Creating That Dave Hill Look

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_s.jpgNick Wheeler, one of my all times Flickr favorites, just uploaded a new picture to DIYP pool. (And yes, it is the same Nick who brought you The DIY Strip Light and the Floor Lit Table Top Studio).

The posing on this picture is great, but the first eye catcher of this image is the Dave Hill post processing look it has.

If you don't know Dave Hill, please, sit back and treat yourself to an hour of fine photography. Dave is known for two things: You can not forget his portraits ones you've seen them - the visual impact is very strong. And you can not ignore his unique post processing look, what has become to be known as "The Dave Hill Look".

It looks like the web is all over Dave this month, as both the Stobist mail-tiviewed him and Scott Kelby gave a great tip on how to create a Dave Hill look in Lightroom.

I wanted to play a little and gave the Dave Hill look a try with a technique found in the Strobist threads. Thanks Omar for putting the thread together. (Click any of the images for bigger view)

This is what I started with - an image of my love one and her double-second-cousin.

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_00.jpg

The first thing is to duplicate the image layer (CTRL + J) and run a High Pass filter on the duplicated layer. Then choose 4.0 as filter radius. WOW! Don't be alarmed, we will fix this in a sec...

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_02.jpg

The next step is to select "vivid light" as the layer blending mode. Now flatten the layers (CTRL + SHIFT + E).

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_03.jpg

Again, duplicate the layer, and do a High Pass filter on the dup. This time select 6.9 as radius and color as blending mode.

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_04.jpg

Now choose layer opacity 40% and flattened again.

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_05.jpg

Now again - duplicate the layer. Now call on the Gaussian Blur (Filter-> Blur-> Gaussian Blur) filter and set it to 9.5. Still using the dup layer, call on the noise filter (Filter -> Noise -> Add Noise) and apply 3% noise.

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_07.jpg

OK, that looks really blurry, we will do something about it. Like remove all the blur from the eyes and ....

Now add a layer mask (Layer -> Add Layer Mask -> Hide All), and select the eyes using the lasso tool (L is the short cut for this). Now invert the selection (Shift + Control + I).

Now take the brush tool (B) set the opacity to 30% and paint over the entire image. TADA! Eyes are a bit sharper then the rest of the image. Flatten again.

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_09.jpg

The final step is to apply some unsharp mask filter (Filter -> Sharpen -> Unsharp Mask). Use the following values: Amount 100%, Radius 30.0 Pixels, Threshold 0. And ....

dave_hill_look_in_photoshop_11.jpg

Make sure you don't miss out on the next article - Register to the RSS feed or the newsletter.

Other Things You Might Wanna Try:
- Super Simple Light Tent
- Flash Mounted homemade DIY Softbox
- Homemade Cheap Flash Diffuser
- The Origami Studio (An Extrapolation to The $0.02 Macro Studio)


Comments

Doesn't really work for me

To be honest this doesn't really work for me. The original picture with some more contrast and sharpening would be a much better result IMHO. Of course it could work for other pictures, but not in this case.

Fantastic. This is a great

Fantastic. This is a great tutorial. I really like this look. I look forward to trying it out with some of my portraits! Thank you!

LucisArt

Although this looks good and free, I don't think it tops LucisArt with some masking and additional local contrast enhancement for that style.

I just try and use it sparingly because this enhanced local contrast or "Lucis look" (which is more accurate to me than the "Dave Hill look") is becoming as big a fad as HDR has become. It does work beautifully for dramatic skies however.

Too sharp

I don't like it. I prefer the original portrait but I guess it's all subjective in the end isn't it? It looks like it's been over oversharpened.

Brilliant Tutorial

I have been wondering how to create this effect simply for ages without combining multiple exposures of the same shot.

I will give this a try and let you know what I think!

Action

And here can I download the action for this. ;)

halos

It's important when using this technique that you watch for darkening or lightening at high-contrast points in the photo (such as the shoulders of the girl in the pink shirt). using layer masks and just painting over these points to hide them will get rid of the dark halos, giving the image a less forced look.

Thanks to all

Jeroen, Donncha - Thanks, I too love the original. I was looking for a happy picture to convert, but as one of my friends said - Kids need no tricks. They have a character of their own. On second look it does look over sharpened. The original looks OK on my screen. I think it may has to do with Flickr auto processing.

Dan - LucisArt is looks nice, can you tell more about it. The site is not the most revealing one.

Peter- Darn halos. I wonder if it is flickrs auto sharpen thingy? the original looked ok on my screen.

Alaska, Giles - Thanks.

Awesome. I actually found

Awesome. I actually found the same steps from the flickr group.
A lot of purists will give flak because Dave Hill uses lighting to achieve his distinct look (he's said as much himself & for a few brewskis he'll divulge his secrets), but without the $$$ to spend on a lighting set up like his, this is a great way to emulate a similar look; I've gotten compliments from others (read:non-photographers) on my attempts at it.

Not in the editing.

I agree, its not in the editing, its in the lighting. Good tutorial though

Problem with this

Every time I try this, I get blown out highlights on the cheeks. I followed this tutorial EXACTLY. What could be the problem?

Much much much to sharp.

It's just so sharp.
I think the "enhancing" is just overboard.
The halos and drop shadow like effect behind the girls is bothersome and the effect seems kinda overdone. I think it just looks gaudy...
but!!!
That's just me.
As a photographer it's just a shaky subject because ever since photoshop and digital manipulation became more accessible to the masses I've seen some very distasteful "enhancements" popping up here and there.

Dave Hill Action dowload

is there a place on the we b that i can get this action without all the red tape

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <a>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options