The milky way, a medium format camera and a f/4 lens – this is how it went

Ole Henrik Skjelstad

Ole Henrik Skjelstad is a Norwegian math teacher and landscape photographer. He fell in love with photography in 2013 when he got a camera as a birthday present.

Låtefossen, Norway. The milky way is from the Maldives. Ground: Pentax 645Z. Sky: Pentax K-1.

For several years I have believed that shooting with a medium format camera at high iso would yield a terrible result. I have thought that there is likely no point in even trying because the image will be ruined because of noise. However, this fall I brought my Pentax 645Z and the Pentax 25mm f4 out into the darkness where the zombies reign.

I would have loved to have an ultra-wide-angle f2.8 lens to the 645Z. That would have been an advantage. On the other hand, many claims that a larger sensor with larger pixels will capture more light, so perhaps a f/4 lens could work after all.

How did it go?

How did the 645Z fare? And did I survive the relentless attacks from the zombies? Let’s find out.

The following image is shot at iso 6,400, and it is straight out of camera.

25 secs f/4, iso 6,400

This is how the image looks after it is edited in Lightroom:

When I tried to open up the shadows further, the foreground turned magenta. I was a tad disappointed when I saw this color shift in the deepest shadows. It isn’t difficult to correct (for instance, paint over with the opposite color), but it is always more convenient to have it straight “out of camera”.

I have seen deep shadows turn magenta with the Canon 6D (which is considered a very decent high iso camera), and even the Pentax K-1 when pushed hard at high iso. For some reason, I thought that a medium format camera would behave differently.

Color shift in the shadows

Blending exposures

I had my darkness paranoia reasonably under control this evening so it became possible to shoot a 125 sec exposure for the shadows. Otherwise, the same settings as the sky exposure.

Straight out of camera:

125 secs

Adjusted in Lightroom with plenty of shadow detail:

This is how the image looks after the sky and shadow exposures are blended and edited in Photoshop:

Iso 12,800

I also wanted to test out what would happen if I shot iso 12,800. Well, this happened:

iso 12800 25 secs f/4

When I began to push the file in Lightroom I got some weird color shifts in the foreground. It is likely that my headlamp is responsible for this. I didn’t turn it off while the exposure ran due to some very fierce zombie attacks around that time. Even with my back to the camera, some light has leaked into the foreground.

In order to fix the foreground, I opted to create a virtual copy of the image in Lightroom, which I next desaturated. After I blended the two images (the original file and the virtual copy) in Photoshop, I added a slight blue tint to the foreground. Below is the finished image. I had no idea when I started out editing that such a result would be possible at iso 12,800. I have of course added some noise reduction, but considering the high iso the file was surprisingly “clean” from the outset.

Ringerike, Norway

Conclusion

Shooting at high iso with a medium format camera provided surprisingly good results. I was actually “forced” to use a narrower aperture than what I usually prefer and got rounder stars, more detail and a wider depth of field.

End note: I barely survived the zombie attacks, but I have hired bodyguards for the next time I head out to shoot the night sky. The pay is extremely low, but it is an exciting, meaningful (for me) and suspenseful job.

Please note that by adding a Dark Reader extension to your browser it is possible to view the images on a dark background.


Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Ole Henrik Skjelstad

Ole Henrik Skjelstad

Ole Henrik Skjelstad is a Norwegian math teacher and landscape photographer. He fell in love with photography in 2013 when he got a camera as a birthday present.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 responses to “The milky way, a medium format camera and a f/4 lens – this is how it went”

  1. MGRo Avatar
    MGRo

    Crikey those are gorgeous pics! Thank you for sharing your process AND the results. What’s your next challenge to tackle?

    1. Ole Henrik Skjelstad Avatar
      Ole Henrik Skjelstad

      Thanks a lot!

  2. Suyash Rai Avatar

    Great work man. Plus a huge difference between former and latter.

    1. Ole Henrik Skjelstad Avatar
      Ole Henrik Skjelstad

      A huge thanks!

  3. Jonathan F.V. Avatar

    Great looking photos, especially the first one! I’m not surprised that your Pentax 645Z did a good job. It has a CMOS sensor and not a CCD. Medium format cameras didn’t have good high ISO performance because they had CCD sensors.

    1. Ole Henrik Skjelstad Avatar
      Ole Henrik Skjelstad

      Thanks so very much! Indeed, the CMOS sensor did super well. I have a friend who is a very gifted landscape photographer. His claim is that the 645Z sensor (Hasselblad uses it also) is the best sensor Sony has ever made.

      1. Jonathan F.V. Avatar

        I’m not sure if that sensor has BSI technology, but oh boy does Sony pumps out good sensors!

  4. Paddy F Dong Avatar
    Paddy F Dong

    Sweet photos, Odin bless you and your dark skies….. And well done for multi tasking, taking those amazing pics And fighting off Zombies…. Well done that man.

    1. Ole Henrik Skjelstad Avatar
      Ole Henrik Skjelstad

      Thanks a lot! And thanks again! It will be much easier from now on with the hired bodyguards.

  5. Cristi Neagu Avatar
    Cristi Neagu

    Why would you think a medium format camera has bad noise performance? The bigger the sensor, the more light it gets, the better the performance.
    Also, you might want to look into specialized software for processing these images, such as Deep Sky Stacker or Astra Image

    1. Ole Henrik Skjelstad Avatar
      Ole Henrik Skjelstad

      Not sure why that idea had been able to build a nest in my head.
      Yes, I know about those, but haven’t had the energy or time to sit down to use and learn those pieces of software.

      1. Cristi Neagu Avatar
        Cristi Neagu

        I made a mistake. Didn’t mean Deep Sky Stacker, I meant Sequator.

  6. roger larson Avatar
    roger larson

    In your first unaltered picture, the constellations Delphinus, Sagitta, and Aquila are plainly visible. I have taken a similar picture with a Nikon D3200 entry level DSLR. Basically this is what our eyes can see.
    You took another unaltered picture with a longer exposure in it you can see the stars are not round but are line segments. Done that too.
    By using photoshop you created pictures that are very interesting but our eyes don’t see the sky like that.

    1. Peter Blaise Avatar

      No “but”.

      It’s photography, not eyes.
      .