An ‘Open Letter’ to Landscape Photographers: It’s Time for an Etiquette Check
Aug 22, 2015
Michael Mariant
Share:
YOUR SHOTS ARE NOT THAT UNIQUE, SO THERE’S NO REASON TO RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE.
Have you ever noticed that when you go to a Costco gas station, the rows of vehicles can be so orderly with everyone nicely lined up with a general polite and cordial demeanor. But once those friendly drivers park their fueled cars in the lot and trek inside the Costco store, all matters of civility, politeness and order disappears the moment you approach one of the food sample stands. Shoppers jockey their carts for position to seize that small pizza sample, blocking the little ones from taking cups of trail mix, and snatching that last mini-cup of yogurt like it’s the last one cup of yogurt for all of mankind.
What has become of our society, with an attitude that something there for the taking, can’t be taken by others? A mindset that it is only his or hers for the taking, and to be damned sure no one else can get one before them, or after. Where has the common decency gone?
And I’m not talking about just the Costco shoppers. They are a perfect analogy for today’s landscape photographers.
I will put this out there right now: I am generalizing about the mindset of landscape photographers overall. For every rude and inconsiderate photographer standing at Yosemite’s famed Tunnel View, there are 2-3 photographers that are courteous. But as your mother told you, all it takes is for one person to ruin it for everyone else.
So for those photographers who block others’ shots with their setup, who hold court at a location for hours on end to keep others from their precious 3-foot square tripod property, who trek through a scene and mar it for those that follow, and who give complete disregard to the soil, sand, foliage or scene to ensure that they have an ‘original’ photo …
It’s time for a reality check. It’s time for an etiquette check.
FACE IT: YOUR PHOTO IS NOT BETTER. IT’S NOT ORIGINAL.
I hate to break it to you. Your photo that you strived so hard to get, seeing where everyone else was set-up and where you could get closer, albeit in their angle of view; breaking branches as you bushwhacked your way up the mountain; trying to copy that one photo you saw one time on Flickr, a post-processed, over-saturated photo that got tons of ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’; ignoring the cries and pleas from other photographers that you were in their shot or ruining their shot …
Well, that didn’t make your picture unique or better. It just was different than everyone else. And different certainly doesn’t mean good.
And that ‘different’ was at the sacrifice of all the other photographers you screwed over.
We see it all the time during our Death Valley workshop course, when a photographer will trek up a distant sand dune that the students are shooting. Even as everyone hollers out to stop, yelling for the photographer to walk on the shadow side as to leave no visible footprints (Tip #1), and the response yelled back is, “I don’t care. I’m getting the shot you aren’t getting!” Or, even worse, “I was here first. Live with it.”

Look at the two photos above … yeah, the footsteps can ruin a perfectly pristine dune face. But in the top photo, the dunes were tracked over by our workshop photo students, but on the backside … the shadow side that doesn’t face the camera.
It doesn’t take a lot of common sense to see that your shoes leave footprints. But when some of these photographers have a goal in sight, either it’s ignorance, carelessness, or intentional that they leave footprints behind.
So share this near and far to all photographers who trek out to sand dunes: Always walk on the shadow side of the dunes. Respect the other photographers who are out there!
HEED THE OLD PHOTO ADAGE: LOOK BEHIND YOU
One of the greatest little sayings in photography has a simple premise: once you are set up with your shot, don’t forget to check the scene behind you. Something amazing might be happening that you have your back facing. Or it could be a large group of angry photographers.
Several years ago at Zabriski Point in Death Valley, where photographers flock to the vista point for first light on Manly Beacon at sunrise, about 40 photographers were lined up on the paved viewpoint, while one photographer hiked down to a rise below the vista point — but clearly in everyone’s angle of view — and proceeded to ignore the yells and requests to clear out of the shot. The photographer, wearing a bright orange and black jacket, never once even turned to acknowledge or acquiesce the requests. The sun rose and everyone was planning the post-production cloning to remove the photographer.
And what about her shot? It wasn’t that different. From the lower vantage point, if anything, it put the horizon right through the middle of Manly Beacon. Her shot wasn’t better than everyone else’s. It was just different.
To that photographer: you weren’t the better or smarter photographer. Your photo didn’t beat out everyone else.
It made you the scorn (and disgust) of the landscape photographers that do try to capture something in a respectful way.
(And how do we know the photographer in orange and black was a ‘she’? Because an hour later at breakfast, where all the photographers mass together for post-shooting grub, in walked the photographer in orange and black. Her reception was uncomfortable, but cordial. )
TAKE PHOTOS. DON’T LEAVE ANYTHING BEHIND. EVEN FOOTPRINTS.
“Has “tread lightly” become a phrase that is as common as “recyclable cups”, easy to recite but which takes effort to actually apply?”
We discussed the incident above extensively in a previous post, where an unknown photographer trekked out through the mud at the Sliding Rocks at the Racetrack in Death Valley. The playa there is so delicate, that an mark just ½” deep on it’s surface is visible for years.
