Finally - Aperture and Shaped Bokeh Relations Revealed

HOW TO (by steven -l-l-l- monteau)Photographer Steven Monteau, the guy behind the Battlefield Pinhole camera, decided to take a stab at the Shaped Bokeh thing.

As everything with Steven, it is a combination of Art, science and Magic. Steven explored the effect of using different apertures on the final shaped bokeh effect, and did this in quite a unique way.

Using a 50mm 1.4 Lens, Steven took 16 different test shots. Each shot with a different aperture and a different bokeh shaping filter. Now here comes the smart part, the shape of the filter is the F stop used in the shot. Gotta admit that this is a pretty clever tagging system. (And actually way better than tagging the apertures with recycle symbols or bear paws).

Before we jump into the actual test, If you wanna take a stub on the bokeh thing, you can read the tutorial here,
or get a readymade kit here.

Below are the 16 test shots, for each of the aperture values. As expected, the depth of field grows as aperture becomes smaller. Also not surprising is to see that the bokeh shape is getting smaller (which matches the circle of confusion getting smaller as well). And there is a movie after the test images...

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

To get the idea of increasing circles of diffusion, here are two shots, with no filter at f/1.4 and f/8

Shaped Aperture Test

Shaped Aperture Test

The time lapse movie below is the outcome of that exploration. See if you can guess the aperture of each segment of the film.

Steven's Flickr stream is filled with explorations, studies and general goodies, if you like this blog, there is a good chance you'll like the stream

Get the DIYP greatness via RSS, newsletter and Twitter
Connect with the community: Facebook Page, Discussions
Share Ideas, Setups, Images and Projects on DIYP's Flickr, visit Readers Photos

Comments

It is a bit confusing that

  • May 27, 2010
  • Anonymous

It is a bit confusing that not only the circle of confusion but also the numbers on the bokehs are getting smaller... So for an educational tool, you should keep the patterns on the bokeh at the same size.

Awesome stuff, anyway!

  Ah, I love this! I'm now

 

Ah, I love this!

I'm now dying to experiment with this myself! I love the video especially, all those numbers floating around are quite surreal. Very nice.

typo i hope?

  • May 27, 2010
  • Brynjar Andresen

On the pictures without filter it says " f/1.4 and f/1.8"
I hope that is suppose to say " f/1.4 and f/8" !?
Or else I seriously have to reconsider getting the 50mm f/1.4 insted of the 50 mm f/1.8 ;)

re: f/1.8

  • May 27, 2010
  • udijw

oh, that's what happens when the tagging is gone. thanks for helping on the fix.

haha

- " Or else I seriously have to reconsider getting the 50mm f/1.4 insted of the 50 mm f/1.8 ;) "

hahaha i do understand you

How is the area calculated?

Is the aperture area calculated for the shaped cutout; as that would be that actual aperture and would be less than that which is set on the camera and would affect exposure and DOF accordingly.

I am sure there is some sort of color analysis that software that could tell you what percentge was black or white in the cutout pattern image. These percentages would need to match the fractional f-stop value for the lens in question.

 

freestyle !

yeah, calculating the percentage of black or white is a really good idea 

however, it's all freestyle here !

I do, whit shape of 24 hours

  • May 27, 2010
  • leonardo vidal

Wild and crazy but...

I'm just going to stick to letting my exif data keep track of my aperture settings, though I love shaped bokeh.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. It is not case sensitive
8 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.