This is why you should post-process your photography
Jan 4, 2017
Patrick Beggan
Share:

I took the best photo of my life today. I came down from the mountain and loaded it up on my computer. When I brought the photos up on my screen, they were just trees. Bummer. But it felt so good; looked so good on my camera’s LCD. What’s the deal with that?
This is why processing is the key to a great image. This is why revision is the key to great writing. Polish your gemstones. A great thought, a great idea, a great RAW is only just the beginning of something better. It is a seed. Without nurturing and pruning, it really is nothing special.
Editor’s Note : You can find out more about Patrick and see his work over on his website at Versa Photography.
Lots of people have great ideas. Lots of people witness great moments. But there is an art to the witnessing, an art to seeing. And with art, the more you perfect your process the better you are. So take this to photography. See, capture and then refine. What is your image really about? Graphically, what elements of your image focus things and what elements muddle things? This is where you enhance the focusing aspects and mitigate the muddling. That is what processing is. You are tuning your vision.
When you see with your eyes, your brain does this. When you shoot staight to jpeg, your camera’s firmware does this. It happens no matter what, it is an element of seeing. Simplification and processing must happen to see an image. There is truly no way to capture an image without some kind of refinement happening whether you like it or not. Pinhole camera? Guess what, the physics of the pinhole are simplifying the scene — hell even the availability of light simplify the scene. Reality is incredibly complex. To record it, you must simplify.
Too, you must maintain control over that simplification. To be an artist, you should be the one at the helm of the process. Don’t let the engineers that designed your camera’s firmware make your images — make them yourself. The beauty you saw, you were the one who saw it and you know best what exactly you were seeing. So make sure others see it, and highlight it.
Your sensor is a data collection tool. Just because Lightroom takes my camera’s RAW and runs it through its own color profiles and default settings doesn’t mean that is what my image is–the changes I make are not lies to make it look good. An unmodified JPG output from a raw isn’t the last word — it’s an average of what the camera recorded. My image is what I saw when I was there and more so what I felt when I was there. It is important to remember that seeing and that feeling and use the data your sensor collected to recreate it. This is the art of photography.
So this is that disconnect you will sometimes get when you load your photos onto your computer. Once they are large in Lightroom or Capture One or Photoshop RAW and zeroed, you might think that you were crazy when you felt what you did. But you are not. This is just the feeling of being at the beginning of a pile of work. Get your waders on, time to get wet.
This is what a random person with an iPhone can’t reproduce. This is what takes love and loss and commitment to create. This is photography; this is being a photographer. It is being there with the equipment and seeing. It is then knowing that you’re still hours from a final product, even with mastery of the mechanical end of things. It is knowing still that you can do it, that you can reproduce the true seeing and feeling of being there, in that moment, even if straight from your camera there’s a disconnect.
Time to put your head down and use your memory. Time to make some artistic decisions and feel what you felt when you were there in that moment. Time to get to work. And whenever someone uses the hashtag #nofilter, ignore them and move on in your life. Because when you think about it, even #nofilter is a filter.
About the Author
Patrick Beggan has been practicing photography for over 15 years, creating award-winning landscapes (Essence of Bellingham contest, Pacific Crest Trail Association Photo of the Year) as well as commercial work for individuals and organizations such as the Downtown Bellingham Partnership, Make.Shift Art Space, Subdued Stringband Jamboree, Bayou on Bay and others. You can see his work on his website, Flickr, 500px, Model Mayhem, Ello and Instagram. For any questions or inquiries you might have, you can contact him via his website or visit his Facebook page. This article was also published here and used with permission.

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.




































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
13 responses to “This is why you should post-process your photography”
Before and after shots would be nice in this.
Closest thing: http://versaphotography.com/archives/the-process-of-photo-processing/
Well said. I suspect the whole straight out of camera thing started with someone who either couldn’t or didn’t want to learn the ins and outs of processing. Honestly with film most of us just took what the lab processed and that probably contributed.
For me digital finally gave me some small slice of what Ansel Adams must have felt. It made me think more about how I could REALLY represent what I was seeing and thinking at the time. I’m not a fan of cranking up the saturation or really anything else but I always find that I need to modern day dodge, burn, adjust black point, white point, contrast, etc. If I want to take it further and make it less of a photo and more of an interpretation I don’t lie or exaggerate but I want what is in my thoughts to be what is exhibited. A lot of times that may be tint or layered textures or faded edges or whatever but never a formula.
If my eyes looking at a “super moon” can interpret both the moon and buildings in the foreground as believable why shouldn’t I combine the 2 exposures better than my camera can in a single shot? Of course when I explain it to non-photographers their interpretation is that I “Photoshopped it.” Yea I did but it was to represent what my eyes and brain interpreted.
Many smart phone photographers kind of try to do this with some filter someone else came up with but they all fall short to me. I generally don’t get any thrill out of a shot where I don’t have the same creative control and the machine / software is doing the thinking.
SOOC just means you’re lazy. ;)
Shooting slides isn’t for the lazy photographer.
Howardo Mansfieldio
No, it’s for the archaic photographer. ;)
Howardo, the act of using slide film, you’ve already made a choice that digital users only have available to them in post.
Just choosing to go with Velvia over Kodachrome changes how your image will look. Digital users don’t have that option. So, it’s not really an even comparison. :)
Personally, what people do, and what people think other people should do with their photos, is an even more tedious argument than Canon vs Nikon.
It’s your photo. Take it using whatever method you want. Do as much or as little post as you want.
Personally, before I shoot, I already have in mind what kind of post processing I will use.
I took good pictures for years but always felt deflated when I compared them to other professional photographers’ work. I just figured I needed to get better. Then, I found Lightroom. What a difference! I was able to represent the feeling I wanted to share, and my pictures went from good to wow. I used to believe great photographers did not edit, that they captured those amazing shots in frame, no modification. Hardly. I will never go back to sans post production.
I shoot a lot in theatrical settings. What works on stage doesn’t always translate well to the camera’s image, even when the settings are all spot on. Like Catlett’s comment, I edit for white balance, shadows, highlights, etc. but as a rule don’t filter as I’m trying to highlight the performance, set design, venue ambiance. I’ve found cautious use of Lightroom’s circular gradient tool has been very helpful in this, particulary when some performers aren’t as well lit as others. It’s a question of bringing the image as close as possible to what most effectively portrays the performance that took place.
Post-processing is like the spices on my food: without it, eating would be so boring and tasteless. Same goes for my pictures :)
Very good article. So so true!