Featureless Studio Shots Of Models Are Quite Creepy
Jul 5, 2013
Share:
Photographer Raj Khepar set out to highlight the excessive use of post production on beauty photographs by editing beauty portraits to the level where they show no facial features.
The results of his Synthetic Beauty series are quite eerie and disturbing.

I asked Raj about his inspiration for the project:
I used a process called frequency separation to remove the features on the faces, the same process used in high end retouching, and took it to an extreme. I was hoping to show how far the technique can be taken, and the unobtainable depictions of people it can create. Aziz and Cucher had done work that closely relates this, although their work was far less about the digital and far more sculptural in execution but was a big influence

The post production consisted of using frequency separation, this works by separating skin tones from skin texture for quick and accurate editing, this allowed me to remove the features, but keep the texture of the skin. For allot of the skin tones I literally just used the paint brush tool sampling the skin.. Some shaping had to be done, as once you remove the features people’s heads begin to look quite unnaturally shaped! The rest is global color toning, dodging and burning and that’s about it!

The rest of the series puts you in the same uneasy feeling.



Here is a glimpse of a typical lighting setup Raj used.

[Synthetic Beauty | Raj Khepar]
Udi Tirosh
Udi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.


































Join the Discussion
DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.
7 responses to “Featureless Studio Shots Of Models Are Quite Creepy”
Classic portrait mistake, he’s missed the focus, on the eyes :)
…at least he was able to get them to look at the camera.
http://www.staggeringstories.net/who22-11.jpg
Or if 2006 is too soon, perhaps 1966? : http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110527150560/memoryalpha/en/images/d/d1/Faceless_woman_charlie_x.jpg
Still quite cool though, a very eerie effect.
These are pretty interesting. Definitely eerie, like mannequins I suppose.
I did something somewhat similar, only I went in the opposite direction. I have a series I called defacements where I had the model make different faces physically and then I stitched them together in photoshop, rather Frankenstein like. You can see three of them here http://www.chrislanephoto.com/blog/tag/deface/
I’ve done the same exact thing except it was for nude photography.