Recent Posts | Share a Tip | Back to Basics | Reader Photos | Forum | Subscribe
Home Studio | Tutorials | Readers Projects
There you have it. You managed to convince your wife/hubby to spare some space under the kitchen table where you can do your photo business without interruption. You have managed to scrounge up some bed sheets for backdrops. What's next? Next is the really big thing that will instantly convert your den to a fine studio after hard labor and learning will give you the ability to take wonderful photographs. Light!
FOLLOW THIS SERIES OF ARTICLES!
BACK - Easy Lighting
NEXT - Introduction To LED Lighting
As a home based studio photographer you have plenty of lighting options. The most available light is of course Available Light, then comes a range of lights that differ in their power, price, how well they store, and how controllable are they. In the post below I will explore the options there are for the home based photographer to achieve Light. In later posts I will dive into all those options.
Available Light is the photographer's best friend - as long as it's day time. Not using any artificial lighting means that you have almost zero expense. On the other hand it means that you can not shoot on your own time and that your control over light is limited. Now don't get me wrong, some great photographs can be taken with available light and some reflection and flagging. Still your control is limited Vs. any of the other options, not to mention you must have a window near by and shoot daytime only.
Next in line are tungsten bulbs. Here you get a bit more control. You can place tungsten bulbs in space and control the direction from which the light is coming from, you can control the intensity of it, heck you can even make a ringlight using tungsten bulbs. And they are cheap.
There are a few things to bear in mind when using tungsten light bulbs:
- They are hot - not only to the touch. They emit heat. If you are working in a closed space, it will be no time before the room will get hot and steamy.
- They have tungsten white balance. Now, this is not an issue if you're shooting digital. If you are shooting film, however, make sure you get some tungsten balanced film.
- They do not produce a lot of light. To get a sharp image you need to use a tripod.
One nice thing which I totally dig with tungsten bulbs (well, this applies to CFL as well) is that they are a perfect match to clamp work lights. This takes care of the mounting issue.
Halogen is similar to tungsten in the fact that it produces a lot of heat and warm light tone. Still cheap and easily stores.
In my mind they are better in two ways:
- They give more light (but also more heat). Halogen lights come in variety of power settings from 100 Watts to 500 Watts. That a lot of power.
- Some halogen work lights have great tripod mounts that are almost like lightstands.
- You will need plenty of power to use those in big quantities. Those 500 Watts a bulb quickly add up to a burned fuse.
Other than the inconvenience of working under heat, both tungsten and halogen are too hot to attach any homemade light modifiers to them. Bummer. Luckily there are cooler options:
Florescent lights and CFLs (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) are great options for indoor lighting. They are still on the lower price range, however they have a significant advantage Vs. Halogen or Tungsten - they are cooler.
Cooler means that you'll be more convenient working, it also means that you can use regular household electricity to get some nice lighting.
CFL's will also work great with work light stands and with clamps, so you gain the power of multiple lights with no heat and some great modding options.
Two notes:
- CFLs come in a variety of white balance settings. If you are getting more than one, make sure that they all have the same WB value. In fact, it is best to get multiple bulbs of the same type and from the same brand to make sure that WB will be coherent.
- Make sure you get a high CRI (Color Rendering Index) bulb. High CRI means that you will get better color accuracy on your shots.
How can you tell the WB and CRI values of the bulb? The box should say it. If the box doesn't say it, it is probably not worth the buy.
Light Emitting Diodes are great for lighting small objects. They are small, super portable and are close to nothing cost-wise.
On the power side - not that good. LEDs make for great direct light source, but try to diffuse 'em - all light is lost.
Since LEDs are so cheap and so small you can use quite a bit of them on a setup. Use them as mains, fills, kickers. You can throw tens of them on a set.
As with florescent bulbs make sure you get high CRI LEDs.
Small strobes (AKA hot shoe strobes) are great for shooting indoors. Strobes are not a continuous light source. That means that at the time of the shoot the strobe will produce a short, yet powerful burst of light.
