1.2 RF vs. EF: Which one is the winner?”

  1. MegaNickels Avatar
    MegaNickels

    I wouldn’t buy either. They are both a waste of money.

    1. Kevin Avatar
      Kevin

      Curious, what would you purchase then? What’s the ideal portrait lens for you that isn’t ‘a waste of money’?

      1. MegaNickels Avatar
        MegaNickels

        These lenses do not fit my applications of photography. If you are shooting on a super high res sensor I can totally understand wanting the RF 85 f1.8 since it deffo resolves a hell of a lot more resolution than any of the older 85mm lenses but I still think it is grossly over priced. I’d rather save 2 grand and get an 85mm f1.8 with the canon lens adapter that lets you use filters behind the lens. $700 and you get the lens, adapter, and a variable ND filter vs $2699 for just the RF lens That seems like a better use of money for me. the wider aperture lenses are also quite a bit heavier. I mean if people got the cash I’m not going to try and stop them from buying it. It’s their money they can do what ever they want with it. The Canon EF 85 f1.4 and 1.2 are good lenses too but they are as sharp as the 85mm f1.8 while also keeping the fringing and being slower at focusing. The only benefit I can see of the more expensive lenses over the the cheaper one in terms of the EF 85mm lenses is the wide apertures. Other than that they produce similar results for astronomically more money. They aren’t bad lenses. They are just over priced.

        1. Kaouthia Avatar
          Kaouthia

          Which means they’re not a waste of money, objectively speaking. They’re just a waste of money FOR YOU. :)

          1. Dakota Avatar
            Dakota

            Ha ha ha ha ha you couldn’t have said it better lol. I hate when other people try to assume that everyone thinks the same way as them

  2. Sada Avatar

    The original 85 1.2 I is crap slow as a snail…. test the RF one against the II ;)