This damage would have been something that lasted for generations, but the National Park Service stepped in do perform some “reconstructive surgery” on the damaged playa.
As we said then, we preach in our workshop courses that we should never leave any sign of our presence at a location. That includes not just trash but also footprints, tripod holes or broken branches.
We want to arrive at a scene and see it in its natural state, photographically pristine for our creative vision, and not in a state that looks like Bigfoot was there with his 4×5 camera.
DOCTORING THE SCENE? REALLY? YOU HAVE TO STOOP THAT LOW?
It’s one thing to place a colorful leaf on a streamside rock, creating that anchor in what will probably be a nice photograph of flowing water. (I knew a photographer that kept a collection of leaves just for that purpose!) This doesn’t alter the scene, or make it irreproducible for later photographers.
But let’s head back to Death Valley and the Sliding Rocks at the Racetrack. It has utterly saddened me that people are taking the Sliding Rocks from the Racetrack these days. YES, they are taking the rocks off the playa, leaving track without a rock there. Decades of nature at work, gone as a souvenir.
(Tip #2: The rocks aren’t special. It’s the location. If you bring them home, I guarantee you they won’t slide across your kitchen floor.)
I would attribute this rock theft to tourists who want that special (albeit illegal) souvenir to take home. That is until I spoke with a photographer friend who shared a story that took the lack of photography ethics to a whole new level of dastardly low.
My friend shared that when he was at the Racetrack several months ago, he witnessed a photographer picking up one of the sliding rocks and moving it to a different track. He then proceeded to carry the rock off the playa and discard it.
When he was questioned, his response was “Now nobody will get that shot ever again. It’s one-of-a-kind.”
Think about that statement for a second and the rationale behind it … This is the new level of low photographer ethics that we are seeing propagate at photography locations lately.
What narcissistic, self-absorbed, holier-than-thou, pompous and arrogant level of conceit leads you to believe that you are better than the rest and therefore worthy of a location that only YOU should have the God-given right to photograph, rooted with such a complete disregard to nature, dictated by a guttural fear inside you that someone else might actually take that same, cheap, boring, and stereotypical iPhone-level snapshot lacking any creativity that you so callously created?
Give me a second to climb down off this soapbox …
YOU ARE NOT THE PROTECTOR OF THE REALM
It’s about 30 minutes after sunrise in the Alabama Hills, during our Eastern Sierra & Owens Valley workshop course. At the Mobius Arch, a beautiful natural arch that frames Mt. Whitney in the distance, photographers trek up throughout the morning to capture an iconic shot.
Making camp there, in your collapsible chair with your camera bags surrounding you like a harem, keeping other itinerant photographers at bay, lined up but denied their opportunity as you hold court and wait for that perfect, exact millisecond of shutter click. It does not exactly paint a picture of you on a pedestal, “smart enough to get here before everyone else to get the shot,” as you say.
No, you are not the better photographer because you got there early. No, you’re a jerk. You could easily yield your position for 30 seconds to let another photographer in to get the photograph they see right then and there.
There is no public location that Mother Nature created that is exclusive access to a photographer that “got there first” or “waits for the perfect moment” and no other photographer can’t enjoy.
Don’t let your fear of someone else getting “your” shot dictate your actions of keeping it from others. Everyone sees a scene differently, even at a place that is so photographed over like Mobius Arch. Or Tunnel View in Yosemite Valley. I just can’t see Ansel Adams using his 4×5 camera to block others from getting a shot.
IT’S TIME TO STEP UP. WE’RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER
Just because you have a self-inflicted belief that you have a right to do something, that doesn’t mean morally or ethically it’s the right thing to do. Quit screwing over your fellow photographers!
It’s time for all of us to step up. We need to watch where we are going and make sure that nobody can tell where we’ve been. We need to listen to the requests of other photographers when we are entering a scene that they are shooting. Share your spot with others. Play nice. Be aware of wonder
Maybe we all need a refresher that goes back to kindergarten, where we all learned to play fair. Remember the rules of kindergarten? Go ahead. Click the photo at left and read it. It applies to everything we are talking about here.
Seriously. Read it. It will not only put a smile on your face, brighten your day, but also make more sense than anything else you’re read in this letter.
In the name of landscape photographers everywhere, let’s be the photographers we wish the others to be that precede us. Let’s bring back the common decency.
About the author
Michael Mariant is the Director of Workshop Operations at High Sierra Workshops, which offers world-class academic photography workshop courses for those interested in shooting in the great outdoors. You can find out more about High Sierra Workshops on their website. This article was also published here.

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.





































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
20 responses to “An ‘Open Letter’ to Landscape Photographers: It’s Time for an Etiquette Check”
It’s one of the most amazing self-righteous rants I’ve had the misfortune to read.
