I was recently editing a set of photos for submission to my stock agency, when I realized how much my approach to photography has changed in just the last few years.
I think that this particular series of photos really illustrates how the ability to use high ISO has revolutionized photography in just the last couple of years, and why I think improvements to dynamic range should be the next revolution in photography.
Best Cameras for Low Light Photography
The Canon 5D Mk II, released way back in 2008 (!) was really the first modern camera to unlock the ability to photograph good quality images at high ISO settings. In fact, all of the photos in this post were taken with a Canon 5D Mk II.
In 2011 the release of the Fuji X series really unlocked the creative potential of high ISO low light photography. Then in 2012 the Nikon D800 brought high ISO image quality to a whole new level.
Modern low light champs like the Nikon D810 and the Sony Alpha A7 bring unprecedented image quality to extremely low light scenes, and we can expect that future cameras will continue to improve on these high ISO, low light capabilities.
(Unless camera manufacturers get side tracked by offering more megapixels again – don’t get me wrong, I love every single one of my Nikon D800’s 36 megapixels, but I love its image quality more).
Lets Go For A Hike In The Woods To See How High ISO Has Revolutionized Photography
Low Light, High ISO Image Sample 1:
To start off, lets (hypothetically) say that you are going for a hike mid-afternoon to go see some caves with your family. Its a bright, sunny, summer afternoon – but even on bright days open shade shadows can be pretty dark.
Canon 5D Mk II with Canon 20mm f/2.8 lens
1/60th, f/2.8, ISO 400
Low Light Image Analysis:
A photo like this is at the limits of what would have been possible with cameras before the Canon 5D Mk II. I am shooting at 1/60th which is about as slow of a shutter speed that I am comfortable with hand-held, I am using a fast 2.8 prime lens, wide open and ISO 400.
Low Light, High ISO Image Sample 2:
Next we start exploring some of the caves, walking into some of the cracks and crevices at the base of the Niagara Escarpment. Here we are going from open shade to deep shade.
5D Mk II with Canon 20mm f/2.8 lens
1/60th, f/2.8, ISO 800
Low Light Image Analysis:
In order to get a decent exposure in the mid-ground on my subject, I had to bump the ISO up to ISO 800.
This is also a perfect example of why improved native (as opposed to faking it with HDR) dynamic range needs to be the next priority for camera manufacturers. With the exposure I chose, I am severely clipping the highlights in the bright sunny forest and clipping the shadows further in the crevice. It is a tradeoff that doesn’t exist for a human eye viewing this scene.
Low Light, High ISO Image Sample 3:
Venturing into an actual cave, the only light source is the shaded sunshine at the relatively small mouth of the cave.
5D Mk II with Canon 20mm f/2.8 lens
1/60th, f/2.8, ISO 1600
Low Light Image Analysis:
I didn’t want to shoot hand-held with a shutter speed slower than 1/60th and f/2.8 was as big as my lens would go, so the only option to get the exposure I wanted was to go to ISO 1600.
Prior to today’s modern high ISO capabilities, I could have probably still made this shot work by using a tripod and a shutter speed of 1/15th, f/2.8 ISO 400 and telling my subjects to freeze during the exposure – but I would have been in the motion blur danger zone and this would have meant posing my scenes instead of capturing live action.
Low Light, High ISO Image Sample 4:
Moving even deeper into the cave system, I am in the dark (literally) with the only light coming from our flashlights and headlamps.
5D Mk II with Canon 20mm f/2.8 lens
1/60th, f/2.8, ISO 1600
Low Light Image Analysis:
I could have used about another 3/4 of a stop of light in these shots – but with the older Canon 5D Mk II I decided that I would probably get better quality results from brightening an ISO 1600 photo up by 3/4 of a stop in post, versus having to deal with the sensor noise from an ISO 3200 image capture.
The only way I could have pulled off these images without resorting to a high ISO would have been to resort to using strobes to mimic the beams from our flashlights. Using strobes would have resulted in very high quality images, much better than shooting ambient at high ISO – but aside from the logistics of packing multiple strobes, triggers and light stands for a family day hike – setting up multiple strobes and triggers while crawling around in a cave isn’t exactly the same as setting up a studio portrait.
Low Light, High ISO Image Sample 5:
In the final photo, I am as far into the cave system as my slightly overweight body will fit – I told the dude if he went any further he was on his own (he went about 10 feet past this point before he got scared and came back – this is his nuts-to-you-because-I’m-literally-out-of-the-reach-of-your-fat-ass face).
5D Mk II with Canon 28mm f/1.8 lens
1/30th, f/1.8, ISO 1600
Low Light Image Analysis:
The only light in this final photo is from the little LED headlamp on my son’s head. I switched to a 28mm f/1.8 lens to get a little more light from a slightly larger aperture, and I went down to a shutter speed of 1/30th by resting my elbows on the ground – but really its the ISO 1600 that makes this photo possible.
