Patent suggests Olympus wants to become astrophotography king with new “astrotracer” feature

Oct 1, 2021

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Patent suggests Olympus wants to become astrophotography king with new “astrotracer” feature

Oct 1, 2021

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

Well, this is interesting. It seems that Olympus (AKA OM Digital) might be looking towards the stars. A new Japanese patent describes a new Micro Four Thirds system with a built-in “astrotracer” feature. Essentially they want the sensor to track the motion of the stars so that you can get longer exposures at night without getting blur from the planet’s rotation.

It’s a nifty sounding feature and it’s one we’ve actually seen before, although it’s perhaps not surprising that most people have never heard of it, as it was found in the Pentax K1 Mark II, amongst others. They both appear to work in a similar way, too, with the sensor moving to compensate for the earth’s rotation and keep the stars in the same part of the sensor.

The patent describes a number of processes for how astrophotography tracking can be done, including using a gimbal/gantry to rotate along various axes to counter the earth’s rotation, before finally moving onto the sensor, which appears to be one of the primary points of this patent. They even reference the Ricoh patent, entitled Patent Document 1 in their own application.

As another method of moving the field of view, there is a method of tracking the movement of a celestial body using a camera shake correction mechanism. For example, as disclosed in Patent Document 1, the latitude information of the shooting point, the shooting orientation angle information, the shooting elevation angle information, the attitude information of the shooting device, and the focal length information of the shooting optical system are input. Using all the input information, the relative movement amount with respect to the photographing device for fixing the astronomical image with respect to a predetermined imaging region of the imaging element is calculated. Then, based on the calculated relative movement amount, at least one of the predetermined imaging region and the celestial body image is moved to take a picture, thereby realizing the shooting following the movement of the celestial body.

As a refresher, here’s a (super super basic) summary (you have to do a lot of reading between the lines) the Pentax system works…

YouTube video

Olympus goes on to explain both the advantages and the big problem with Ricoh’s implementation of this technology. Basically, it’s easy to implement but that it has limited movement. The Olympus solution, unless I’m reading this wrong (or Google’s not translating it as well as it could) proposes combining the sensor-shift along with cropping, tracking, aligning and stitching (in real-time) to build up a single exposure over time.

So, think of it like shooting a bunch of images and then aligning and stacking in Photoshop and then cropping down to eliminate all the parts that weren’t seen by every image in the sequence. This fundamentally appears to work the same way, except it’s all done in-camera. This sort of thing would make a lot of sense for Olympus given some of their other long exposure features like Live Composite mode.

It’s an interesting if very long patent, and I haven’t managed to make my way through the whole thing yet. It looks like the patent was actually filed when Olympus was still Olympus and not OM Digital Solutions. So, whether or not we’ll actually see this come to a future body is unknown. But with OM Digital taking as yet unknown directions with the brand’s future, I wouldn’t put it out of the realm of possibility.

You can read the entire patent here.

[via 43Rumors]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 responses to “Patent suggests Olympus wants to become astrophotography king with new “astrotracer” feature”

  1. lewisfrancis Avatar
    lewisfrancis

    Neat idea, and one that would be quite welcome in m43-land.

  2. nite Avatar
    nite

    As an astrophotographyer and Olympus fan: not gonna happen. I love my EM-1 but it is garbage for astrohotos. Unleas they can come out with a senaor that can compete with the Eos R or A7S, it doesn’t matter what software tricks the camera can do. The Olympus m4/3 aensors are noisy and lousy at high iso.

    Cancelling the earths rotation is easy with a $300 camera tracker. No need for the sensor to do it.

    1. nite Avatar
      nite

      Furthermore. This kind of in body processing is to compete with Apple and Android. Not an Eos R wirh Photoshop.

      And way not a ASI1600 and Pixinsight.

  3. Cuiv Avatar
    Cuiv

    OK so you’re indeed reading it wrong – I read through some of the main parts of the patent in the native Japanese, and this is about combining an Olympus camera with an AltAz mount in order to achieve something similar to an equatorial mount. In other words, it’s a derotator for AltAz, using the camera’s IBIS. It’s very different from Astrotracer in that it’s not supposed to be standalone.