100 megapixels: the new standard in photography

Blair Bunting

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

A career in commercial photography is a progression in learning. One that wains when complacency creeps in and thrives when pursuit of knowledge lives at its heart. Having a broad mind in both approach and equipment is the key to clearing your mind to be creative. Ironically, passion for technology and a yearning for nostalgia also contribute to the motivation to discover a new way to see the world around us. I have been through many technological breakthroughs in my short career, and some merit a milestone while others come off as gimmicks, only to be forgotten with the next camera release.

Hasselblad H6D-100c @ ISO 6400

When I was first starting in photography, digital was in its infancy. While the images from early DSLR’s don’t even hold up to modern day cell phones, the lessons we learned from them make us who we are. We began to see film as 1’s and 0’s and learned what a histogram was. As time went on and technology grew, we constantly compared digital to analog with the question, “is it equal to film?”

The ability for us to say yes to this question (at least in part) took many years (until 2006 more specifically) and arrived with the Nikon D3. While it wasn’t the highest resolution 35mm DSLR on the market (the Canon 1DsMk3 had 21MP) it was the first camera that had a sensor that produced files nearly indistinguishable from film. The noise of the file resembled true film grain and not the abstract mosaic patterns we had become accustomed. Film sensitivity and color reproduction was as if we were shooting chrome.

As time went on, other manufactures developed technology and sensors that caught on to what made the D3 so special. However, in 2008, Nikon released the D3x and further raised the level at which we perceived the digital vs. analog debate. As an aside, just let me say that our technological advances didn’t exist only with Nikon, but during this time period, they were the manufacture I used. If the Nikon D3 was the first camera equal to 35mm film, then the D3x was the camera that sharpened the pencil. Some made grandiose statements and said that the D3x was “Medium Format,” but let’s be honest, it was not.

With the subsequent releases of the Nikon D800, Canon 5DSR, and Sony A7R cameras we began to see refinement of files and exploration in resolution, but not an equivalence to the medium format film of our past. All too often a reviewer would get lost in the idea of shooting medium format via a 35mm DSLR, but with much time shooting many of these bodies, I can say it just isn’t true. The resolution of the cameras merely states how many pixels they crammed onto a sensor, but does not speak of the quality. Herein lies the quagmire of this all, we are discovering that resolution must marry color, latitude and other dynamics of a frame to produce a true medium format equivalent file.

Then came the 50 megapixel CMOS sensor that lived within cameras from Hasselblad, Phase One and Pentax. The sensor promised the high resolution as well as the latitude that CMOS chips offer. It wasn’t long before I was shooting one on set, but knew soon after that the files weren’t the end all medium format images I had hoped for. What they reminded me of were Leica images from the 35mm M bodies and nice glass.

If I were to try and best describe what the current 50MP range of cameras represent, the answer would be, reportage cameras. Cameras like the Hasselblad X1D remind me of what it was like to walk around the city with a Leica and create stories of light complimented by subtle strobes and a balance of ambient. The Pentax 645Z and Fuji GFX are in a sense compliments to this reality, although the slow shutter sync on these bodies make it hard for me to recommend them for use with lights as the blur with a 50MP sensor and a moving subject is VERY apparent.

This brings me to the dream I (and probably we) have had since I first decided I wanted to shoot advertising campaigns that would live on billboards, building and magazines alike. It was a dream to shoot digital files equal to the medium format film I grew up idolizing.

This dream finally became reality.

With much skepticism, but an equal amount of excitement, I ordered a Hasselblad H6D-100c. The camera had just been announced and the files I saw early on showed me more than just resolution, they showed me life, color and a quality that I had not seen in quite some time. While I wanted my ideas around this camera to be true, I had my guard up, for I had been let down by the Pentax 645Z that had preceded it. To be honest, I didn’t even buy the camera expecting it to be medium format incarnate, I bought it for the shutter sync speed, as I had always dreamed of a 1/2000th shutter on a strobe.

Like all cameras I have ever purchased, it arrived at 9pm, well after the light had left, which didn’t matter for it was a Saturday and we had a dinner party that would not allow me to hold even a 1/2000th shot still (read: “who wants an Old Fashioned?”). As the sun rose the next day and the fog of my eyes lifted, I took the H6D out to see what the world looked like in 100 megapixels and with two shots on the camera, I knew something special existed. I immediately called a friend and scheduled a walk at a nearby mountain range at sunset to test out the camera.

