$20 work light vs. $900 studio lighting: how does it stack up for food photography?
May 18, 2018
Share:
We all know how expensive photo gear is. Luckily, if you’re just starting out or you’re a poor photographer, there are plenty of DIY and cheap options you can choose. Food photographer Skyler Burt of We Eat Together suggests a simple lighting setup that will cost you under $30. To show you just how well it works, he compares it to his professional $900 light.
To create his simple DIY lighting setup for food photography, Skyler uses a cheap work light and some parchment paper. You’ll also need:
- A-clamps
- a stapler
- an extension arm (or just improvise: use a curtain rod, clothes rack or a PVC pipe)
- two pieces of black foam core (optional)
The setup
To create this lighting setup, Skyler simply stapled the pieces of parchment paper together to create a diffusing material large enough for his table. Then he used the A-clamps to attach the paper to the extension arm. You can also use a bed sheet or a shower curtain, as long as it’s white and diffuses the light.
Next, Skyler styled the food he wanted to photograph, positioned the light, and placed the parchment paper in front of it to add diffusion. When you create a setup like this, Skyler points out that it’s important to turn off all the other lights in the room: Otherwise, your photo might look flat or you’ll have different color temperatures in the scene. Also, you can use black foam core to block the light that bounces off the ceiling and walls. Just put it opposite of the main light and above the scene.
There are two things to keep in mind about the work lights. First, they get hot quickly, so don’t touch the metal parts. And second, they’re not daylight balanced, so make sure that your white balance settings are correct.
Comparison to professional lighting
When Skyler set up the work light and the parchment paper, he took a photo with FujiFilm x-e2 and an 18-55mm kit lens. Since many beginners take photos with a kit lens, he wanted to make the setup suitable for them. He also took one with iPhone 6s, considering that many people start with smartphone photography.
Then, he recreated the entire setup, but he used the gear he normally shoots with. He photographed the same scene with a Canon 5Ds, a 50mm f/1.2 lens, Elinchrom Pro HD 500w Monolight and a diffusor.
Here are the results:
Although you can see some difference in quality, you can’t tell that the iPhone photo and the light in it are bad. For a lighting setup that costs under $30, I think that the results are pretty impressive. Of course, as Skyler puts it, it wouldn’t convince him to go and sell his high-end photography gear. However, for those of you who are just starting out or have a small budget, I think this can be a great lighting solution to get you started.
If you’d like to see more photos, make sure to check out Skyler’s blog.
[$20 Work Light VS $900 Studio Strobe Food Photography Lighting On A BUDGET! | We Eat Together]
Dunja Đuđić
Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.





































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
10 responses to “$20 work light vs. $900 studio lighting: how does it stack up for food photography?”
You’re saying that is the level of detail and clarity drawn from the 5Ds and lens?
I feel like you have to intentionally not use the camera to its potential in order to make these comparisons.
tbf, most of these pictures land on insta or any other social network that already compress the image to death, also 90% of the audience don’t give a crap anyway about details.
Don’t get me wrong, both tools have their ups and downs, in these cases though, an iPhone is more than enough.
There are ways to avoid compression on socials and the audience cares about detail, they just don’t know it until they see what better is. We’re not simply talking about good enough to do the job, we’re talking about whether or not one image lands on a menu and the other one ends up in the trash.
Jessica C. Tam
I’m sold. I’m gonna sell my multi thousand dollar medium format kit with Profoto lighting for an iPhone and a 30$ light thingy, then I can die happy!
??
For someone starting out building a portfolio/landing a first job – Brilliant.
But there is a clear difference between the 2 images, the second image is clealry going to increase the restaurants apeal to potntial customers.
Also why did he have to shoot on the Iphone?
If it’s a photographer building a portfolio, then most likely they’ll use something other than an iPhone to take the shot. The 2nd image looks better not because of lighting, but because of the quality of the camera and lens. Most likely shot in raw, properly post-processed, etc.
I LOVE this idea! I’m a beginner food photographer and this will work great for me. Would an LED work light produce the same effect?