DIY Photography

Your one stop shop for everything photo-video

  • News
  • Inspiration
  • Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • DIY
  • Gear
Search

Submit A Story

Pros and cons of teleconverters for macro photography

Dec 18, 2020 by Maximilian Simson Add Comment

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

What are teleconverters and how do they work?

Tele-converters are handy lens add-ons that multiply the focal length of the lens they are attached to. They can be mounted in between the camera body and lens (typically a telephoto lens) and increase the focal length of the lens which they are attached to.

By how much is dependent on their power, which is stated as a factor. E.g. a 1.4x teleconverter multiplies the original focal length of a lens by 1.4. As a result a 100mm lens would turn into a 140mm lens, a 200mm lens would turn into a 280mm lens, and so on. Most common are 1.4x or 2x converters, but occasionally converters as strong as 3x can be found as well.

Why am I telling you this in a macro blog? Well, the beauty of these converters is that their power not only applies to the focal length of regular lenses, but to the magnification ratio of macro lenses just as well!

Teleconverters can be incredibly useful tools for high-level magnification, such as snowflakes for example…

Tele-converters for Macro Photography

Mounting a 1 macro lens to a 1,4x teleconverter will increase its magnification to 1,4x.

Unfortunately, the same factor will apply to the (effective) aperture that is being used, in terms of light loss and in terms of diffraction softening as well. A 1.4x converter will lose you one stop of light, a 2x converter reduces it by two.

The reason for this effect is, that such converters simply enlarge the aerial image that an existing lens is projecting, and because we are only using the center portion of this enlarged projection only a portion of the light, that enters the lens, reaches the sensor; hence the light loss. The slides beneath illustrate this effect:

On the flipside, this means there are good news, too; since the converter merely enlarges an existing image, there is no effect on its Depth of field, nor on the working distance, which can be incredibly useful out in the field or with reflective subjects…

Teleconverters Vs. Extension Tubes

But teleconverters are not the only way to enable macro magnification on a given lens, so why would one choose a n expensive piece of extra glass over hallow tubes that can be purchased for a fraction of the price a good converter costs?

Of course extension tubes are much more common among macro photographers, more affordable and therefore usually the first choice. But extension tubes will only get you so far, and every tube added is less effective than the previously one. Especially when we are using all our resources to get as close to the subject as possible, they make for an incredibly useful tool, that allows us to multiply the magnification ratio by a relatively large factor.

E.g. when we’re photographing something as tiny as a snowflake for example, or when we need a large magnification ratio and a reasonable working distance at the same time. To increase the magnification ratio even further we can combine a teleconverter with extension tubes as well. When doing so it is important to mount the converter first in line and the tubes to the converter – this will maintain a noticeably better image quality.

However, due to the fact that we add additional optics to an existing lens, teleconverters will decrease the image quality further than extension tubes would. The extra glass elements are additional obstacles in the path of light and no matter how well they are engineered, they will decrease quality to some degree.

However, both, teleconverters as well as extension tubes, will exaggerate chromatic aberration and limitations in sharpness, as we expand the image circle.

For this set-up I needed a large working distanceto maintain proper alignment without catching a reflection of the lens in my footage.

Because of the inherent loss of image quality, mounting multiple converters in sequence is not really recommendable. Of course this is dependent on a variety of factors such as the specific converters in use, their individual quality, and how well they work together but more often than not a sequence of multiple converters will ruin your images, either by simply decreasing their quality or due to diffraction.

An exception to this “rule” can be found in the images beneath, for where I combined two 2X converters to achive a magnification ratio of 16X. To get away with this I had to shoot my lens wide open at f/3.5 and accept slight diffraction softening.

Just in case you haven’t guessed it, this is the eye of a bumblebee…

Time to sum it up!

  • Benefits:
    • Can be combined with tubes for even more magnification.
      (Always mount the extender first in line, closest to the camera.)
    • Increased working distance compared to a lens of equal magnification and focal length without a teleconverter. (The working distance will not change by adding a converter)
    • No loss of DOF. (generally the depth of field at a shrinks as we increase the magnification ratio; not so with teleconvertes.)
    • They are versatile, small and easy to carry. Work with a wide variety of lenses. (Including all Macro lenses, except for few specialty lenses.)
    • and even if you don’t own a macro lens, a 2X converter might just be enough to catapult you into the range of 1:1 lifesize magnification. Many zoom lenses have a close-up function, that will sometimes bring you up to 1:2 lifesize. Take that times 2 and you’ve got yourself a macro lens.
  • Downsides:
    • Reduced image quality (degree varies, acceptable results are well possible)
    • Expensive (depending on the model and source. Good deals on 3rd party converters can be found on platforms like eBay. I have had good experiences with most renowned brands, like Tamron, Soligor, Kenko and Yongnuo.)
    • Light loss (1 stop 1.4x-converters or 2 stops at 2x-converters)

… and that’s pretty much it.

Just in case you’re interested, I’ll link my YouTube Video on this topic below.

For more future videos and macro tutorials, please subscribe to my channel, it’s a quick and easy way to support my content and let me know that you enjoy posts like this.

About the Author

Maximilian Simson is a macro photographer based in London, Ontario. You can find more of his work and creative ideas on his website and YouTube channel, and follow him on Instagram and Facebook. This article was also published here and shared with permission.

FIND THIS INTERESTING? SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS!

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Flipboard
  • WhatsApp

Related posts:

Pros and cons of teleconverters: should you really buy them? Pros and cons of using LED lights for portrait photography The pros and cons of adding LED lighting to your photography kit The pros and cons of shooting both film and digital for street photography

Filed Under: Gear Tagged With: extension tubes, macro photography, Maximilian Simson, teleconverter, teleconverters

Guest Author: from diyphotography.net

About Guest Author

This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

« I built a fully manual Polaroid studio camera
Happy 30th birthday, Hubble: NASA adds 30 breathtaking new photos to its Hubble collection »

Submit A Story

Get our FREE Lighting Book

DIYP lighting book cover

* download requires newsletter signup
DIYPhotography

Recent Comments

Free Resources

Advanced lighting book

Recent Posts

  • Here’s a bullet time video booth you can build yourself
  • Ricoh has discontinued the HD PENTAX-DA 21mm F3.2AL Limited silver lens
  • This “stellar flower” unravels the twilight’s evolution in 360 degrees
  • Strobes vs Continuous LEDs – Which is right for you?
  • Wave goodbye to Apple’s My Photo Stream next month

Udi Tirosh: from diyphotography.netUdi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Alex Baker: from diyphotography.netAlex Baker is a portrait and lifestyle driven photographer based in Valencia, Spain. She works on a range of projects from commercial to fine art and has had work featured in publications such as The Daily Mail, Conde Nast Traveller and El Mundo, and has exhibited work across Europe

David Williams: from diyphotography.netDave Williams is an accomplished travel photographer, writer, and best-selling author from the UK. He is also a photography educator and published Aurora expert. Dave has traveled extensively in recent years, capturing stunning images from around the world in a modified van. His work has been featured in various publications and he has worked with notable brands such as Skoda, EE, Boeing, Huawei, Microsoft, BMW, Conde Nast, Electronic Arts, Discovery, BBC, The Guardian, ESPN, NBC, and many others.

John Aldred: from diyphotography.netJohn Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter - and occasional beta tester - of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Dunja Djudjic: from diyphotography.netDunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Copyright © DIYPhotography 2006 - 2023 | About | Contact | Advertise | Write for DIYP | Full Disclosure | Privacy Policy