Lighting Modifiers Cheat Sheet Card
So we had a Portrait Lighting Cheat Sheet that was designed to help placing the light in space around the model. While I called it portrait lighting cheat sheet card, I was only telling half of the truth.
The half that I did not include in that card was how different modifiers will change the light falling on your subject.
It is time to correct this wrong, so this lighting modifiers cheat sheet completes this gap.
There are some new things on this sheet, like a perfectly still model, dark walls to control reflections and a few beers that you can not spot in the actual card. But they were there. Trust me.

You can download a "super size" here.
Again, we tried to keep it simple. We usually ask a wife or a boss to model for those kinda things, but since the differences between the modifiers can be subtle we wanted to keep everything constant but the light. So... We asked Lady Plastic to come to our aid on this one. She kindly agreed or at least did not mind.
What's In The Card?
The card is divided into four sections, each dealing with a different type of modifiers. While there are lots more modifiers out there, I tried to include the more common ones.
Softboxes:
- 90x120cm Rectangle softbox
- 90x90cm Square softbox
- 20x90cm strip light in both vertical and horizontal positions and with grid
Umbrellas:
- A Compact 43" White Satin Umbrella as a shoot through
- 43" White reflective umbrella
- 45" Silver reflective umbrella
Restrictors:
And some Miscellaneous
- 7" reflector
- 240 x 50cm DIY V-card
- Gridded and non gridded 55cm beauty dish
- 550EXII driven 28" Apollo
I have included links to products like the ones I used for the cheat sheet. While the brand is not always matching, the characteristics of the modifies remain (i.e. recessed Vs. not recessed, single screen Vs. Double baffle and so on.
Things To Notice
When choosing alight modifier there are several things you may want to notice.
Is The Light Hard Or Soft?
This is a relativity easy one, the bigger the light source the softer the light. This can be seen by comparing the square 80cm softbox with the rectangle 80x120 softbox. To compare check out the 7" reflector on the bottom.
It is seen again when comparing the gradients on the 90x20 and 20x90 strip lights (OK, this is the same modifier mounted differently). When mounted vertically there are hard left to right gradients, and when mounted horizontally those become softer.
Is The Light Controlled?
By this I mean, is it hitting only where you want it to hit? Again several interesting observations:
I used three umbrellas and the shoot through umbrella was the best when it comes to contaminating the backdrop. Since the light can be treated as if coming from the umbrella, the model-to-light and backdrop-to-light ratio is about 1/2. When using a reflective umbrella the model-to-light and backdrop-to-light is about 2/3 so light on the backdrop is way more noticeable.
The best tools for taming light were (obviously) the grid and snoot. I was surprised to learn that the grid was more effective than the snoot and surprised again to see how limited barndoors are.
On the "others" raw I was not surprised, yet happy to discover under "scientific conditions" just how well the V card works for diffusion. It is basically a 240x50 cm light source and the light is soft accordingly.
Color Shift:
Last but not least, I wanted to refer to the color shift, we used the same flash for the entire test, however, not all the images are color balanced. I can attribute this to two factors: Some modifiers needed stronger bursts of light, on some flash models this can cause a color shift. More importantly is that the light did not arrive directly from the flash. It went through/bounced/reflected of a modifier, I suspect that not all modifiers have the same color shift properties.
How The Card Was Made
I hooked up with Ron Uriel a commercial photographer for this one. As he has more modifiers, and most of them are not DIYed too :)
Gear wise, we used an EOS 5D mark ii with a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM. All Images (exuding the Apollo) were shot at ISO 100 / F11 with an old Bowens Espirt as single light source.
Here is a picture of the setup. It is about 130 cm from plastic nose to lens and about one meter from Plastic to backdrop.

We used a light meter to measure f/11 on Lady Plastic's nose for each of the modifiers. Had to do this since each modifier "eats up" different amount of light.
Using The Card
As with all the Cheat Sheet Cards, feel free to print, share and reuse the card in a non commercial way. It is licensed under CC just for that.
Get the DIYP greatness via RSS, newsletter and Twitter
Connect with the community:Facebook Page, Discussions, Readers Projects
Share Ideas, Setups, Images and Projects on DIYP's Flickr, visit Readers Photos










Comments
This is awesome
Wow... This is awesome!!
Exactly what I need right now...
Thanks
This is unbelievably
This is unbelievably helpful! My only question is, you only specify the distance from light source to subject at the end, but you previously mention hard and soft light. Light becomes harder when you move the source further away, softer when you move it closer, regardless of modification. Might be worth clarifying. Also, broad-side lighting is used for this demo, which rarely looks good on actual people, is there a reason you chose this?
Either way, every studio photographer should have a print of this for quick reference.
re: cheat sheet
hi Mike,
thanks for the warm word. It is true that the light softness is impacted from the relative size of the light source. Key word here is relative, that means that the same light source will be softer if brought closer to the model.
Since I kept my light source at a constant position, the distance did not really play a part in this demo.
As for broad side lighting, we tried both, Lady Plastic looked better in broad :) and did not agreed to be pictured in any other way
Wonderful tips. Great
Wonderful tips. Great addition to the other Entry.
Great!
Thanks a lot for that!
ungrateful wretch…
I don't want to sound like an ungrateful wretch, because this is a very helpful card!
But are you sure you metered f/11 on every shot? There's no way the gridded snoot is f/11, can't be! And the white reflective umbrella appears to be very hot.
All in all, very useful though. For one thing, it reminds me that just because there are many types of light modifiers doesn't mean I need to OWN many types of light modifiers. Many of them do similar things.
re: wretch
Hi Matt,
not at all. Actually the only exception was the gridded snoot and I did take a note about the meter's reading to include it in the post. Sadly I no longer have the note. That'll teach me to throw away notes...
It was a significant hit too, even when popping at full power. Thanks for highlighting this.
There is actually a benefit
There is actually a benefit to doing the card both ways (NOT that I'm suggesting you need to do that!). Keeping the exposure constant shows how a given modifer attenuates the light. Whereas adjusting the exposure to be constant will give a better idea of light hardness, spill and falloff. You've mostly done the latter, with the exception of the grid. Perhaps it would be fair and reasonable to tweak the exposure of the grid shot in post, to make it comparable? Ah just leave it, it's great what you've done.
BTW I always see this when I want to make a comment on the new site, but I'm able to comment just fine (and I do have javascript enabled):
"Submission of a form on this page has been disabled as you do not have JavaScript enabled in your browser."
re: constant power
Matt, don't get me tempted...
As for light attenuacy, I am not sure it is worth the effort. I mean, each manufacturer will have their own fabrics, level of reflection inside the modifier and so on. those will vary so much between different vendors, that a cheat sheet will be a very poor resource.
That comment you are seeing is my attack Vs. spam bots. Are you seeing it on top of every post, or only when you actually make the comment? this will help me to tune it better.
Great reference
So glad to see someone took the time to make such a comprehensive lighting card. Kudos and cheers.
http://www.guessthelighting.com
re: Great reference
Hi ted,
Thanks for stopping by. love the guess the lighting blog, the daily mental exercise rocks. (though I rarely get the "full picture").
Post new comment