When we saw the images in the LCD of the camera, we were giddy with excitement. The colors, the contrast, the way the lenses produced nearly straight MTF chart quality images with flare nearly non-existent. We were seeing beauty that had not existed between the framelines for many years. I had shot other 100 MP cameras and fully expected to know what I was getting into with the 100c, but truth be told, the images I saw at that mountain range were as if I was seeing for the first time.

There is something intrinsically captivating about this pinnacle of photographic technology. I find myself looking at the world again with the drive to show it in ways that have not been seen before. From the detail of a cacti on a mountain half a mile away, to the ability to see the world at ISO 6400 without the need of a tripod, I have had to rethink what the limits of photography are.

About the Author

Blair Bunting is an advertising photographer from Los Angeles. He has won numerous awards and worked with the clients such as Discovery Channel, Pepsi, Disney, Adidas, Nikon, to name a few. If you would like to see more of his work, visit his website, read his blog, follow him on Instagram and Twitter and like his Facebook page. This article was also published here and shared with permission.


Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

DIPY Icon

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 responses to “100 megapixels: the new standard in photography”

  1. Paul Richards Avatar

    not for a long time. not needed by most clients, and computers aren’t really built batch processing those size files

    1. Stefan Kohler Avatar

      Computers will get used to it – as soon as there is a market.
      Faster computers -> higher requirements for standard software -> you need faster computers to run standard software … that’s how it is.

      10 years ago they said: “10 Megapixel? Who would need that and for what do you need these monster files and who can handle the massive backups?”

      1. jakecarvey Avatar
        jakecarvey

        computing power cost power consumption has peaked for now. Moore’s law is irrelevant in general now, as 99% of consumers and invidual business buyers dont need more computing power, and the cost for agressive additional progress far outweighs the revnue potential compared to miniaturization

      2. jakecarvey Avatar
        jakecarvey

        the next big leap in computing power will obliterate Moore’s law by a massive order of magnitude (rather then the double double every 18 months)

        and storage will logically make the same leap (i would think)

    2. Paul Richards Avatar

      Stefan Kohler yes I agree with that, but when the vast majority of images are used purely on screen, there is no reason for that many mp when the screens can’t show it. For people that print, yes higher mp are important, but those people are in the minority compared to the mass public who do nothing more than put images on social media

    3. Stefan Kohler Avatar

      Paul that theory would make all cameras above 4mp obsolete.

    4. Paul Richards Avatar

      Stefan Kohler not sure about that, but I get your drift. Its not all about mp, the goal should be better dynamic range, and increasing quality at higher iso’s. the mp battle is one that canon and nikon had a go at, but I think that although they do have their higher mp ‘flagships’ the vast majority of sales are from the lower mp cameras, and they realise that

    5. Kai Tug Avatar

      That’s as it is with all the 4k, 6k and 8k video arguments. You might not need it that large and you might not be able to view it or print it full size.

      But there’s more to it than a big ass size. Details for retouching, downsampling, possibility to crop a lot without losing quality – and yes, printing big ass wall prints

  2. Rex Deaver Avatar
    Rex Deaver

    When will the megapixel wars be over? Short of billboards, such resolutions are ridiculous overkill that 99.9999999% of photographers have precisely 0% use for. Claiming this is the “standard” misleads less experienced photographers into believing they cannot ever be “good” unless they spend unnecessary amounts of money on such cameras.

    This is a niche camere, not a standard camera.

    1. pincherio Avatar
      pincherio

      I think he means “the gold standard.” From the way he was gushing about the images, you’d think he was looking at porn.

  3. John Wojciechowski Avatar

    Only if they come up with a significant lossless compression technology for processing and especially storage. We’ll be using 4TB drives like floppy disks.

  4. Ian Gwaltney Avatar

    Only if a 100TB drive come standard in all computers.

  5. Andrea Gruber Avatar

    Standard is something a majority of people use or do. One day it might be normal, for now? Not so much.

  6. jakecarvey Avatar
    jakecarvey

    minor spelling…. “one that wanes” as in, “the waning moon”