Four composition mistake every photographer should avoid
Sep 11, 2017
Share:
There are lots of “rules” when it comes to composition. Guidelines that are great starting points for those just starting out. Adhering to these rules does not mean you will create a masterpiece every time, though. Nor does breaking them mean your photos will suck. But there are some aesthetic things that these “rules” often tend to not mention.
In this video, photographer Evan Ranft talks us through 4 common composition mistakes that every photographer makes. He’s made them, I’ve certainly made them. You, too, either have or will make them at some point in your photography journey. But they can be avoided, if you can spot when you’re doing them.
1. Double Subject
The “Double Subject” is what Evan calls a photograph which tries to feature two subjects in the same shot. The example he shows is a location shot containing both a human subject and a waterfall. The brightness of the waterfall just screams for your attention. But you want to look at the person. Your eye just doesn’t know where to settle.
Evan’s “fixed” version of the image also includes both subjects, but in a much more pleasing way. There’s no doubt now who the subject of the image is, while still including the waterfall.
2. The Look Out
The Look Out is one that I’ve mixed feelings over, more recently. Since watching TV shows like Mr Robot, these seemingly awkward compositions can actually be very effective. Like many of the more technical composition rules, though, this is one you need to understand before you can break it. Typically, you want your subject looking into the shot, to direct the viewer’s eye, rather than looking out.
3. Tangents
This one means that you have your subject with something in the background that draws a line through the subject. It could be the vertical lines of a tree or building, or the horizontal line along the top of a fence or wall. Perhaps even the horizon of the environment itself. They cut up your image, detract from your subject, and make the overall composition quite confusing.
4. Being Lazy
The lazy composition is one that most of us do. It’s just something we don’t really think about until we force ourselves to do it often that it simply becomes a habit. Evan provides an example he calls “the pet photo test”. This is how most people who aren’t used to photographing animals would typically photograph a pet. In this case, the dog of Evan’s parents.
Fixing this one is simply a matter of perspective. Getting down to the dog’s level creates a more intimate look. The dog suddenly becomes the hero, not something upon which the photographer looks down.
Four simple composition mistakes that all of us have made at some point. I know I’m certainly guilty of making these mistakes before now. I still occasionally make them today when I’m not paying attention to what I’m doing.
What mistakes do you see most often? What mistakes do you find yourself regularly making?
John Aldred
John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.













































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
7 responses to “Four composition mistake every photographer should avoid”
Great advice
The tangent thing is actually a little beside the point at least from the perspective of classical art composition. These kinds of tangents are only problematic if they are sprouting out like antlers from a person’s head. However lines in the background can be broken by a body – this actually creates depth. The only thing one needs to pay attention when doing it is no have enough tonal differency (contrast) between the subject and the pattern in the background.
I was thinking the same exact thing. I didn’t agree worth that statement in the article
At least we don’t have to deal with grammar. Doesn’t anyone check this stuff?
Do not apply this on Instagrammers !
Break every rule
Some good stuff here, but tangents are serious, and not what you say they are.
“In geometry, the tangent line (or simply tangent) to a plane curve at a given point is the straight line that “just touches” the curve at that point.”
In photography, a tangent is a line that intersects by” just touching” either your subject or the edge of the frame. This could be a tree lining up perfectly with the edge of your subject’s face or elbow. Or, this could be your subject’s elbow just touching the edge of the frame. These create awkward focus points that distract the viewer’s eyes from the rest of the composition. It’s not merely a line intersecting your subject, but just uncomfortably brushing the edge of something.