If I had one of the newer low light cameras with me instead of the (now) older 5D Mk II, I wouldn’t have hesitated to go to ISO 3200, 6400 or even higher.
When you stop to think about it, its just so amazing that you can take a photo like this, hand-held in nearly complete darkness and produce an image that is pretty close to how the scene looked to my eyes.
Dynamic Range – The Final Frontier
Which brings me back to what I see as the final frontier for digital camera image quality (and it ain’t megapixels):
Dynamic range.
If there is one thing that low light images like the ones in this post are lacking out of camera, it is a dynamic range that is remotely similar to what humans can see to the naked eye.
We can fake it in post to a certain extent – the shadows slider in Lightroom can do some pretty amazing things – but now that our cameras can practically see in the dark, if would be nice if what they saw had the dynamic range we can see by eye (or better!).
Have High ISO Low Light Capabilities Changed Your Photography
Has the ability to capture high quality images at very low light levels changed your approach to photography?
Is high ISO just a crutch that helps fauxtographers make due with ambient light and avoid learning how to use artificial light?
Would you like to see camera manufacturers pay more attention to increasing the native dynamic range of their cameras?
Leave a comment below and share your thoughts!
I totally agree with the dynamic range issue. As a D800 owner I can say that having a lot of DR is amazing. But nothing compare to the human eye. When will we be able to shoot daylight landscapes without burning the sky ? I’m not a imagery scientist, but i think that one major issue is to restitute the HDR captured lights in a realistic way on a screen.
You have DRI for that.
monitors and TV’s have less DR than cameras. and this won’t be solved until cheap laser diodes (to replace lcd cells) come on the scene. we have DR compression (aka tone mapping) as a work around. besides, would you really want a photo of a sunset blinding you while you’re watching tv in “real” HDR?
The 2011 D800e is still the sharpest camera ever tested by dxomark. ISO is great from 64 to out past 6400. That’s 100x dynamic range.
5d mark 2 “old”
ha, ha. don’t you just love the ways kids snub their noses at us sometimes. cool hike with the fam. it would be so awesome if all those high megapixels could do dual iso.
Cue up a roll of ISO 800 print film to remind yourself of where we’ve come over the last 15 years.
Honestly, I think Nikon’s D80 (circa 2006) had ISO noise that was roughly equivalent to equivalent speed film grain. Look at even newer cameras and their performance is just short of miraculous.
But I readily admit, in this respect, comparing film to digital is a non-starter. It’s like complaining you can’t get a clutch pedal is a performance car anymore: other technology has made manually engaging the transmission obsolete at the bleeding edge of performance.
I want a low ISO revolution. I’d love to be able to shoot at ISO25 without resorting to an ND Filter.
Your wish came true. The 2014 Nikon D810 is stunning at it’s base native ISO of 64. Unless you crop 2:1, you can’t see any difference at ISO 32. On the other end, ISO 6400 is still fine for newsprint. That is a 200x dynamic range.
When I saw that this was an article about High ISO and the photos are 1600 ISO, I had to check to see what year this was from. 1600 ISO was good in 2008.
In 2015, the $900 Nikon D5500 takes great shots at 12,800 ISO. Mirrorlesss are more like $700 wwith decent 12,800 ISO.
In 2014, the Nikon D4s was taking unbelievable action photos at 25,600 ISO and even 51,200.
Would you consider an article on how high ISO changed things in the last 7 years? “High ISO” is now 32 times higher than these photos from 2008.
The autor is right, the new era of photo matrix brigs us a new posibility. Now i am shot in range 1600-6400 , but danamicaal range is short not comparizible with film range. But yu have a posibil to shot HDR … It`s simple and usful.
I`m still shooting with 5D classic till ISO 1600, when I need more – I simply quit and put the camera in the bag
I shoot sports where it’s often poorly lit indoors or night outdoors at f/2.8. You trade ISO for shutter speed. Many stadiums have three full stops less light today with their high efficiency lighting. Out of the hundreds of shots in a night there is often not one as low as 1600 ISO. Sports and event photographers don’t have the luxury of quitting.
I forgot to add: “it depends…”
I shoot natural light portraits. For sports and events, I agree – its different
Was this near Rattlesnake point?
Close – Greigs Caves up near Lion’s Head.
“The Canon 5D Mk II, released way back in 2008 (!) was really the first
modern camera to unlock the ability to photograph good quality images at
high ISO settings.”
Sorry to disagree, but for my opinion that revolutionary camera was Nikon D3, which was released back at 2007(and D700, which brought the same sensor available for bigger masses). First good low-light Canon was 6D/5d3, released years later.
Now I’m D800 user and the dynamic range is really the next big thing ;)
i shoot iso 25 000 with my a7s with really good quality :)