How to overpower the daylight with flash to shoot flowers and macro
Jan 19, 2018
Share:
Overpowering the sun with flash is typically something we typically associate with photographing people. But it’s a principle that scales down extremely well for photographing things like flowers, bugs and other outdoor macro subjects. In fact, it’s even easier to do with such small subjects because you can get the flashes so close to them, retaining more of that power. In this video, photographer Ed Verosky explores the topic, with lots of practical examples.
First, Ed explains the principles in the studio, using continuous lights to simulate the natural outdoor light. He shows how to get a good exposure using the natural light, and then how to overpower it with the use of a speedlight. For most indoor settings, pretty much any speedlight or flash should work for this. If, even at minimum power, it’s too bright, you can always add ND gels over the end of the flash to cut it even more.
And the final result looks pretty good. The continuous light from the two small softboxes has been completely killed and the subject is being lit by the flash. Remember, those continuous lights are only there to demonstrate the principle and simulate a continuous daylight light source. They’re not contributing to the shot. In indoor settings like this, though, one thing you’ll want to watch out for is light from the flash spilling onto the environment, as you can see in the bottom right of the image below.
Ed then takes the whole setup outdoors to overpower the actual daylight. The process is exactly the same. You want to create an ambient exposure without flash that kills the levels to a value you’re happy with. Essentially you want a very dark, almost black, shot. Then you add flash to just the subject you wish to expose.
Again, the results are very similar to those in the studio. A dark background, with well exposed flowers. You’ll note here, though, that Ed doesn’t have the problem of light spill, because the environment behind the flowers is so far away.
Ed then looks for the brightest part of the environment to use as his background, which is the sky. Here, the situation is a little different as Ed has to go way beyond his sync speed in order to make the sky dark enough. In these sorts of situations, you’ll need a flash capable of high-speed sync. You could go with neutral density filters in front of the lens, instead, but if you’re shooting a DSLR, that’ll make it difficult to see your subject.
As you can see, though, it handles it very well. The only real difference between doing this with flowers and people is that you need more powerful lights. I do this often with the Godox AD360II outdoors for people. But for small subjects like these, speedlights will often do the job just fine.
So, if you’re a nature or macro shooter in the outdoors and don’t already use a speedlight, it might be worth picking on up. They’re not even that expensive anymore.
John Aldred
John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.









































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
2 responses to “How to overpower the daylight with flash to shoot flowers and macro”
This is the way to do it to kill the ambient light (specifically the sun) to go with a high shutter speed. But the thing is, and I’m not sure about other photographers around, we usually start designing the shot with the depth of field in our mind; Meaning: the depth of field is a priority, and usually we set it first to what we really “visualize” about the shot, and then fix everything depending on that point (fixing ISO and the shutter speed) – I seldom change the depth of field in favor of keeping the shutter within the limits of the sync speed (and probably never did).
It sounds like the same thing. I haven’t tried again since the first time that I failed. I was just going by what someone told me. Having this link to look at probably will help me to figure out what I did wrong. Thanks!