How To Photograph A Tower Of Salt Grains

If you thought that building a tower out of salt grains is a hard thing, think how hard it would be to photograph it in a nice way.

Photographer Alex Parker did manage to build a small tower of salt grains and take its picture.

01-10-2011-macro05

The trick was to use two lenses mounted in reverse to each other. The amazing macro is done by using a 18-50mm f/2.8 lens reversed on top of a 70-200mm f/2.8. This can gain magnification of about X11.Alex explains why there are only two grains:

"I was going to attempt 3, but I only managed to do it once, and it fell over before I could take the shot :< I don't think 3 would fit in the frame, anyway, without going to portrait orientation.#

The small tower was built with some very small tweezers. You can see more of this set here.

Get the DIYP greatness via RSS, newsletter and Twitter
Connect with the community: Facebook Page, Discussions
Share Ideas, Setups, Images and Projects on DIYP's Flickr, visit Readers Photos

Comments

salt

  • November 4, 2011
  • Anonymous

Kinda looks like an electron microscope scan

Shallow depth of field

This reminds me of yet another photography related topic I want to try sometime.  One of the links in your linked article has reversing rings for under $10 so this is a cheap one to try.

One humerious aspect of that photo is the shallow depth of field.  You can say for that photo the depth of field is literally less than a grain of salt.

photo size (vignette?)

  • November 6, 2011
  • Anonymous

Did photo taken using two-lenses-mounted-in-reverse method by 70-200 combined with 17-50 covered the full picture (without 80% vignette) or just a tiny bit of center of the picture (with vignette which you had to crop to get something like 400x300px photo) ?

No, that was the fully

  • November 7, 2011
  • EngineerOtter

No, that was the fully composed image. There was no vignetting, and no cropping. However, if you stop the primary lens (In this case, the 70-200) down past about f/4, you start seeing the aperture blades in the image, so it's best to avoid that.

cant seem to get that close

  • January 17, 2012
  • Anonymous

i have a 50, 18-70, 55-200, and 70-300 macro lens and i think ive tried almost every combination of these lenses but i cant seem to get that close. my lenses are by far inferior to what was used to capture this but what can i do to in closer with what i have?

this is some true

  • February 23, 2012
  • Anonymous

this is some true photographic genius. i love the idea

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. It is not case sensitive
12 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.