Six signs that you’ve over-processed your landscape photo

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

When you edit a landscape photo, it’s easy to get carried away. I know I’ve been guilty of it even years after being into photography. And many times, it’s not even easy to see when you’ve gone overboard. In this video, Mark Denney gives you six signs that will help you recognize when you’ve gone too far with the image editing. And when you learn to recognize them, they’ll help you improve your post-processing skill.

1. Detailed highlights

When you shoot into the sun, you will often get blown out sky. Thankfully, if you shoot RAW, you can bring back a lot of detail in the sky by bringing down the highlights. However, this will result in an unrealistic, overly detailed sun.

You can fix this by bringing down the highlights but then applying a radial filter to the sun. Add a bit of negative Dehaze, Texture and Contrast to make it brighter and more realistic. This will bring back those details in the sky without making the sun too detailed.

2. Dark corners

Dark corners appear if you add too much vignette to your image, and the point of a vignette is to be subtle and almost invisible. So, how can you tell? If you look at the photo and immediately see the vignette, you’ve added too much and need to tone it down.

3. Crunchy

Mark calls this sign “crunchy,” and I guess you can already tell what it is: oversharpening your photos. You can notice it when you zoom in and see “crunchy” surfaces. Also, you’ll know that you’ve overdone it if you see halos around distinct edges (like tree branches against the bright sky).

4. Heavy contrast

Sometimes we’re tempted to add more contrast than necessary, and we end up adding way too much. You’ll notice it when you look at the shadow area of your photo and see that you’ve lost all the detail in there.

5. Vivid shadows

This is quite the opposite of the previous one, and it’s about cranking up the shadows too much. It’s awesome that we can recover the detail in underexposed photos, but we don’t want to lose the shadows completely. If your photo gets an unrealistic look that resembles bad HDR, if the lighting looks flat, it means you’ve gone too far.

6. Color overload

Many of us have been there, especially in the beginning: oversaturating. It’s tricky to tell when you overdo it with saturation, which why it’s one of the most common mistakes people make.

But the solution always exists. Edit the photo the way you like it and walk away. Then, revisit the image an hour, two, or even a day later if you can give it that much time. Give your eyes some time to reset, you’ll see the photo differently when you get back to it.

I suggest that you also view the “before” and “after” of your photo when you’re done. This will help you determine how far you’ve gone from the original image and if you need to tone it down, and this is something I often do when I edit landscape photos in Lightroom.

Do you have any telltale signs that tell you when you’ve gone overboard with editing?

[6 Signs You’ve OVER-DEVELOPED Your Landscape Photo! | Mark Denney]


Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Đuđić

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, concerts, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

19 responses to “Six signs that you’ve over-processed your landscape photo”

  1. Michael Estwik Avatar

    Sounds like every Skylum commercial on FB.

    1. Guido Van Damme Avatar

      Michael Estwik And 90 % of all landscape photographs made with digital cameras.

    2. Michael Estwik Avatar

      Guido Van Damme then I’m happy to know that I belong to the 10% that doesn’t. ?

    3. Guido Van Damme Avatar

      Michael Estwik True! (just checked your website ;-) )

    4. Michael Estwik Avatar

      Guido Van Damme thank you! :-D

  2. Tom Jarane Avatar

    I do not want to make landscapes that look like “like it was when I took the photo” I want to make pictures, and I make them the way I like it. As easy as that.

    1. anthony marsh Avatar
      anthony marsh

      If you practice this you are a fraud!

      1. Kaouthia Avatar
        Kaouthia

        Why?

      2. Husselang Avatar
        Husselang

        If you’re a journalist or a crime scene photographer, sure. Not if you’re a landscape photographer.

  3. anthony marsh Avatar
    anthony marsh

    Let’s get real. EVERY landscape image made with a digital machine is over processed. There is little honesty in digital landscape images, add a bird, remove a bird, add water remove water, add a tree, remove a tree process the color into unrealistic grotesquery and a view of YOSEMITE will be made to look like a DISNEY animation cell from FROZEN and called a photograph.

    1. Kaouthia Avatar
      Kaouthia

      You know all of these things were possible in the darkroom, too?

    2. Charles Kung Avatar
      Charles Kung

      I disagree. There’s too much make up on a woman, acceptable amounts of make up, no make up, and then there’s the “no-make up make up”.

      That last one? That’s the sweet spot. The same applies to photo editing.

      1. Krissa Kinsale Avatar
        Krissa Kinsale

        Don’t hate on makeup!

        1. TwoMetreBill Avatar
          TwoMetreBill

          Makeup is for the herd who can’t think for themselves, same for those rats nests called fake eyelashes.

          1. Krissa Kinsale Avatar
            Krissa Kinsale

            I wear makeup. My wife wears makeup. Your opinion in unkind and misinformed.

          2. Filip Ruml Avatar
            Filip Ruml

            How? It’s just an analogy

  4. Arthur_P_Dent Avatar
    Arthur_P_Dent

    I agree on vignetting. I think most pictures do fine without it, and if it has to be done, it should be done so subtly that you don’t even notice it. I’ve seen so many people go overboard with it that it has become a cliché in its own right.

  5. Andy Dakin Avatar

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, there are purest and the contrary, kind of like fiction/non fiction books. It’s art enjoy it!!

  6. John Beatty Avatar
    John Beatty

    A photo taken of “what is there” is a snapshot. A photo taken to show what the photographer had envisioned is a photograph. I look at photography as an artist looks at a canvas. I go on trips and take shots of places I’ve been to record I’ve been there. I also go to places and shoot images I show as my artwork.