Cost is going up a bit with those, a used flash will cost about 100 USD and to get top line new strobe you'll have to say goodbye to 400 green ones.
On the flip side, there is a lot you can do small strobes. Other than reduced power, they are one to one with the big guys. You can place 'em anywhere on a stand, snoot 'em and use them with a softbox or an umbrella.
They store nicely. Only thing is that strobes like friends. Batteries, sync cords, radio triggers, cold shoes, hot shoes, light stands, you'll never hear the end of it...
Studio Strobes are the big brothers of hot shoe strobes. They share many of the properties of their little brothers with two major differences: they are bigger and more powerful.
More powerful means you can use more lighting modifiers and still retain close apertures. Sadly, it also means they cost more.
Bigger means that you'll need more storage space.
A third difference is that Studio Strobes usually have a feature called modeling light. Modeling light is a continuous light that the flash emits that allows you to see what the burst of light will look like.
Below is a table to sum up all that's said before.
| Available Light | Tungsten | Halogen | CFL | LEDs | Strobes | Studio Flashes | |
| Cost | + | + | + | + | + | - | - |
| Easy to store | + | - | + | + | + | + | - |
| Power | - | -- | - | -/+ | - | + | + |
| Modifiable | - | - | - | + | - | + | + |
Photo Credits:Cocoa Beans at available light by mobilestreetlife, 10 Reasons Why FriendFeed is a Better Place to Browse Flickr Photos Than Flickr Itself by Thomas Hawk, CFL Study 1 - Glow by fangleman, a glass of water - bright field with LED by mr.beaver.
Make sure you don't miss out on the next article - Register to the RSS feed or the newsletter.
Comments
Interesting
As usual, interesting article! I didn't know the CFL way: I'll have a look at them for my still-life shots...
Great article!!!! I have
Great article!!!! I have always been a little confused about the different lighting types and this really explains it in plain english. thanks for the information. I will certainly use it.
Ida
Strobes
I am of the opinion that one should just work towards going from available light to strobe light, personally. Reason is that a photographer could easily cobble together enough hot light purchases to equal the price of one low end monolight, an alien bee, a 285hv or some other accessible and affordable strobe. Get the cheap/ used strobes and you're there in terms of decent DOF, ISO, and shutter speed. Plus you can take them outside and battle with the sun.
That's not to say that if the resources are already available to a photog he shouldn't avail himself/ herself of them. I just typically don't see the savings when you figure time involved and materials cost if you are going out and buying all the necessary goods.
Of course, having to work one's way up the ladder might indeed foster a fuller appreciation of strobe light.
re: strobes
Eric,
This is an interesting point of view and while I am definitely with you on direction, I support this view to a lesser degree of power.
As you said, going from available light to a more controlled environment is a huge step for any photographer. However,I do not believe that strobes are the best option for everyone.
Consider the case of a still life photog.He may be well enough with a few CFL'sa home made sotbox and some clamps/work-lights. Total cost there can be about 30-50 USD allowing the flexibility of multiple light sources.
Now don't get me wrong, I love strobes (and a proud owner of three Nikon speedlites), and strobes will get great results - they just cost a lot.
Daylight Compact Fluorescent Lamps
You can buy Full Spectrum or Daylight Ballance Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) at most hardware stores (Menards, Home Depot, etc.). I just bought some 25 watt CFL which replace 100 watt standard light bulbs. They are 5000 K (5000 Kelvin) which is a natural white balance - similar to sun light and photographs a nice white neutral color. Best of all they are very inexpensive, cost about the same as a normal CFL light bulb. You will need quite a few bulbs to light a portrait with enough light to use fast enough shutter speed. They also had a bulb that was brighter which I'll try next time. The package says they will last 8,000 hours which is a very long time.
I just bought a Lumipro
I just bought a Lumipro strobe for us$125. They are simple manual and very efficient. They also have an optical slave built in, which is a handy feature for folks like myself who can only buy one piece of equipment at a time. Check out www.strobist.com for links.
Post new comment