Recent Posts | Share a Tip | Back to Basics | Reader Photos | Forum | Subscribe
Home Studio | Tutorials | Readers Projects
Back in the take a shot and see the print three days later good old happy days of film we all knew what is our human limitation when it came to shutter speed. The golden thumb rule said that if you shoot slower than 1 / (your focal length) you will end up with an unusable artistic blurry image.
Just to give an example or two it means that at shooting safari animals at 300mm meant you can not go below 1/400. And when shooting portraits at 80mm, you should not go below 1/75 or 1/100.
Of course this rule had some exceptions, especially if you were an FBI hitter and could keep a concrete steady hand for minutes at a time. Well, this does not apply for the most of us. Especially not to me. I shake like an earthquake while holding a camera. I lost one of my favorite shots to the shakes. It was sunrise at Messada, and the light was low and golden. I took a picture of one of the older guys holding a prayer book along with a knife in the same hand. A great frame (130mm@1/50). Only at home when going through he images I was upset to find out that the shot was blurred and as sharp as a brick. Take a look your self (Holy cow, I make mistakes too).

(Click on the image to see my floop supersized)
With the entrance of digital cameras, the rule was changed a bit. Now it is don't shoot slower then 1/(focal length * crop factor). Most DSLRs has this factor set to 1.5 (Nikon) or 1.6 (Canon). But this is still just a thumb rule. The best way to learn what is your shake limit is to conduct a test.
Now go home, and over a nice cup of coffee analyze the results. Basically, this test will reveal your chances of winning a gun duel (or how steady you are). You should be able to fund the shutter speed at which you are still sharp. After you are done, you will know your limits.
Below you will find my personal tests - I made several: First test was done with the with the Nikon 18-200 VR (B&H) @200mm with VR on; The second for the second test, I used the same settings only turned the VR off; The third test was done with the great one-and-only Nikkor 50mm prime f/1.8 (B&H); and last but not least I tested with the excellent Nikon 85mm prime lens (B&H), on which I'll write a review soon. Click any of the images to view the large version (recommended for comparison).
200mm VR on - Blur point @ 1/100
200mm VR off - Blur point @ 1/200
50mm - Blur point @ 1/100
85mm - Blur point @ 1/200
On 200mm I can shoot down to 1/200 with no VR and have acceptable result. (This is just what the thumb rule says, when you take the D70 1.5 crop factor into account). Turning the VR on, got me to 1/100, but not more.
With the Nikon 85mm, anything less then 1/200 was a bit fuzzy and shooting at 1/50 gave the nice quality of a sea at storm.
The 50mm could take it up to the 1/100 spot.
The final conclusion is that I am a human being and I should stick to the thumb rule. I do have a friend however, that can go 2 stops below 1/focal length, hand-held, and still get a sharp image. What I'm saying is that you should do the test and know your limits, so you won't get disappointed later. I'd love it if you shared your results in the comments. Let's see who is the steadiest man in the Wild West, and who like me, can not hold steady if my life depended on it.
The easiest option is to bump the ISO setting up. When you do so and leave the aperture untouched, you can get smaller shutter speeds. There is a cost however; higher ISO setting will have lower image quality. Remember: A noisy image is something you can use; a blurry image is a dead one. Just remember - knock the ISO down again when you are done.
If you can not bump up the ISO, you can use some accessories to stabilize your camera (I'm ruling out the tripod solution, as we are looking for a hand held solution): you can use a monopod (or make one yourself), and use can use a string stabilizer.
You can also turn the VR feature of your lens on. Don't have VR on your lens? Be prepared to say good-by to a nice bundle of money.
Have more methods to eliminate blur? Share them with us on the comments.
Make sure you don't miss out on the next article - Register to the RSS feed or the newsletter.
Comments
1/25
Is it me or are your shots in the first two tests at 200mm showing a more in focus image than shooting at 1/50th? And at 200 no VR, as good as 1/100th??
this was one of the weirder results
For 4 times in a row, I got better results for 1/25 then for 1/50. although non is shatp enough for me.