After I read “What has become of our society” I think I should have just stopped reading.
That’s because both of you are asshats/like the article talks about.
Common courtesy and decency are very self-righteous concepts indeed.
OMG, yes. Try living in Utah (one of the most scenic & photo’d landscape areas). You should SEE the rudeness at Mesa Arch!
This.
When I was at mesa arch at sunrise, I had my gopro nestled into a bush where no one behind it could see to take a time lapse. However, when I wasn’t looking, a photographer went to lay down in that exact spot that this was set. He picked up the gopro, and TOSSED it behind him so he could lay down there. WHAT THE F**K. I confronted him and he said, “I have better gear than you will ever have. Heck, I spent $3000 on this tripod. This is justified because I will get the better shot here.” At this point, I was ready to snap one of his $1000 tripod legs, but I held back because I didn’t want to be worse than him. Anyway, here is a photo of what it looked like when I got there. The gopro was set behind that one bush that you see on the right in the background, after this photo was taken. To clarify, not the big one in the foreground, but the one in the way back. The guy that knocked it over and tossed it was the guy in the lime green vest in the back. Honestly, I think he did it just to be confronted because the shot there ended up sucking.
TL:DR; a guy tossed my gopro out of the way because he was more important and wanted to fuck with someone.
I don’t think I would have been nearly as gracious as you were Oliver! This article is bang on the money and it’s pretty amazing (and a complete mystery to me) the negative reaction it has generated. As someone who has done some pretty extreme things to be the first one in the right place at the right time at a famous location – yes I do feel I have the right to get my shot first – but I am horribly self conscious about denying others the same opportunity. And honestly, how long does it really take to copy an iconic shot – maybe 5 frames – tops?
This is right on. I got there super early to get a good shot, but was pushed out of the way before sunrise so a “class for landscape photography” could take 10 minutes to get their shots. I was nice about it to that one guy, but being there first and being pushed out of the way by some other guys made me angry. At this point, I pushed through them and set my camera up right in the middle of them to get the classic sun-star shot right at sunrise. They didn’t say anything because they knew that they did the same thing. I am usually kind of drawn back from getting in front of anyone, but this was one time where I couldn’t be.
If someone had grabbed my equipment and thrown it out of the way, I might have beat with his $3000 tripod. That goes beyond rudeness.
As a photographer , I can positively say that a lot of this article is total rubbish both the writer and the site should be ashamed of that part it. Every image is unique , if not buy a postcard, Waiting for light is not a pastime it’s an important part of an image, light is the most important part of an image, walking on the shadow side seems logical, except the sun has a nasty habit of moving doesn’t it, As to groups going out to learn, great shots aren’t or shouldn’t be the object, that should be to learn technique, a great shot might be a by product with luck, although all participants will have an image that the teacher has directed, by choosing the location the angle and the time of day. Respect is important of course but just maybe the person on the hill was going to shoot into the shadow side, Thinking about his point of view is important now that’s respect.
Phillip McCordall
Those things are true, they are important to photography. The article isn’t saying light is unimportant. The article isn’t telling you not to go where you need for the shot.
A simpler headline would be “Dont Be a Jerk.”
If you are all alone and there are no other photographers around, and you aren’t blocking other people’s shots, not casting a shadow on other people’s photos, not interrupting or damaging anything, then take your time and set up your shot. If there are other photographers and you’re all taking shots without disturbing each other staying out of each other’s way and leaving the area clean behind you, that is wonderful.
But if you are blocking others from accessing the site, or setting up your equipment where all the passing visitors want to get their shots, or tearing up a site so others cannot enjoy it, that’s a probem. Don’t be a jerk.
Your probably the guy who moved the rock…or just like him.
Wow. I see the arrogant trolls have flocked here where everyone with a soul can see them for what they are. Excellent strategy Tiffany.
So is this article by Tiffany Mueller or a copy/paste of Michael Mariant’s words?
As a photographer that enjoys taking landscapes, I have to say this rant on “no original shots” and so written in such an extreme and hyperbolic that it would be more at home on Buzzfeed. While there are some valid points and examples of extreme inconsideration, it is more or less a rant based on a couple of extreme incidents that is leveled at the rather large mass of landscape photographers.
Isn’t that all they do?
i think the idea is your photo wont be super special and unique, as they very popular sites
Don’t go where the crowd is. There are unique landscapes all around you. You don’t have to go to these “iconic” places to do great photography. Part of the reason these places are overcrowded in the first place is because of the so-called photo-tourism that the author seems to be a part of.
I mainly agree, with the nuance that while the view in and of itself might be worth a long drive, and the urge to gather in a mooing herd to compare gear and add to the Flickrverse may be irresistable, assume from the outset that choosing to join the crowd means Photoshop is your friend.
And yet, photographers like to play victim any chance they get if someone dares question them.
Shared it with other in Photography Digest #2. Thanks for the article, was a good read.