For me the VR gained only one stop. I plan to repeat the test with better lighting conditions.
so, at what ISO did you shoot this test?
you mention the possibility of improving shots by increasing the ISO, but you didn't post that info on the results.
also, did you just do single shots at each speed? one thing that i've found to cheat "the rule" is to shoot in bursts of 3-5 shots, as i finish exhaling, and get rather acceptable shots down to 1/4 sec. out of each burst.
ISO was set at 400
It was better if I could shoot at 200 (the lowest my D70 will allow), but then I would not have been able to do the 1/400 test. (I had it a bit under as it was).
good article, however I
good article, however I don't see the irony in holding a knife and a prayer book, a knife in of itself is in no way contrary to prayer nor for many people is the sacrifice of animals, therefor there is no juxtaposition or contradiction to result in irony.
no irony
just a good picture wasted because of not using the correct exposure.
The story of Massada relates well to both weapons and religion. This is why the picturehad some very good context.
uhm, there is the string
uhm, there is the string monopod :)
http://www.instructables.com/id/String-Tripod/
Instructables rocks
The string tripod is a great way to gain a stop or two.
VR or no VR?
Is it possible that you've exchanged VR and non-VR results?
nope
The results with VR are better, both for 1/25, 1/6 and 1/100
Please check your posted
Please check your posted results again. In the figure captions you have swapped the results for VR and no VR. VR on shoud be at 100 and no VR at 200
you have:
200mm VR on - Blur point @ 1/200
200mm VR off - Blur point @ 1/100
love the site by the way
Thansk man, the captions were wrong
Fixed!!!
NcNally: Da Grip
Hi there,
good idea to verify the old rule of thumb for your own thumb... (or hand etc.)
Joe McNally's article
http://www.joemcnally.com/blog/2008/03/10/da-grip/
can probably help some of us increasing our chances when it comes to minimizing blur. And if not it's still a good read, gotta love his style.
Cheers
Till
Thanks for sharing this Till
I just love Joe's Blog. Tons of great info and he does havea really great personal style.
Gotta admit, I did not try the grip on the bottom yet. it looks weird. I'll give it a shot next time I out shooting.
More than once maybe?
You should probably try to do the test more than once for some consistency.
With your 200mm tests, 1/50 is much worse than 1/25 in both cases.
Using the neckstrap
When I really need a steady shot, I usually put the neck strap around my neck, and then I stretch out the camera as far as possible, tensing the neck strap as much as I can. If I do so, I can shoot much steadier compared to when I'm looking through the viewfinder. The downside of this is that I can not see exactly how I'm shooting, thus making it harder to compose the image.
With A Nikon D80
First of all this is great information and as an ameture it really put a few peices of "MY" puzzel togther, great work. As well, it knocks a few peices loose, which brings me to a few questions. First how would you incorperate flash and/ or sync speed into this. You can get a 1/400 shutter speed (in Shutter Priority using a Nikon D80) but not a 1/400 sync speed. Are you even using flash. If not, does the shutter priority correct the apeture to get enough light to expose the image. Sorry if this is confusing or down right dumb on my part, remeber I am an ameture (LOL). Thanks for the post and all the work you do.
Tracey
Tracey on the D80 you can
Tracey on the D80 you can enable AutoFP Sync (custom menu #25) on the camera to sync at speeds greater than 1/200s.
Funny, I've never heard it that way
I've never heard it expressed that way before and I've been shooting for 35 years. But it makes so much sense. It turns out I've been going by the rule of thumb all along and didn't know it.
My rule of thumb was always 1/60 sec. was safe, handheld with a normal lens. Anything slower and take a rest. Faster shutter speeds with longer lenses or take a better rest.
I just never put the numbers to it. Now I will. Thanks.
Using the neckstrap
I use the neck strap in a similar way to Pestbarn, although shorten the strap and move one of the sides of the strap under my arm. This means that the strap is ultra tight, this method also means that you can see through the eye piece allowing composition to be determined.
Post new comment